A dialog on common morality in medical ethics in a pluralist setting in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICAL ETHICS
Ladannaz Zahedi, Bagher Larijani, Mohsen Javadi, Shahin Aawani, Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari, Kobra Joodaki, Roya Rashidpouraie, Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani
{"title":"A dialog on common morality in medical ethics in a pluralist setting in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.","authors":"Ladannaz Zahedi,&nbsp;Bagher Larijani,&nbsp;Mohsen Javadi,&nbsp;Shahin Aawani,&nbsp;Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari,&nbsp;Kobra Joodaki,&nbsp;Roya Rashidpouraie,&nbsp;Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v16i3.12972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of common morality is fundamental in medical ethics, and lack of universal content and characteristics of common morality is a product of its multifaceted nature. This study aimed to identify the ideas and experiences of academic faculties regarding common morality in a pluralistic setting to promote conceptual knowledge and strengthen moral reasoning and ethical decision-making. The study was conducted using a qualitative method, employing semi-structured in-depth interviews with thirteen faculty members who were selected purposively. In order to assess their ideas and experiences, the transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using the content analysis method through directed and conventional approaches. The interviews were coded manually. Two themes were reflected in the interviews: ontology and epistemology of common morality. The study indicates that the debate about the subjective or objective dependence of common morality questions the coherence of Beauchamp and Childress' common morality (CM) theory, as common morality is the result of various individual and social factor that influence moral and decision -making in pluralistic environments. Additional studies are needed in order to investigate the effect of cultural, social, theoretical, ideological and individual factors on promoting clinical ethical reasoning and decision-making skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/ce/JMEHM-16-3.PMC10338647.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v16i3.12972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of common morality is fundamental in medical ethics, and lack of universal content and characteristics of common morality is a product of its multifaceted nature. This study aimed to identify the ideas and experiences of academic faculties regarding common morality in a pluralistic setting to promote conceptual knowledge and strengthen moral reasoning and ethical decision-making. The study was conducted using a qualitative method, employing semi-structured in-depth interviews with thirteen faculty members who were selected purposively. In order to assess their ideas and experiences, the transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using the content analysis method through directed and conventional approaches. The interviews were coded manually. Two themes were reflected in the interviews: ontology and epistemology of common morality. The study indicates that the debate about the subjective or objective dependence of common morality questions the coherence of Beauchamp and Childress' common morality (CM) theory, as common morality is the result of various individual and social factor that influence moral and decision -making in pluralistic environments. Additional studies are needed in order to investigate the effect of cultural, social, theoretical, ideological and individual factors on promoting clinical ethical reasoning and decision-making skills.

伊朗多元背景下医学伦理中的共同道德对话:定性内容分析。
共同道德观念是医学伦理学的基础,共同道德缺乏普遍性的内容和特征是其多面性的产物。本研究旨在探讨多元背景下学术界对共同道德的看法和经验,以促进概念知识,加强道德推理和伦理决策。本研究采用定性方法进行,采用半结构化的深度访谈,有目的地选择了13位教员。为了评估他们的想法和经验,通过直接和传统的方法,使用内容分析方法对访谈的文本进行分析。访谈是手工编码的。访谈反映了两个主题:共同道德的本体论和认识论。研究表明,关于共同道德的主观或客观依赖的争论质疑了波尚和柴尔德里斯共同道德理论的一致性,因为共同道德是在多元环境中影响道德和决策的各种个人和社会因素的结果。为了调查文化、社会、理论、思想和个人因素对促进临床伦理推理和决策技能的影响,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信