Food memory test to evaluate memory function.

Ji-Hun Choi, Dong-Woo Kim, Hye-Jee La, Hyoshin Son, Soon-Tae Lee
{"title":"Food memory test to evaluate memory function.","authors":"Ji-Hun Choi,&nbsp;Dong-Woo Kim,&nbsp;Hye-Jee La,&nbsp;Hyoshin Son,&nbsp;Soon-Tae Lee","doi":"10.47936/encephalitis.2021.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate cognitive function with ease at bedside, we developed a novel neurologic exam called the \"food memory test (FMT)\" and evaluated its validity for use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study in a neurology clinic, we asked patients about what they had eaten for the soup and main dish at the last meal [FMT1] and the second-to-last meal [FMT2]. If they answered correctly for both the soup and main dish, they received a \"pass\" score. If they did not answer or chose the wrong food, they received a \"fail\" score. We also performed conventional cognitive function tests for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 patients was enrolled, and 12 (44.4%) passed the FMT1 test. FMT1 has a strong correlation with conventional memory function tests, including time-place orientation, three-word recall, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test, and the Rey Complex Figure Test . FMT1 was not correlated with a depression score or with frontal lobe function tests. FMT2 showed less significant correlation with conventional memory tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that FMT1 is a reliable bedside test to evaluate recent memory. Clinical application of FMT in daily clinical practice is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":72904,"journal":{"name":"Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea)","volume":"1 2","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/f0/encephalitis-2021-00031.PMC10295888.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47936/encephalitis.2021.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate cognitive function with ease at bedside, we developed a novel neurologic exam called the "food memory test (FMT)" and evaluated its validity for use in clinical practice.

Methods: In this prospective study in a neurology clinic, we asked patients about what they had eaten for the soup and main dish at the last meal [FMT1] and the second-to-last meal [FMT2]. If they answered correctly for both the soup and main dish, they received a "pass" score. If they did not answer or chose the wrong food, they received a "fail" score. We also performed conventional cognitive function tests for comparison.

Results: A total of 27 patients was enrolled, and 12 (44.4%) passed the FMT1 test. FMT1 has a strong correlation with conventional memory function tests, including time-place orientation, three-word recall, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test, and the Rey Complex Figure Test . FMT1 was not correlated with a depression score or with frontal lobe function tests. FMT2 showed less significant correlation with conventional memory tests.

Conclusion: These results suggest that FMT1 is a reliable bedside test to evaluate recent memory. Clinical application of FMT in daily clinical practice is warranted.

Abstract Image

食物记忆测试评估记忆功能。
目的:为了在床边轻松地评估认知功能,我们开发了一种新的神经系统检查,称为“食物记忆测试(FMT)”,并评估其在临床实践中的有效性。方法:在一项神经病学门诊的前瞻性研究中,我们询问患者在最后一餐[FMT1]和倒数第二餐[FMT2]的汤和主菜吃了什么。如果他们对汤和主菜的回答都是正确的,他们就会得到“及格”的分数。如果他们没有回答或选择了错误的食物,他们就会得到一个“不及格”分数。我们还进行了常规的认知功能测试进行比较。结果:共入组27例患者,12例(44.4%)通过FMT1检测。FMT1与传统的记忆功能测试有很强的相关性,包括时间-地点取向、三词回忆、首尔语言学习测试和雷伊复杂图形测试。FMT1与抑郁评分或额叶功能测试无关。FMT2与常规记忆测试的相关性不显著。结论:FMT1是评价近期记忆的可靠床边试验。FMT在日常临床实践中的临床应用是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信