Hypersensitivity Reactions to Components of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Their Treatment: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Emma Kealaher, Parin Shah, Tharindra Dissanayake, Dewi E Thomas, James Barry, Andrei D Margulescu
{"title":"Hypersensitivity Reactions to Components of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Their Treatment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Emma Kealaher,&nbsp;Parin Shah,&nbsp;Tharindra Dissanayake,&nbsp;Dewi E Thomas,&nbsp;James Barry,&nbsp;Andrei D Margulescu","doi":"10.15420/aer.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to components of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are rare but difficult to differentiate from device infection. Data on best management strategies of HSRs to CIEDs are lacking. The aims of this systematic review are to summarise the available literature on the aetiology, diagnosis and management of HSR in CIED patients and to provide guidance on best management strategies for these patients. <b>Methods and results:</b> A systematic search for publications on HSR to CIED in PubMed from January 1970 to November 2022 was conducted, resulting in 43 publications reporting on 57 individual cases. The quality of data was low. The mean age was 57 ± 21 years, and 48% of patients were women. The mean time from implant to diagnosis was 29 ± 59 months. Multiple allergens were identified in 11 patients (19%). In 14 cases (25%) no allergen was identified. Blood tests were mostly normal (55%), but eosinophilia (23%), raised inflammatory markers (18%) and raised immunoglobulin E (5%) were also encountered. Symptoms included local reactions, systemic reactions or both in 77%, 21% and 7% of patients, respectively. Explantation of CIED and reimplantation of another CIED coated with a non-allergenic material was usually successful. Use of topical or systemic steroids was associated with high failure rates. <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on the limited data available, the treatment of choice for HSRs to CIEDs is full CIED removal, reassessment of CIED indication and reimplantation of devices coated in non-allergenic materials. Steroids (topical/systemic) have limited efficiency and should not be used. There is an urgent need for further research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":8412,"journal":{"name":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","volume":"12 ","pages":"e08"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/60/35/aer-12-e08.PMC10326667.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to components of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are rare but difficult to differentiate from device infection. Data on best management strategies of HSRs to CIEDs are lacking. The aims of this systematic review are to summarise the available literature on the aetiology, diagnosis and management of HSR in CIED patients and to provide guidance on best management strategies for these patients. Methods and results: A systematic search for publications on HSR to CIED in PubMed from January 1970 to November 2022 was conducted, resulting in 43 publications reporting on 57 individual cases. The quality of data was low. The mean age was 57 ± 21 years, and 48% of patients were women. The mean time from implant to diagnosis was 29 ± 59 months. Multiple allergens were identified in 11 patients (19%). In 14 cases (25%) no allergen was identified. Blood tests were mostly normal (55%), but eosinophilia (23%), raised inflammatory markers (18%) and raised immunoglobulin E (5%) were also encountered. Symptoms included local reactions, systemic reactions or both in 77%, 21% and 7% of patients, respectively. Explantation of CIED and reimplantation of another CIED coated with a non-allergenic material was usually successful. Use of topical or systemic steroids was associated with high failure rates. Conclusion: Based on the limited data available, the treatment of choice for HSRs to CIEDs is full CIED removal, reassessment of CIED indication and reimplantation of devices coated in non-allergenic materials. Steroids (topical/systemic) have limited efficiency and should not be used. There is an urgent need for further research in this field.

Abstract Image

对心脏植入式电子装置组件的过敏反应及其治疗:系统综述。
背景:对心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)部件的超敏反应(HSRs)是罕见的,但很难与器械感染区分开来。缺乏高铁对cied的最佳管理策略的数据。本系统综述的目的是总结关于CIED患者HSR的病因、诊断和管理的现有文献,并为这些患者的最佳管理策略提供指导。方法与结果:系统检索1970年1月至2022年11月PubMed中关于HSR到CIED的出版物,得到43篇报告57例病例的出版物。数据质量较低。平均年龄57±21岁,女性占48%。从种植到诊断的平均时间为29±59个月。11例(19%)患者发现多种过敏原。14例(25%)未发现过敏原。血液检查大多正常(55%),但也遇到嗜酸性粒细胞增多(23%)、炎症标志物升高(18%)和免疫球蛋白E升高(5%)。症状包括局部反应、全身反应或两者兼有,分别为77%、21%和7%的患者。植出CIED后再用非致敏材料覆盖另一个CIED通常是成功的。使用局部或全身类固醇与高失败率相关。结论:根据现有有限的资料,对HSRs进行CIED的治疗选择是完全切除CIED,重新评估CIED的适应症,重新植入非致敏材料涂层的装置。类固醇(局部/全身)疗效有限,不应使用。这一领域迫切需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信