Pilot Study of a Wearable Hydration Monitor in Haemodialysis Patients: Haemodialysis Outcomes & Patient Empowerment Study 02.

Q1 Computer Science
Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2023-05-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529899
Vicki Sandys, Lavleen Bhat, Emer O'Hare, Anna Ninan, Kevin Doyle, Shane Kelly, Peter Conlon, Donal Sexton, Colin Edwards, Paul McAleese, Conall O'Seaghdha
{"title":"Pilot Study of a Wearable Hydration Monitor in Haemodialysis Patients: Haemodialysis Outcomes & Patient Empowerment Study 02.","authors":"Vicki Sandys, Lavleen Bhat, Emer O'Hare, Anna Ninan, Kevin Doyle, Shane Kelly, Peter Conlon, Donal Sexton, Colin Edwards, Paul McAleese, Conall O'Seaghdha","doi":"10.1159/000529899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to assess the validity and reproducibility of a wearable hydration device in a cohort of maintenance dialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-arm observational study on 20 haemodialysis patients between January and June 2021 in a single centre. A prototype wearable infrared spectroscopy device, termed the Sixty device, was worn on the forearm during dialysis sessions and nocturnally. Bioimpedance measurements were performed 4 times using the body composition monitor (BCM) over 3 weeks. Measurements from the Sixty device were compared with the BCM overhydration index (litres) pre- and post-dialysis and with standard haemodialysis parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 out of 20 patients had useable data. Mean age was 52 ± 12.4 years. The overall accuracy for predicting pre-dialysis categories of fluid status using Sixty device was 0.55 [K = 0.00; 95% CI: -0.39-0.42]. The accuracy for the prediction of post-dialysis categories of volume status was low [accuracy = 0.34, K = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.13-0.3]. Sixty outputs at the start and end of dialysis were weakly correlated with pre- and post-dialysis weights (<i>r</i> = 0.27 and <i>r</i> = 0.27, respectively), as well as weight loss during dialysis (<i>r</i> = 0.31), but not ultrafiltration volume (<i>r</i> = 0.12). There was no difference between the change in Sixty readings overnight and the change in Sixty readings during dialysis (mean difference 0.09 ± 1.5 kg), [<i>t</i>(39) = 0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.71].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prototype wearable infrared spectroscopy device was unable to accurately assess changes in fluid status during or between dialysis sessions. In the future, hardware development and advances in photonics may enable the tracking of interdialytic fluid status.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"7 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess the validity and reproducibility of a wearable hydration device in a cohort of maintenance dialysis patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-arm observational study on 20 haemodialysis patients between January and June 2021 in a single centre. A prototype wearable infrared spectroscopy device, termed the Sixty device, was worn on the forearm during dialysis sessions and nocturnally. Bioimpedance measurements were performed 4 times using the body composition monitor (BCM) over 3 weeks. Measurements from the Sixty device were compared with the BCM overhydration index (litres) pre- and post-dialysis and with standard haemodialysis parameters.

Results: 12 out of 20 patients had useable data. Mean age was 52 ± 12.4 years. The overall accuracy for predicting pre-dialysis categories of fluid status using Sixty device was 0.55 [K = 0.00; 95% CI: -0.39-0.42]. The accuracy for the prediction of post-dialysis categories of volume status was low [accuracy = 0.34, K = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.13-0.3]. Sixty outputs at the start and end of dialysis were weakly correlated with pre- and post-dialysis weights (r = 0.27 and r = 0.27, respectively), as well as weight loss during dialysis (r = 0.31), but not ultrafiltration volume (r = 0.12). There was no difference between the change in Sixty readings overnight and the change in Sixty readings during dialysis (mean difference 0.09 ± 1.5 kg), [t(39) = 0.38, p = 0.71].

Conclusion: A prototype wearable infrared spectroscopy device was unable to accurately assess changes in fluid status during or between dialysis sessions. In the future, hardware development and advances in photonics may enable the tracking of interdialytic fluid status.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

血液透析患者可穿戴式水合监测仪的试点研究:血液透析结果与患者赋权研究 02》。
简介我们的目的是在一组维持性透析患者中评估可穿戴式水合设备的有效性和可重复性:我们于 2021 年 1 月至 6 月在一个中心对 20 名血液透析患者进行了前瞻性单臂观察研究。在透析过程中和夜间,我们在前臂上佩戴了一个可穿戴红外分光仪原型,称为 "Sixty "装置。在 3 周内使用身体成分监测仪 (BCM) 进行了 4 次生物阻抗测量。将 Sixty 设备的测量结果与透析前后的 BCM 过水指数(升)以及标准血液透析参数进行比较:20名患者中有12名患者的数据可用。平均年龄为 52 ± 12.4 岁。使用 Sixty 设备预测透析前体液状况类别的总体准确率为 0.55 [K = 0.00; 95% CI: -0.39-0.42]。预测透析后容量状态类别的准确度较低[准确度 = 0.34,K = 0.08;95% CI:-0.13-0.3]。透析开始和结束时的六十输出量与透析前和透析后的体重(r = 0.27 和 r = 0.27)以及透析期间的体重减轻(r = 0.31)呈弱相关,但与超滤量(r = 0.12)不相关。透析期间的六十度读数变化(平均差异为 0.09 ± 1.5 千克)与一夜之间的六十度读数变化(平均差异为 0.09 ± 1.5 千克)之间没有差异,[t(39) = 0.38,p = 0.71]:结论:可穿戴红外分光仪原型无法准确评估透析过程中或透析间液体状态的变化。未来,硬件的发展和光子学的进步可能会实现透析间液体状态的追踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信