Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Effect of Patient and Pathogen Factors on Outcome.

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bharathi Arunan, Nishat H Ahmed, Arti Kapil, Naval K Vikram, Sanjeev Sinha, Ashutosh Biswas, Gita Satpathy, Naveet Wig
{"title":"Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Effect of Patient and Pathogen Factors on Outcome.","authors":"Bharathi Arunan,&nbsp;Nishat H Ahmed,&nbsp;Arti Kapil,&nbsp;Naval K Vikram,&nbsp;Sanjeev Sinha,&nbsp;Ashutosh Biswas,&nbsp;Gita Satpathy,&nbsp;Naveet Wig","doi":"10.4103/jgid.jgid_213_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients on central lines are often having multiple morbidities, and invasive devices provide a niche for biofilm formation, which makes central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), a serious concern in health-care settings, as the infections difficult to treat. In this study, we evaluated the common bacteria causing CLABSI, and various patient and pathogen factors affecting the clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the prospective observational study, patients diagnosed with CLABSI were recruited. Extensive clinical, microbiological, and other laboratory workup was done, and observations were recorded. Congo red agar method, tube test, and microtiter plate assay were used for eliciting the biofilm-forming attributes of the bacterial pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> was responsible for 48% of CLABSI, followed by Coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococci</i> (16%) and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (12% each). Fifty-six percent of the isolates produced biofilms. The median (interquartile range) duration of hospital stay till death or discharge was 30 (20, 43) days. The all-cause mortality was 44%. Patients having a deranged liver function on the day of diagnosis (<i>P</i> value for total bilirubin 0.001 and for aspartate transaminase 0.02), and those infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (<i>P</i> value = 0.04) had significantly poor prognosis. The difference in the demographic, clinical, laboratory profile, and outcome of patients infected with biofilm producers and nonproducers was not found to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study throws light on various host and pathogen factors determining the cause and outcome of CLABSI patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study trying to decipher the role of biofilm formation in the virulence of pathogens and the prognosis of CLABSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","volume":"15 2","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/f2/JGID-15-59.PMC10353639.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_213_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients on central lines are often having multiple morbidities, and invasive devices provide a niche for biofilm formation, which makes central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), a serious concern in health-care settings, as the infections difficult to treat. In this study, we evaluated the common bacteria causing CLABSI, and various patient and pathogen factors affecting the clinical outcome.

Methods: In the prospective observational study, patients diagnosed with CLABSI were recruited. Extensive clinical, microbiological, and other laboratory workup was done, and observations were recorded. Congo red agar method, tube test, and microtiter plate assay were used for eliciting the biofilm-forming attributes of the bacterial pathogens.

Results: Klebsiella pneumoniae was responsible for 48% of CLABSI, followed by Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (16%) and Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii (12% each). Fifty-six percent of the isolates produced biofilms. The median (interquartile range) duration of hospital stay till death or discharge was 30 (20, 43) days. The all-cause mortality was 44%. Patients having a deranged liver function on the day of diagnosis (P value for total bilirubin 0.001 and for aspartate transaminase 0.02), and those infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (P value = 0.04) had significantly poor prognosis. The difference in the demographic, clinical, laboratory profile, and outcome of patients infected with biofilm producers and nonproducers was not found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: The study throws light on various host and pathogen factors determining the cause and outcome of CLABSI patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study trying to decipher the role of biofilm formation in the virulence of pathogens and the prognosis of CLABSI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中心线相关血流感染:患者和病原体因素对结果的影响。
中心静脉导管的患者通常有多种发病率,侵入性装置为生物膜形成提供了一个利基,这使得中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSIs)成为卫生保健机构的一个严重问题,因为这种感染难以治疗。在本研究中,我们评估了导致CLABSI的常见细菌,以及影响临床结果的各种患者和病原体因素。方法:在前瞻性观察研究中,招募诊断为CLABSI的患者。进行了广泛的临床、微生物学和其他实验室检查,并记录了观察结果。采用刚果红琼脂法、试管法和微滴板法测定病原菌的生物膜形成特性。结果:肺炎克雷伯菌占CLABSI的48%,其次是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(16%),金黄色葡萄球菌和鲍曼不动杆菌各占12%。56%的分离菌产生了生物膜。住院至死亡或出院的中位数(四分位数间距)为30(20,43)天。全因死亡率为44%。诊断当日肝功能紊乱(总胆红素P值为0.001,天冬氨酸转氨酶P值为0.02)和多药耐药菌感染(P值= 0.04)的患者预后明显较差。感染生物膜产生者和非生物膜产生者的患者在人口统计学、临床、实验室和预后方面的差异没有统计学意义。结论:本研究揭示了影响CLABSI患者病因和预后的多种宿主和病原体因素。据我们所知,这是第一个试图破译生物膜形成在病原体毒力和CLABSI预后中的作用的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: JGID encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Infectious Diseases across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in Infectious Diseases to promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信