Haemogram indices are as reliable as CURB-65 to assess 30-day mortality in Covid-19 pneumonia.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Okan Bardakci, Murat Das, Gökhan Akdur, Canan Akman, Duygu Siddikoglu, Okhan Akdur, Yavuz Beyazit
{"title":"Haemogram indices are as reliable as CURB-65 to assess 30-day mortality in Covid-19 pneumonia.","authors":"Okan Bardakci,&nbsp;Murat Das,&nbsp;Gökhan Akdur,&nbsp;Canan Akman,&nbsp;Duygu Siddikoglu,&nbsp;Okhan Akdur,&nbsp;Yavuz Beyazit","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_474_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Mortality due to Covid-19 and severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains high, despite progress in critical care management. We compared the precision of CURB-65 score with monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prediction of mortality among patients with Covid-19 and CAP presenting to the emergency department. Methods We retrospectively analysed two cohorts of patients admitted to the emergency department of Canakkale University Hospital, namely (i) Covid-19 patients with severe acute respiratory symptoms presenting between 23 March 2020 and 31 October 2020, and (ii) all patients with CAP either from bacterial or viral infection within the 36 months preceding the Covid-19 pandemic. Mortality was defined as in-hospital death or death occurring within 30 days after discharge. Results The first study group consisted of 324 Covid-19 patients and the second group of 257 CAP patients. The non-survivor Covid-19 group had significantly higher MLR, NLR and PLR values. In univariate analysis, in Covid-19 patients, a 1-unit increase in NLR and PLR was associated with increased mortality, and in multivariate analysis for Covid-19 patients, age and NLR remained significant in the final step of the model. According to this model, we found that in the Covid-19 group an increase in 1-unit in NLR would result in an increase by 5% and 7% in the probability of mortality, respectively. According to pairwise analysis, NLR and PLR are as reliable as CURB-65 in predicting mortality in Covid-19. Conclusions Our study indicates that NLR and PLR may serve as reliable predictive factors as CURB-65 in Covid-19 pneumonia, which could easily be used to triage and manage severe patients in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":49782,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Journal of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Medical Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_474_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Mortality due to Covid-19 and severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains high, despite progress in critical care management. We compared the precision of CURB-65 score with monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prediction of mortality among patients with Covid-19 and CAP presenting to the emergency department. Methods We retrospectively analysed two cohorts of patients admitted to the emergency department of Canakkale University Hospital, namely (i) Covid-19 patients with severe acute respiratory symptoms presenting between 23 March 2020 and 31 October 2020, and (ii) all patients with CAP either from bacterial or viral infection within the 36 months preceding the Covid-19 pandemic. Mortality was defined as in-hospital death or death occurring within 30 days after discharge. Results The first study group consisted of 324 Covid-19 patients and the second group of 257 CAP patients. The non-survivor Covid-19 group had significantly higher MLR, NLR and PLR values. In univariate analysis, in Covid-19 patients, a 1-unit increase in NLR and PLR was associated with increased mortality, and in multivariate analysis for Covid-19 patients, age and NLR remained significant in the final step of the model. According to this model, we found that in the Covid-19 group an increase in 1-unit in NLR would result in an increase by 5% and 7% in the probability of mortality, respectively. According to pairwise analysis, NLR and PLR are as reliable as CURB-65 in predicting mortality in Covid-19. Conclusions Our study indicates that NLR and PLR may serve as reliable predictive factors as CURB-65 in Covid-19 pneumonia, which could easily be used to triage and manage severe patients in the emergency department.

在评估Covid-19肺炎患者30天死亡率方面,血图指标与CURB-65一样可靠。
背景:尽管重症监护管理取得了进展,但Covid-19和严重社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的死亡率仍然很高。我们比较了CURB-65评分与单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)预测急诊Covid-19和CAP患者死亡率的准确性。方法回顾性分析了两组在恰纳卡莱大学医院急急诊就诊的患者,即(i)在2020年3月23日至2020年10月31日期间出现严重急性呼吸道症状的Covid-19患者,以及(ii)在Covid-19大流行之前36个月内因细菌或病毒感染而感染CAP的所有患者。死亡率定义为院内死亡或出院后30天内发生的死亡。结果第一组324例新冠肺炎患者,第二组257例CAP患者。非幸存者Covid-19组的MLR、NLR和PLR值显著高于对照组。在单因素分析中,在Covid-19患者中,NLR和PLR每增加1个单位与死亡率增加相关,在Covid-19患者的多因素分析中,年龄和NLR在模型的最后一步仍然显着。根据该模型,我们发现在Covid-19组中,NLR每增加1个单位,死亡率分别增加5%和7%。根据两两分析,NLR和PLR在预测Covid-19死亡率方面与CURB-65一样可靠。结论NLR和PLR与CURB-65可作为Covid-19肺炎的可靠预测因子,可方便地用于急诊科重症患者的分诊和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
National Medical Journal of India
National Medical Journal of India 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of health policy and health provider training through sections on ‘Medicine and society’ and ‘Medical education’.. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信