Postoje sester a studentů ošetřovatelství k očkování proti covid-19 - přehled.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
A Chrdle, S Bártlová, I Chloubová
{"title":"Postoje sester a studentů ošetřovatelství k očkování proti covid-19 - přehled.","authors":"A Chrdle,&nbsp;S Bártlová,&nbsp;I Chloubová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>There is a discussion about COVID-19 vaccination rates among healthcare workers (HCW), especially nurses. The primary question for this review was: \"What are the attitudes of nurses, compared to other HCW, towards COVID-19 vaccination?\" The secondary questions included the proportion of nurses with intention to get vaccinated, what prevents the nurses from accepting the vaccine and what enables them to accept the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR format for scoping reviews was chosen to respect the novelty of COVID-19 vaccines. Database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, PROquest and EBSCO) was performed for original studies in English language, from all geographies, with most recent search on March 20, 2022. Vaccination acceptance rates were charted for nurses and nursing students in one category, and HCW other than nurses in the other category. The evolution in time of the nurses attitude to vaccine acceptance relative to that of HCW other than nurses was charted post hoc. The factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intention according to the WHO categories (contextual influences, individual/ group influences, and vaccine/vaccination specific issues) were reviewed as narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 58 eligible studies were selected, all with cross-sectional study design, including 95418 healthcare workers of whom 33130 were nurses and 7391 were nursing students, from 44 countries in Europe, Americas, Africa and Asia. Trust in science, in doctors, in experts and in governments were the main contextual factors increasing vaccination acceptance mentioned in the studies, while altruism and collective protection, or protecting a person at risk at home was mentioned only few times. The nurses were less likely to accept vaccination compared to doctors and other HCWs at the onset, eg. before vaccine rollout, and this difference decreased with time (p = 0.022). Being older (n = 25 studies), being male (n = 23), having higher degree of education (n = 7), and having more years of clinical practice (n = 4) were associated with higher vaccination acceptance. Percieved individual risk of having severe COVID-19 (n = 14) or working in a COVID-19 dedicated units (n = 5) was mentioned in a minority of studies. The main vaccine-releated factors associated with higher vaccination intention were trust in the vaccine and its efficacy and safety, general vaccinatoin acceptance and specifically having had influenza vaccination in previous years (n = 21 studies). A significant factor associated with higher vaccine acceptance was high \"vaccine knowledge\", \"vaccine literacy\", \"understanding the vaccine\" or \"understanding benefits and barriers of vaccination\" (n = 17 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses have been more hesitant to accept COVID-19 vaccination than other healthcare professions at the beginning, but with time this difference disappeared. This general nurse attitude of wait-and-see reported in the studies corresponds with real-life data from practicing healthcare workers as reported by the Czech Institute of Health Information and Statistics on vaccination against COVID-19. Trust in scientific structures and vaccine makers increases the vaccine acceptance. The acceptance increases also with higher age, increasing level of education, longer clinical experience, and also with being a male. Vaccine literacy and having participated in previous vaccination programmes, especially influenza vaccine, were identified as independent modifiable factors increasing vaccination acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54374,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","volume":"72 1","pages":"25-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: There is a discussion about COVID-19 vaccination rates among healthcare workers (HCW), especially nurses. The primary question for this review was: "What are the attitudes of nurses, compared to other HCW, towards COVID-19 vaccination?" The secondary questions included the proportion of nurses with intention to get vaccinated, what prevents the nurses from accepting the vaccine and what enables them to accept the vaccine.

Methods: The PRISMA-ScR format for scoping reviews was chosen to respect the novelty of COVID-19 vaccines. Database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, PROquest and EBSCO) was performed for original studies in English language, from all geographies, with most recent search on March 20, 2022. Vaccination acceptance rates were charted for nurses and nursing students in one category, and HCW other than nurses in the other category. The evolution in time of the nurses attitude to vaccine acceptance relative to that of HCW other than nurses was charted post hoc. The factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intention according to the WHO categories (contextual influences, individual/ group influences, and vaccine/vaccination specific issues) were reviewed as narrative summary.

