A conservative approach in finding compatible blood for a patient with sickle cell disease having multiple alloantibodies.

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-12 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_114_22
Sanmukh Ratilal Joshi, Mayuri M Vekariya, Manisha M Rajapara
{"title":"A conservative approach in finding compatible blood for a patient with sickle cell disease having multiple alloantibodies.","authors":"Sanmukh Ratilal Joshi,&nbsp;Mayuri M Vekariya,&nbsp;Manisha M Rajapara","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_114_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients may develop multiple alloantibodies that pose problem in finding compatible blood for transfusion and require crossmatching with large number of blood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study was to find compatible blood with reduced cost by adopting a conservative approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A step-by-step approach using tube technique, antibodies in original serum, and the saved test supernatant (TS) in search of compatible blood for transfusion purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 years SCD patient grouped A with multiple antibodies required transfusion. A total of 641 red blood cell (RBC) units of groups A and O were crossmatched using serum and the TS by tube method. Of 138 units tested using the serum at 4°C, 124 units showed direct agglutination in the saline phase and the remaining 14 units were processed through low ionic strength solution (LISS)-IAT, of which 2 units were compatible even by the gel-IgG-card method. The TS, saved from the tests on serum, was used in an identical manner as that of the serum to screen additional 503 units by saline tube method at 4°C units showed direct agglutination of the RBCs of 428 units, hence were removed from inventory for this patient. The remaining 75 units were tested by the LISS-IAT-tube method at 37°C, of which 8 units were found compatible but only 2 units were clear compatible by the gel-IgG-card method. As such, 4 units compatible by the sensitive gel-IgG-card method were issued for transfusion purposes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new approach on using the saved TS consumed less of the patient's blood specimen, and the use of the tube method in screening and eliminating a large chunk of incompatible blood units has proved economical if compared with the use of the only gel-IgG-cards device in the entire maneuvering.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"121-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/ad/AJTS-17-121.PMC10180799.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_114_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients may develop multiple alloantibodies that pose problem in finding compatible blood for transfusion and require crossmatching with large number of blood.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to find compatible blood with reduced cost by adopting a conservative approach.

Materials and methods: A step-by-step approach using tube technique, antibodies in original serum, and the saved test supernatant (TS) in search of compatible blood for transfusion purposes.

Results: 32 years SCD patient grouped A with multiple antibodies required transfusion. A total of 641 red blood cell (RBC) units of groups A and O were crossmatched using serum and the TS by tube method. Of 138 units tested using the serum at 4°C, 124 units showed direct agglutination in the saline phase and the remaining 14 units were processed through low ionic strength solution (LISS)-IAT, of which 2 units were compatible even by the gel-IgG-card method. The TS, saved from the tests on serum, was used in an identical manner as that of the serum to screen additional 503 units by saline tube method at 4°C units showed direct agglutination of the RBCs of 428 units, hence were removed from inventory for this patient. The remaining 75 units were tested by the LISS-IAT-tube method at 37°C, of which 8 units were found compatible but only 2 units were clear compatible by the gel-IgG-card method. As such, 4 units compatible by the sensitive gel-IgG-card method were issued for transfusion purposes.

Conclusion: The new approach on using the saved TS consumed less of the patient's blood specimen, and the use of the tube method in screening and eliminating a large chunk of incompatible blood units has proved economical if compared with the use of the only gel-IgG-cards device in the entire maneuvering.

Abstract Image

为具有多种同种异体抗体的镰状细胞病患者寻找相容性血液的保守方法。
背景:镰状细胞病(SCD)患者可能会产生多种同种异体抗体,这些抗体在寻找可供输血的相容性血液方面存在问题,并且需要与大量血液进行交叉配型。目的:本研究的目的是通过采用保守的方法来寻找成本更低的相容性血液。材料和方法:采用试管技术、原始血清中的抗体和保存的测试上清液(TS)逐步寻找输血用相容性血液。结果:32岁SCD患者A组有多种抗体需要输血。使用血清和TS通过试管法对A组和O组的总共641个红细胞(RBC)单位进行交叉配型。在4°C下使用血清测试的138个单位中,124个单位在盐水相中显示出直接凝集,其余14个单位通过低离子强度溶液(LISS)-IAT处理,其中2个单位即使通过凝胶IgG卡法也兼容。从血清测试中保存下来的TS以与血清相同的方式使用,通过盐水管法在4°C下筛选额外的503个单位。单位显示428个单位的RBC直接凝集,因此从该患者的库存中删除。其余75个单位通过LISS IAT试管法在37°C下进行测试,其中8个单位是相容的,但只有2个单位通过凝胶IgG卡法是明确相容的。因此,发放了4个通过敏感凝胶IgG卡方法兼容的单位用于输血。结论:与在整个操作中使用唯一的凝胶IgG卡设备相比,使用节省的TS的新方法消耗更少的患者血样,并且使用试管法筛查和消除大量不兼容的血液单位被证明是经济的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信