Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Antonia Sambola, Bruno García Del Blanco, Vijay Kunadian, Birgit Vogel, Alaide Chieffo, María Vidal, Hanna Ratcovich, Giulia Botti, Chris Wilkinson, Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.","authors":"Antonia Sambola,&nbsp;Bruno García Del Blanco,&nbsp;Vijay Kunadian,&nbsp;Birgit Vogel,&nbsp;Alaide Chieffo,&nbsp;María Vidal,&nbsp;Hanna Ratcovich,&nbsp;Giulia Botti,&nbsp;Chris Wilkinson,&nbsp;Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.15420/ecr.2022.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In high-income countries, ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in women and men, accounting for more than 20% of deaths in both sexes. However, women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than men. Women undergoing PCI have poorer unadjusted outcomes because they are older and have greater comorbidity than men, but uncertainty remains whether sex affects outcome after these differences in clinical characteristics are considered. In this paper, we review recent published evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing PCI. We focus on the sex differences in PCI outcomes in different scenarios: acute coronary syndromes, stable angina and complex lesions, including the approach of left main coronary artery. We also review how gender is considered in recent guidelines and offer a common clinical scenario to illustrate the contemporary management strategies an interventional cardiologist should consider when performing PCI on a female patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":45957,"journal":{"name":"European Cardiology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/d4/ecr-18-e06.PMC10345982.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2022.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In high-income countries, ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in women and men, accounting for more than 20% of deaths in both sexes. However, women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than men. Women undergoing PCI have poorer unadjusted outcomes because they are older and have greater comorbidity than men, but uncertainty remains whether sex affects outcome after these differences in clinical characteristics are considered. In this paper, we review recent published evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing PCI. We focus on the sex differences in PCI outcomes in different scenarios: acute coronary syndromes, stable angina and complex lesions, including the approach of left main coronary artery. We also review how gender is considered in recent guidelines and offer a common clinical scenario to illustrate the contemporary management strategies an interventional cardiologist should consider when performing PCI on a female patient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

缺血性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的性别差异
在高收入国家,缺血性心脏病是男女死亡的主要原因,占两性死亡人数的20%以上。然而,女性接受指南推荐的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的可能性低于男性。接受PCI的女性由于年龄较大且合并症多于男性,其未调整的结果较差,但考虑到这些临床特征的差异,性别是否会影响结果仍不确定。在本文中,我们回顾了最近发表的证据,比较了男性和女性接受PCI的结果。我们关注不同情况下PCI结果的性别差异:急性冠状动脉综合征,稳定型心绞痛和复杂病变,包括左冠状动脉主干入路。我们还回顾了最近的指南中如何考虑性别,并提供了一个常见的临床场景来说明介入心脏病专家在对女性患者进行PCI时应该考虑的当代管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Cardiology Review
European Cardiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信