Severe congenital T-lymphocytopenia may affect the outcome of neonatal intensive care.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.5507/bp.2023.028
Ivana Hulinkova, Veronika Medova, Andrea Soltysova, Veronika Dobsinska, Andrej Ficek, Peter Ciznar
{"title":"Severe congenital T-lymphocytopenia may affect the outcome of neonatal intensive care.","authors":"Ivana Hulinkova, Veronika Medova, Andrea Soltysova, Veronika Dobsinska, Andrej Ficek, Peter Ciznar","doi":"10.5507/bp.2023.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Circular DNA segments TREC (T-cell receptor excision circles) formed during T-lymphocyte maturation in the thymus, are a sensitive marker of thymic lymphocyte production in a broader manner. Quantification using qPCR is proposed as a surrogate marker of T cell malfunction in various primary and secondary conditions in a non-SCID selected risk newborn population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 207 dry blood spot samples during the years 2015-2018, from newly admitted risk newborns. TREC values calculated per 10<sup>6</sup> cells were determined and a cut-off values of 5th percentile was set. The positive control group consisted of patients (n=13) with genetically confirmed SCID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median TREC value was 34,591.56 (18,074.08-60,228.58) for girls resp. 28,391.20 (13,835.01-51,835.93) per 10<sup>6</sup> cells for boys, P=0.046. Neonates born by C-section have been found to have higher TREC levels compared to neonates born by spontaneous delivery (P=0.018). In the group of preterm newborns (n=104), 3.8% had TREC value < 5<sup>th</sup> percentile, half of them died due to sepsis as opposed to no fatalities in preterm newborns with sepsis and TREC value > 5<sup>th</sup> percentile. In the group of term newborns (n=103) 9 children (8.7%) had TREC < 5<sup>th</sup> percentile, half of them were treated for asphyxia, with no fatal complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TREC levels calculated for the 5th percentile of a risk neonatal group is suggested as a surrogate marker for increased risk of fatal septic complication. Early recognition of these newborns within a risk scoring system using TREC levels could lead to potentially lifesaving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55363,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Papers-Olomouc","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2023.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Circular DNA segments TREC (T-cell receptor excision circles) formed during T-lymphocyte maturation in the thymus, are a sensitive marker of thymic lymphocyte production in a broader manner. Quantification using qPCR is proposed as a surrogate marker of T cell malfunction in various primary and secondary conditions in a non-SCID selected risk newborn population.

Methods: We collected 207 dry blood spot samples during the years 2015-2018, from newly admitted risk newborns. TREC values calculated per 106 cells were determined and a cut-off values of 5th percentile was set. The positive control group consisted of patients (n=13) with genetically confirmed SCID.

Results: The median TREC value was 34,591.56 (18,074.08-60,228.58) for girls resp. 28,391.20 (13,835.01-51,835.93) per 106 cells for boys, P=0.046. Neonates born by C-section have been found to have higher TREC levels compared to neonates born by spontaneous delivery (P=0.018). In the group of preterm newborns (n=104), 3.8% had TREC value < 5th percentile, half of them died due to sepsis as opposed to no fatalities in preterm newborns with sepsis and TREC value > 5th percentile. In the group of term newborns (n=103) 9 children (8.7%) had TREC < 5th percentile, half of them were treated for asphyxia, with no fatal complications.

Conclusion: TREC levels calculated for the 5th percentile of a risk neonatal group is suggested as a surrogate marker for increased risk of fatal septic complication. Early recognition of these newborns within a risk scoring system using TREC levels could lead to potentially lifesaving interventions.

严重的先天性 T 淋巴细胞减少症可能会影响新生儿重症监护的结果。
目的:胸腺中T淋巴细胞成熟过程中形成的环形DNA片段TREC(T细胞受体切割圈)是胸腺淋巴细胞生成的一个敏感标记。我们建议使用 qPCR 进行定量,作为非SCID 特选高危新生儿群体中各种原发性和继发性 T 细胞功能失调的替代标记物:方法:我们在 2015-2018 年期间从新入院的高危新生儿中采集了 207 份干血斑样本。确定了每 106 个细胞计算的 TREC 值,并将临界值设定为第 5 百分位数。阳性对照组包括经基因证实的 SCID 患者(13 人):结果:女孩每 106 个细胞的 TREC 中位值为 34,591.56 (18,074.08-60,228.58),男孩每 106 个细胞的 TREC 中位值为 28,391.20 (13,835.01-51,835.93),P=0.046。与自然分娩的新生儿相比,剖腹产新生儿的 TREC 水平更高(P=0.018)。在早产新生儿组(n=104)中,3.8%的新生儿TREC值小于第5百分位数,其中一半死于败血症,而患有败血症且TREC值大于第5百分位数的早产新生儿则无死亡病例。在足月新生儿组(n=103)中,有9名儿童(8.7%)的TREC值小于第5百分位数,其中一半儿童因窒息接受了治疗,但没有出现致命的并发症:结论:以新生儿风险组第5百分位数计算的TREC水平可作为致命脓毒症并发症风险增加的替代指标。在使用 TREC 水平的风险评分系统中及早识别这些新生儿,可能会导致挽救生命的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Papers is a journal of Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Olomouc, Czech Republic. It includes reviews and original articles reporting on basic and clinical research in medicine. Biomedical Papers is published as one volume per year in four issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信