Impact of pretransplantation malnutrition risk on the clinical outcome and graft survival of kidney transplant patients.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Marina Ribeiro de Oliveira Santos, Marcus Faria Lasmar, Evaldo Nascimento, Raquel Aparecida Fabreti-Oliveira
{"title":"Impact of pretransplantation malnutrition risk on the clinical outcome and graft survival of kidney transplant patients.","authors":"Marina Ribeiro de Oliveira Santos, Marcus Faria Lasmar, Evaldo Nascimento, Raquel Aparecida Fabreti-Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0150en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of malnourished patients before transplantation and the influence of malnutrition on graft and patient outcomes remain underestimated, despite being associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to develop an easy nutritional screening tool and evaluate the impact of nutritional status on clinical outcome, graft survival (GS) and mortality risk in kidney transplant patients (KTP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study including 451 KTP, we developed a score by using anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory measures performed in the pretransplant evaluation. The patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the final score: G1 (0 or 1 point)=low risk, G2 (2 to 4 points)=moderate risk, and G3 (>5 points)=high risk of malnutrition. The patients were monitored after transplantation at least 1 to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stratifying the 451 patients based on the pretransplant risk score, G1, G2, and G3 were composed of 90, 292, and 69 patients, respectively. Patients from G1 maintained the lowest serum creatinine levels at hospital discharge when compared with others (p = 0.012). The incidence of infection in the patients from G3 was higher than patients from G1 and G2 (p = 0.030). G3 recipients showed worse GS than G1 patients (p = 0.044). G3 patients showed almost threefold higher risk for graft loss (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.084-7.996).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KTP with higher malnutrition risk score were associated with worse outcomes and GS. The nutritional screening tool is easy to be used in clinical practice to evaluate the patient in preparation for kidney transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0150en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of malnourished patients before transplantation and the influence of malnutrition on graft and patient outcomes remain underestimated, despite being associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to develop an easy nutritional screening tool and evaluate the impact of nutritional status on clinical outcome, graft survival (GS) and mortality risk in kidney transplant patients (KTP).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study including 451 KTP, we developed a score by using anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory measures performed in the pretransplant evaluation. The patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the final score: G1 (0 or 1 point)=low risk, G2 (2 to 4 points)=moderate risk, and G3 (>5 points)=high risk of malnutrition. The patients were monitored after transplantation at least 1 to 10 years.

Results: Stratifying the 451 patients based on the pretransplant risk score, G1, G2, and G3 were composed of 90, 292, and 69 patients, respectively. Patients from G1 maintained the lowest serum creatinine levels at hospital discharge when compared with others (p = 0.012). The incidence of infection in the patients from G3 was higher than patients from G1 and G2 (p = 0.030). G3 recipients showed worse GS than G1 patients (p = 0.044). G3 patients showed almost threefold higher risk for graft loss (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.084-7.996).

Conclusions: KTP with higher malnutrition risk score were associated with worse outcomes and GS. The nutritional screening tool is easy to be used in clinical practice to evaluate the patient in preparation for kidney transplant.

移植前营养不良风险对肾移植患者临床结果和移植物存活率的影响。
背景:移植前营养不良患者的发病率以及营养不良对移植物和患者预后的影响仍被低估,尽管营养不良与较高的术后发病率和死亡率有关。本研究旨在开发一种简便的营养筛查工具,并评估营养状况对肾移植患者(KTP)的临床预后、移植物存活率(GS)和死亡风险的影响:在这项包括 451 名肾移植患者的回顾性队列研究中,我们利用肾移植前评估中的人体测量、临床和实验室测量方法制定了一个评分标准。根据最终得分将患者分为三组:G1(0 或 1 分)= 低风险,G2(2 至 4 分)= 中等风险,G3(> 5 分)= 营养不良高风险。移植后对患者进行了至少 1 至 10 年的监测:根据移植前风险评分对 451 名患者进行分层,G1、G2 和 G3 分别有 90、292 和 69 名患者。与其他患者相比,G1 患者出院时血清肌酐水平最低(P = 0.012)。G3 患者的感染率高于 G1 和 G2 患者(p = 0.030)。与 G1 患者相比,G3 患者的一般状况更差(p = 0.044)。G3患者发生移植物丢失的风险几乎高出三倍(HR 2.94,95% CI 1.084-7.996):结论:营养不良风险评分较高的KTP与较差的预后和GS相关。营养筛查工具易于在临床实践中用于评估肾移植准备患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信