Teaching Observation as a Faculty Development Tool in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Simon Kitto, Natalia Danilovich, Paula Rowland, Karen Leslie, Paul Hendry, Amanda Hodgson, Arone Fantaye, Heather Lochnan
{"title":"Teaching Observation as a Faculty Development Tool in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Simon Kitto, Natalia Danilovich, Paula Rowland, Karen Leslie, Paul Hendry, Amanda Hodgson, Arone Fantaye, Heather Lochnan","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health professions education often includes teaching observation to inform faculty development (FD) and indirectly improve student performance. Although these FD approaches are well received by faculty, they remain underused and/or underreported, with limited opportunities to receive feedback in workplace contexts. The goal of our study was to map the depth and breadth of education literature on the use of observation of teaching as a tool of professional development in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the methodology by Arksey and O'Malley, we conducted a scoping review and searched four databases for articles published in English (final searches in April 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2080 articles identified, 45 met the inclusion criteria. All observation activities were associated with one of the following FD approaches: peer observation of teaching (23 articles, 51%), peer coaching (12, 27%), peer review (9, 20%), and the critical friends approach (1, 2%). Thirty-three articles (73%) concerned formative versions of the observation model that took place in clinical settings (21, 47%), and they tended to be a voluntary (27, 60%), one-off (18, 40%), in-person intervention (29, 65%), characterized by limited institutional support (13, 29%). Both barriers and challenges of teaching observation were identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review identified several challenges and shortcomings associated with teaching observation, such as inadequate methodological quality of research articles, inconsistent terminology, and limited understanding of the factors that promote long-term sustainability within FD programs. Practical strategies to consider when designing an FD program that incorporates teaching observation are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health professions education often includes teaching observation to inform faculty development (FD) and indirectly improve student performance. Although these FD approaches are well received by faculty, they remain underused and/or underreported, with limited opportunities to receive feedback in workplace contexts. The goal of our study was to map the depth and breadth of education literature on the use of observation of teaching as a tool of professional development in medical education.

Methods: Following the methodology by Arksey and O'Malley, we conducted a scoping review and searched four databases for articles published in English (final searches in April 2022).

Results: Of 2080 articles identified, 45 met the inclusion criteria. All observation activities were associated with one of the following FD approaches: peer observation of teaching (23 articles, 51%), peer coaching (12, 27%), peer review (9, 20%), and the critical friends approach (1, 2%). Thirty-three articles (73%) concerned formative versions of the observation model that took place in clinical settings (21, 47%), and they tended to be a voluntary (27, 60%), one-off (18, 40%), in-person intervention (29, 65%), characterized by limited institutional support (13, 29%). Both barriers and challenges of teaching observation were identified.

Discussion: This review identified several challenges and shortcomings associated with teaching observation, such as inadequate methodological quality of research articles, inconsistent terminology, and limited understanding of the factors that promote long-term sustainability within FD programs. Practical strategies to consider when designing an FD program that incorporates teaching observation are outlined.

将教学观摩作为医学教育中的教师发展工具:范围综述。
导言:健康专业教育通常包括教学观摩,以便为教师发展(FD)提供信息,并间接提高学生成绩。虽然这些教师发展方法深受教师欢迎,但仍未得到充分利用和/或充分报道,在工作场所获得反馈的机会有限。我们的研究目标是对有关将教学观察作为医学教育专业发展工具的教育文献的深度和广度进行梳理:按照Arksey和O'Malley的方法,我们进行了一次范围界定审查,并在四个数据库中检索了以英文发表的文章(2022年4月的最终检索):在确定的 2080 篇文章中,有 45 篇符合纳入标准。所有观察活动都与以下一种FD方法有关:同行教学观察(23篇文章,51%)、同行辅导(12篇文章,27%)、同行评议(9篇文章,20%)和关键朋友方法(1篇文章,2%)。有 33 篇文章(73%)涉及在临床环境中开展的形成性观察模式(21 篇,47%),它们往往是自愿的(27 篇,60%)、一次性的(18 篇,40%)、面对面的干预(29 篇,65%),其特点是机构支持有限(13 篇,29%)。讨论:本综述发现了与教学观摩相关的一些挑战和不足,如研究文章的方法质量不高、术语不一致以及对促进教学观摩项目长期可持续性的因素了解有限。本文概述了在设计包含教学观摩的基础教育项目时应考虑的实用策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信