Comparison between Visual Assessment and Longitudinal Strain during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-29 DOI:10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_65_22
Wella Karolina, Amiliana Mardiani Soesanto, B R M Ario Soeryo Kuncoro, Rina Ariani, Estu Rudiktyo, Renan Sukmawan
{"title":"Comparison between Visual Assessment and Longitudinal Strain during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography.","authors":"Wella Karolina,&nbsp;Amiliana Mardiani Soesanto,&nbsp;B R M Ario Soeryo Kuncoro,&nbsp;Rina Ariani,&nbsp;Estu Rudiktyo,&nbsp;Renan Sukmawan","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_65_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between visual assessment and longitudinal strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) remains poorly investigated. This study assessed wall motion segments visually graded as normokinetic, hypokinetic, and akinetic at baseline and the peak of DSE and compared with longitudinal strain between segments with and without induced impaired contractility and improved contractility during DSE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 112 patients examined by DSE, consisting of 58 patients referred for diagnostic study and 54 patients referred for viability study. Regional left ventricular (LV) contractility was assessed visually and longitudinal strain was measured using echocardiography transthoracic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the strain of LV segments was -16.33 ± 6.26 in visually normokinetic, 13.05 ± 6.44 in visually hypokinetic, and -8.46 ± 5.69 in visually akinetic segments. During peak dose, the strain of LV segments was -15.37 ± 6.89 in visually normokinetic, -11.37 ± 5.11 in visually hypokinetic, and -7.37 ± 3.92 in visually akinetic segments. In segments with visually observed impaired contractility, the median longitudinal strain was significantly lower than in segments without impaired contractility. For segments with visually observed improved contractility, the median longitudinal strain was significantly higher than for segments without improved contractility. In diagnostic study, sensitivity of visual assessment for absolute decrease of >2% longitudinal strain was 77%, respectively. In the viability study, the sensitivity was 82% for an absolute decrease of ≥2% longitudinal strain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is good association between strain analysis value and visually assessed wall motion contractility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_65_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between visual assessment and longitudinal strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) remains poorly investigated. This study assessed wall motion segments visually graded as normokinetic, hypokinetic, and akinetic at baseline and the peak of DSE and compared with longitudinal strain between segments with and without induced impaired contractility and improved contractility during DSE.

Methods: This study included 112 patients examined by DSE, consisting of 58 patients referred for diagnostic study and 54 patients referred for viability study. Regional left ventricular (LV) contractility was assessed visually and longitudinal strain was measured using echocardiography transthoracic.

Results: At baseline, the strain of LV segments was -16.33 ± 6.26 in visually normokinetic, 13.05 ± 6.44 in visually hypokinetic, and -8.46 ± 5.69 in visually akinetic segments. During peak dose, the strain of LV segments was -15.37 ± 6.89 in visually normokinetic, -11.37 ± 5.11 in visually hypokinetic, and -7.37 ± 3.92 in visually akinetic segments. In segments with visually observed impaired contractility, the median longitudinal strain was significantly lower than in segments without impaired contractility. For segments with visually observed improved contractility, the median longitudinal strain was significantly higher than for segments without improved contractility. In diagnostic study, sensitivity of visual assessment for absolute decrease of >2% longitudinal strain was 77%, respectively. In the viability study, the sensitivity was 82% for an absolute decrease of ≥2% longitudinal strain.

Conclusions: There is good association between strain analysis value and visually assessed wall motion contractility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图中视觉评估和纵向应变的比较。
背景:多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)中视觉评估与纵向应变之间的关系研究较少。本研究评估了在DSE基线和峰值时视觉上分为正常运动、低运动和无运动的壁运动节段,并与DSE期间诱发收缩力受损和收缩力改善的节段之间的纵向应变进行了比较,包括58名被转诊进行诊断研究的患者和54名被转介进行生存能力研究的患者。视觉评估局部左心室(LV)收缩力,并使用经胸超声心动图测量纵向应变。结果:在基线时,左心室节段的应变在视觉活动正常的节段中为-16.33±6.26,在视觉活动不足的节段为13.05±6.44,在视觉不活动的节段则为-8.46±5.69。在峰值剂量期间,左心室节段的应变在视觉活动正常的节段中为-15.37±6.89,在视觉活动不足的节段为-11.37±5.11,在视觉不活动的节段则为-7.37±3.92。在视觉观察到收缩力受损的节段中,中位纵向应变显著低于收缩力未受损的节。对于视觉观察到收缩性改善的节段,中值纵向应变显著高于收缩性未改善的节。在诊断研究中,视觉评估对>2%纵向应变绝对下降的敏感性分别为77%。在生存力研究中,纵向应变绝对下降≥2%的敏感性为82%。结论:应变分析值与直观评估的壁运动收缩性之间存在良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信