Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Dana M Johnson, Mira Michels-Gualtieri, Rebecca Gomperts, Abigail R A Aiken
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.","authors":"Dana M Johnson,&nbsp;Mira Michels-Gualtieri,&nbsp;Rebecca Gomperts,&nbsp;Abigail R A Aiken","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate self-reported outcomes and serious adverse events following self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol alone provided from an online service.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective record review of self-managed abortion outcomes using misoprostol obtained from Aid Access, an online telemedicine organization serving United States (US) residents, between June 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020. The main outcomes were the proportion of people who reported ending their pregnancy without instrumentation intervention and the proportion who received treatment for serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1016 people received prescriptions for misoprostol. We obtained follow-up information for 610 (60%) of whom 568 confirmed use of the medication and 42 confirmed non-use. When taking the medication, 96% were at or less than 10 weeks' gestation and 4% were more than 10 weeks. Overall, 88% (95% CI: 84.6-90.2) reported successfully ending their pregnancy without instrumentation intervention. Of the 568 who took the misoprostol, 12 (2%) reported experiencing one or more serious adverse events and 20 (4%) reported experiencing a symptom of a potential complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol provided by an online telemedicine service has a high rate of effectiveness and a low rate of serious adverse events. Outcomes compare favorably to other service delivery models using a similar regimen. As mifepristone continues to be over-regulated and the 2022 US Supreme Court ruling allows states to severely restrict access to in-clinic abortion care, this regimen is a promising option for self-managed abortion in the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate self-reported outcomes and serious adverse events following self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol alone provided from an online service.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective record review of self-managed abortion outcomes using misoprostol obtained from Aid Access, an online telemedicine organization serving United States (US) residents, between June 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020. The main outcomes were the proportion of people who reported ending their pregnancy without instrumentation intervention and the proportion who received treatment for serious adverse events.

Results: During the study period, 1016 people received prescriptions for misoprostol. We obtained follow-up information for 610 (60%) of whom 568 confirmed use of the medication and 42 confirmed non-use. When taking the medication, 96% were at or less than 10 weeks' gestation and 4% were more than 10 weeks. Overall, 88% (95% CI: 84.6-90.2) reported successfully ending their pregnancy without instrumentation intervention. Of the 568 who took the misoprostol, 12 (2%) reported experiencing one or more serious adverse events and 20 (4%) reported experiencing a symptom of a potential complication.

Conclusions: Self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol provided by an online telemedicine service has a high rate of effectiveness and a low rate of serious adverse events. Outcomes compare favorably to other service delivery models using a similar regimen. As mifepristone continues to be over-regulated and the 2022 US Supreme Court ruling allows states to severely restrict access to in-clinic abortion care, this regimen is a promising option for self-managed abortion in the US.

单独使用米索前列醇进行自我管理流产的安全性和有效性,该方法来自美国的在线远程医疗服务。
目的:评估在线服务中单独使用米索前列醇进行自我管理药物流产后的自我报告结局和严重不良事件。研究设计:在2020年6月1日至2020年6月30日期间,我们对使用米索前列醇的自我管理流产结果进行了回顾性记录回顾,这些米索前列醇来自于为美国居民服务的在线远程医疗组织Aid Access。主要结果是报告在没有器械干预的情况下结束妊娠的人数比例和接受严重不良事件治疗的人数比例。结果:在研究期间,1016人接受了米索前列醇处方。我们获得了610人(60%)的随访信息,其中568人确认使用该药物,42人确认未使用。服药时,96%的孕妇妊娠期小于或等于10周,4%的孕妇妊娠期大于10周。总体而言,88% (95% CI: 84.6-90.2)报告在没有器械干预的情况下成功终止妊娠。在568名服用米索前列醇的患者中,12名(2%)报告出现了一个或多个严重不良事件,20名(4%)报告出现了潜在并发症的症状。结论:网络远程医疗服务提供的米索前列醇自主用药流产有效率高,严重不良事件发生率低。结果与使用类似方案的其他服务提供模式比较有利。随着米非司酮继续受到过度监管,以及2022年美国最高法院的裁决允许各州严格限制获得诊所堕胎护理,这种方案是美国自我管理堕胎的一个有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信