How to Manage Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Protection in an Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator-Dependent Patient Undergoing Palliative Radiotherapy?

IF 0.9 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cihan Öztürk, Efe Yılmaz, Gökay Taylan, Murat Gök, Kenan Yalta
{"title":"How to Manage Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Protection in an Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator-Dependent Patient Undergoing Palliative Radiotherapy?","authors":"Cihan Öztürk, Efe Yılmaz, Gökay Taylan, Murat Gök, Kenan Yalta","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2022.45062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 61-year-old female patient underwent left breast segmental mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma in 2011. Thereafter, trastuzumab therapy was initiated as an adjuvant chemotherapy. However, trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity developed leading to a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value of 25% in the patient. Notably, LVEF did not improve with optimal medical treatment on follow-up. Therefore, decision-making for an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy (for primary prevention) was implemented. Implantable cardiac defibrillator was implanted in the right pectoral region due to left mastectomy and lymph node excision. On follow-up, positron emission computed tomography revealed metastatic lesions involving the anterior upper lobe of the right lung and right infraclavicular lymph nodes. The patient was referred to our clinics due to the fact that she had an ICD generator in the vicinity of the metastatic sites (Figure 1A). This might substantially reduce the effectiveness of planned radiotherapy on this region. Moreover, radiotherapy with a cumulative dose of >5 Gy might potentially hamper the ICD generator. Notably, the calculated dose was seemingly over this threshold according to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 203. Based on the abovementioned challenges, temporary removal of the ICD generator, leaving the leads in place, and reimplantation of the generator in the same region following radiotherapy were considered. However, even though the patient was not dependent on cardiac pacing by the device, the patient might be","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.45062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 61-year-old female patient underwent left breast segmental mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma in 2011. Thereafter, trastuzumab therapy was initiated as an adjuvant chemotherapy. However, trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity developed leading to a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value of 25% in the patient. Notably, LVEF did not improve with optimal medical treatment on follow-up. Therefore, decision-making for an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy (for primary prevention) was implemented. Implantable cardiac defibrillator was implanted in the right pectoral region due to left mastectomy and lymph node excision. On follow-up, positron emission computed tomography revealed metastatic lesions involving the anterior upper lobe of the right lung and right infraclavicular lymph nodes. The patient was referred to our clinics due to the fact that she had an ICD generator in the vicinity of the metastatic sites (Figure 1A). This might substantially reduce the effectiveness of planned radiotherapy on this region. Moreover, radiotherapy with a cumulative dose of >5 Gy might potentially hamper the ICD generator. Notably, the calculated dose was seemingly over this threshold according to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 203. Based on the abovementioned challenges, temporary removal of the ICD generator, leaving the leads in place, and reimplantation of the generator in the same region following radiotherapy were considered. However, even though the patient was not dependent on cardiac pacing by the device, the patient might be
如何在接受姑息性放射治疗的依赖植入式心脏除颤器的患者中管理植入式心脏起搏器保护?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信