The incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures in adults treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Tianrui Yang, Lishan Jiang, Weiman Sun, Meng Zhu, Ke Jiang, Houxuan Li, Lang Lei
{"title":"The incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures in adults treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tianrui Yang,&nbsp;Lishan Jiang,&nbsp;Weiman Sun,&nbsp;Meng Zhu,&nbsp;Ke Jiang,&nbsp;Houxuan Li,&nbsp;Lang Lei","doi":"10.1186/s13005-023-00375-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures (OGEs) in adult patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred non-extraction adult subjects with less than 5 mm of crowding (mean age, 24.6 ± 3.8 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The subjects were divided into the clear aligner (n = 100) and fixed appliance group (n = 100). The intraoral photographs were utilized to determine the incidence of OGEs in the upper arch between maxillary central incisors, as well as the lower arch between mandibular central incisors. Crown overlap, crown shape, posttreatment root angulation, the distance from the interproximal contact point (ICP) to the alveolar bone crest (ABC) after treatment and interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) were determined in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of OGEs between maxillary and mandibular central incisors after orthodontic treatment was 35.0% and 38.0% in the clear aligner group, respectively, significantly higher than that (18.0% and 24.0%) in the fixed appliance group (P < 0.05). The average area of an OGE after clear aligner treatment was larger both in the maxilla (0.16 ± 0.12mm<sup>2</sup>) and mandible (0.21 ± 0.24mm<sup>2</sup>) compared with that (0.05 ± 0.03mm<sup>2</sup> and 0.05 ± 0.06mm<sup>2</sup>) after fixed appliance treatment (P < 0.05). No difference was found regarding pretreatment crown overlap, crown shape, treatment duration, posttreatment root angulation, amount and distribution of IPR and the distance from ICP to ABC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence and severity of OGEs were higher in adults treated with clear aligners. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of OGEs during treatment with clear aligners.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"19 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00375-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the incidence and severity of open gingival embrasures (OGEs) in adult patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances.

Methods: Two hundred non-extraction adult subjects with less than 5 mm of crowding (mean age, 24.6 ± 3.8 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The subjects were divided into the clear aligner (n = 100) and fixed appliance group (n = 100). The intraoral photographs were utilized to determine the incidence of OGEs in the upper arch between maxillary central incisors, as well as the lower arch between mandibular central incisors. Crown overlap, crown shape, posttreatment root angulation, the distance from the interproximal contact point (ICP) to the alveolar bone crest (ABC) after treatment and interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) were determined in the two groups.

Results: The incidence of OGEs between maxillary and mandibular central incisors after orthodontic treatment was 35.0% and 38.0% in the clear aligner group, respectively, significantly higher than that (18.0% and 24.0%) in the fixed appliance group (P < 0.05). The average area of an OGE after clear aligner treatment was larger both in the maxilla (0.16 ± 0.12mm2) and mandible (0.21 ± 0.24mm2) compared with that (0.05 ± 0.03mm2 and 0.05 ± 0.06mm2) after fixed appliance treatment (P < 0.05). No difference was found regarding pretreatment crown overlap, crown shape, treatment duration, posttreatment root angulation, amount and distribution of IPR and the distance from ICP to ABC.

Conclusions: The incidence and severity of OGEs were higher in adults treated with clear aligners. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of OGEs during treatment with clear aligners.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用透明矫正器和固定矫治器治疗的成人开放性龈囊的发生率和严重程度:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:评估使用透明矫正器和固定矫治器治疗的成人患者开放式牙龈囊膜(OGEs)的发生率和严重程度。方法:回顾性研究200例未拔牙、拥挤程度小于5mm的成人受试者(平均年龄24.6±3.8岁)。将受试者分为透明矫正器组(n = 100)和固定矫治器组(n = 100)。利用口腔内照片确定上颌中切牙之间的上弓以及下颌中切牙之间的下弓的OGEs发生率。测定两组牙冠重叠、牙冠形状、治疗后牙根角度、治疗后近端接触点(ICP)到牙槽骨嵴(ABC)的距离和近端牙釉质还原(IPR)。结果:正畸治疗后上颌中切牙与下颌中切牙间oge发生率为35.0%、38.0%,明显高于固定矫治器组(18.0%、24.0%)(P < 0.05),下颌骨oge发生率(0.21±0.24mm2)明显高于固定矫治器组(0.05±0.03mm2、0.05±0.06mm2) (P < 0.05)。结论:成人使用透明矫治器治疗后oge发生率及严重程度更高。临床医生应该意识到在使用透明矫正器治疗期间发生OGEs的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信