Results: Total 58 eligible studies were selected, all with cross-sectional study design, including 95418 healthcare workers of whom 33130 were nurses and 7391 were nursing students, from 44 countries in Europe, Americas, Africa and Asia. Trust in science, in doctors, in experts and in governments were the main contextual factors increasing vaccination acceptance mentioned in the studies, while altruism and collective protection, or protecting a person at risk at home was mentioned only few times. The nurses were less likely to accept vaccination compared to doctors and other HCWs at the onset, eg. before vaccine rollout, and this difference decreased with time (p = 0.022). Being older (n = 25 studies), being male (n = 23), having higher degree of education (n = 7), and having more years of clinical practice (n = 4) were associated with higher vaccination acceptance. Percieved individual risk of having severe COVID-19 (n = 14) or working in a COVID-19 dedicated units (n = 5) was mentioned in a minority of studies. The main vaccine-releated factors associated with higher vaccination intention were trust in the vaccine and its efficacy and safety, general vaccinatoin acceptance and specifically having had influenza vaccination in previous years (n = 21 studies). A significant factor associated with higher vaccine acceptance was high "vaccine knowledge", "vaccine literacy", "understanding the vaccine" or "understanding benefits and barriers of vaccination" (n = 17 studies).

Conclusions: Nurses have been more hesitant to accept COVID-19 vaccination than other healthcare professions at the beginning, but with time this difference disappeared. This general nurse attitude of wait-and-see reported in the studies corresponds with real-life data from practicing healthcare workers as reported by the Czech Institute of Health Information and Statistics on vaccination against COVID-19. Trust in scientific structures and vaccine makers increases the vaccine acceptance. The acceptance increases also with higher age, increasing level of education, longer clinical experience, and also with being a male. Vaccine literacy and having participated in previous vaccination programmes, especially influenza vaccine, were identified as independent modifiable factors increasing vaccination acceptance.

护士和护理学生对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的态度概述。
目的:探讨医护人员特别是护士的COVID-19疫苗接种率。本综述的主要问题是:“与其他医护人员相比,护士对COVID-19疫苗接种的态度如何?”次要问题包括有意向接种疫苗的护士比例,什么因素阻碍护士接受疫苗,什么因素使护士接受疫苗。方法:为尊重COVID-19疫苗的新颖性,选择PRISMA-ScR格式进行范围评价。数据库检索(PubMed/MEDLINE, PROquest和EBSCO)对来自所有地区的英语原始研究进行了检索,最近一次检索是在2022年3月20日。其中一类为护士和护生的疫苗接种率,另一类为非护士的HCW。事后绘制护士对疫苗接受态度相对于普通医护人员的时间演变图。根据世卫组织类别(背景影响、个人/群体影响和疫苗/疫苗接种特定问题),对与COVID-19疫苗接种意愿相关的因素进行了综述。结果:共纳入58项符合条件的研究,均采用横断面研究设计,包括来自欧洲、美洲、非洲和亚洲44个国家的卫生保健工作者95418人,其中护士33130人,护生7391人。研究中提到,对科学、医生、专家和政府的信任是增加疫苗接种接受度的主要背景因素,而利他主义和集体保护,或在家中保护有风险的人,仅被提及几次。与医生和其他卫生保健工作者相比,护士在发病时不太可能接受疫苗接种。该差异随着时间的推移而减小(p = 0.022)。年龄较大(n = 25)、男性(n = 23)、受教育程度较高(n = 7)、临床实践年限较长(n = 4)与较高的疫苗接受度相关。少数研究提到了患严重COVID-19 (n = 14)或在COVID-19专用单位工作(n = 5)的个人风险。与较高的疫苗接种意愿相关的主要疫苗相关因素是对疫苗及其有效性和安全性的信任,普遍接受疫苗接种,特别是在前几年接种过流感疫苗(n = 21项研究)。与较高的疫苗接受度相关的一个重要因素是较高的“疫苗知识”、“疫苗素养”、“了解疫苗”或“了解疫苗接种的益处和障碍”(n = 17项研究)。结论:护士在开始接受COVID-19疫苗接种时比其他医护人员更犹豫,但随着时间的推移,这种差异逐渐消失。研究中报告的这种一般护士的观望态度与捷克卫生信息和统计研究所报告的关于COVID-19疫苗接种的执业卫生保健工作者的实际数据相对应。对科学结构和疫苗制造商的信任增加了疫苗的接受度。接受度也随着年龄的增加、教育水平的提高、临床经验的延长以及男性的增加而增加。疫苗知识和参加过以前的疫苗接种规划,特别是流感疫苗接种,被确定为提高疫苗接种接受度的独立可改变因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers, information from practice, reviews on epidemiological and microbiological subjects. Sufficient space is devoted to diagnostic methods from medical microbiology, parasitology, immunology, and to general aspects and discussions pertaining to preventive medicine. It also brings translations and book reviews useful for medical doctors and research workers and professionals in public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信