{"title":"Evaluation of postoperative bleeding control employing Surgicel: a clinical trial.","authors":"Mohsen Amjadi, Mahdi Hemmati-Ghavshough, Hamed DadashKarimi, Mohsen Mohammad-Rahimi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various techniques have been developed for the rapid control of bleeding as a potential surgical complication. Research shows that the Surgicel has a significant effect on reducing bleeding in most surgeries; however, in our experimental observations on patients undergoing open prostatectomy, not only no significant reduction was seen in the amount of bleeding, but in some cases, Surgicel led to infection. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the Surgicel on infection and bleeding in open prostatectomy was investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients undergoing open prostatectomy were randomly divided into two groups. To control bleeding after suturing the bladder neck, the Surgicel was installed in the first group, while it was not in the second group. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, PT, PTT, INR, bleeding rate, and postoperative complications were evaluated in all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the studied groups, hemoglobin level and hematocrit percentage before surgery and on the first and second days after surgery, along with coagulation status, were compared in terms of PT, PTT, and INR. There were no significant differences between the studied variables and baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed that the Surgicel in open prostatectomy was ineffective in controlling bleeding and can lead to infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"11 2","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165223/pdf/ajceu0011-0177.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Various techniques have been developed for the rapid control of bleeding as a potential surgical complication. Research shows that the Surgicel has a significant effect on reducing bleeding in most surgeries; however, in our experimental observations on patients undergoing open prostatectomy, not only no significant reduction was seen in the amount of bleeding, but in some cases, Surgicel led to infection. Therefore, in this study, the effect of the Surgicel on infection and bleeding in open prostatectomy was investigated.
Materials and methods: Thirty patients undergoing open prostatectomy were randomly divided into two groups. To control bleeding after suturing the bladder neck, the Surgicel was installed in the first group, while it was not in the second group. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, PT, PTT, INR, bleeding rate, and postoperative complications were evaluated in all patients.
Results: In the studied groups, hemoglobin level and hematocrit percentage before surgery and on the first and second days after surgery, along with coagulation status, were compared in terms of PT, PTT, and INR. There were no significant differences between the studied variables and baseline variables.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that the Surgicel in open prostatectomy was ineffective in controlling bleeding and can lead to infection.