Isabel Guisado-Cuadrado, Víctor M. Alfaro-Magallanes, Nuria Romero-Parra, Beatriz Rael, Amelia Guadalupe-Grau, Ana B. Peinado
{"title":"Influence of sex hormones status and type of training on regional bone mineral density in exercising females","authors":"Isabel Guisado-Cuadrado, Víctor M. Alfaro-Magallanes, Nuria Romero-Parra, Beatriz Rael, Amelia Guadalupe-Grau, Ana B. Peinado","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2023.2211947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The primary objective of this study was to examine the influence of hormonal ovarian profile and training characteristics on spine, pelvis, and total body bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of well-trained females. Forty-two eumenorrheic females, twenty-eight monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) users and thirteen postmenopausal females participated in this study. Body composition was measured by total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine BMD of the areas of interest. Endurance-trained premenopausal females showed lower spine BMD compared to resistance-trained premenopausal females (1.03 ± 0.1 vs. 1.09 ± 0.09 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.025). Postmenopausal females reported lower BMD level in comparison to eumenorrheic females in pelvis (1.079 ± 0.082 vs 1.19 ± 0.115 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.005), spine (0.969 ± 0.097 vs 1.069 ± 0.109 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.012) and total (1.122 ± 0.08 vs 1.193 ± 0.077 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.018) and OC users whose duration of OC use was less than 5 years (OC < 5) in pelvis (1.235 ± 0.068 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and spine (1.062 ± 0.069 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.018). In addition, lower BMD values were found in OC users who had been using OC for more than 5 years (OC ≥ 5) than eumenorrheic females in pelvis (1.078 ± 0.086 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.029) and spine (0.966 ± 0.08 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.05). Likewise, OC ≥ 5 showed lower values than and OC < 5 in pelvis (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and spine (<i>p</i> = 0.047). We observed a lower spine BMD value in premenopausal endurance-trained females compared to premenopausal resistance-trained females. Moreover, this research observed that prolonged use of OCs may reduce bone mass acquisition in the spine and pelvis, even in well-trained females. Finally, postmenopausal showed lower BMD despite being exercising women.</p>\n <p><b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04458662.</p>\n <p><b>Highlights</b>\n \n </p><ul>\n \n <li>\n <p>Ovarian hormonal profile should be considered when assessing BMD in female athletes.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n <p>The duration of oral contraceptive use influences spine and pelvis regional BMD in exercising females.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n <p>Postmenopausal women show lower BMD when compared to premenopausal females despite being exercising females.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 11","pages":"2139-2147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2023.2211947","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2023.2211947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to examine the influence of hormonal ovarian profile and training characteristics on spine, pelvis, and total body bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of well-trained females. Forty-two eumenorrheic females, twenty-eight monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) users and thirteen postmenopausal females participated in this study. Body composition was measured by total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine BMD of the areas of interest. Endurance-trained premenopausal females showed lower spine BMD compared to resistance-trained premenopausal females (1.03 ± 0.1 vs. 1.09 ± 0.09 g/cm2; p = 0.025). Postmenopausal females reported lower BMD level in comparison to eumenorrheic females in pelvis (1.079 ± 0.082 vs 1.19 ± 0.115 g/cm2; p = 0.005), spine (0.969 ± 0.097 vs 1.069 ± 0.109 g/cm2; p = 0.012) and total (1.122 ± 0.08 vs 1.193 ± 0.077 g/cm2; p = 0.018) and OC users whose duration of OC use was less than 5 years (OC < 5) in pelvis (1.235 ± 0.068 g/cm2; p < 0.001) and spine (1.062 ± 0.069 g/cm2; p = 0.018). In addition, lower BMD values were found in OC users who had been using OC for more than 5 years (OC ≥ 5) than eumenorrheic females in pelvis (1.078 ± 0.086 g/cm2; p = 0.029) and spine (0.966 ± 0.08 g/cm2; p = 0.05). Likewise, OC ≥ 5 showed lower values than and OC < 5 in pelvis (p = 0.004) and spine (p = 0.047). We observed a lower spine BMD value in premenopausal endurance-trained females compared to premenopausal resistance-trained females. Moreover, this research observed that prolonged use of OCs may reduce bone mass acquisition in the spine and pelvis, even in well-trained females. Finally, postmenopausal showed lower BMD despite being exercising women.