Do Won Kim , Hanju Lee , Jeong-Yeon Ji , Ramla Talib Mohammad , Gene Huh , Woo-Jin Jeong , Wonjae Cha
{"title":"Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block in Transcutaneous Vocal Fold Injection: A Pilot Study","authors":"Do Won Kim , Hanju Lee , Jeong-Yeon Ji , Ramla Talib Mohammad , Gene Huh , Woo-Jin Jeong , Wonjae Cha","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div><span>Topical lidocaine remains the mainstay for anesthesia in transcutaneous vocal fold<span> injection (VFI). While using topical lidocaine, laryngologists sometimes encounter uncontrolled reflexes or poor compliance. Superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) provides deep and rapid anesthesia on the </span></span>larynx above the vocal folds and abolishes the glottic closure reflex. Herein, we present a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SLNB for transcutaneous VFI and explored its usefulness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Fifty-nine patients were prospectively anesthetized with SLNB during transcutaneous VFI for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. In the SLNB group, 0.5 to 1 mL of 2% lidocaine was infiltrated on bilateral SLNs through the thyrohyoid membrane. As the control group, we included previous 47 patients who underwent VFI with topical lidocaine. In the control group, 10% lidocaine spray was applied to the laryngopharyngeal </span>mucosa. Demographic data, laryngeal exposure, patient compliance, procedural interruption, and complications were investigated. Patient compliance was evaluated based on the frequency of cough and swallowing during VFI procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>SLNB enabled endoscopic contact on the epiglottis and pharyngeal wall without gag reflex and provided good exposure of the procedure field on the vocal folds. In the SLNB group, the laryngeal exposure is significantly better than in the control (</span><em>P</em> = 0.005). The frequency of cough and swallowing was significantly lower in the SLNB group than in the control (<em>P</em> < 0.001). The number of procedural interruptions was lower in the SLNB group than in the control (<em>P</em> < 0.001). There was no acute or delayed complication related to SLNB such as bleeding, hematoma, delayed sensory/swallowing problems, or unscheduled hospital visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SLNB might be safe and effective for anesthesia in transcutaneous VFI. SLNB could be a good anesthetic option for patients with poor compliance despite the sufficient application of topical lidocaine.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>4</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":"39 5","pages":"Pages 1417.e11-1417.e16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089219972300108X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Topical lidocaine remains the mainstay for anesthesia in transcutaneous vocal fold injection (VFI). While using topical lidocaine, laryngologists sometimes encounter uncontrolled reflexes or poor compliance. Superior laryngeal nerve block (SLNB) provides deep and rapid anesthesia on the larynx above the vocal folds and abolishes the glottic closure reflex. Herein, we present a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SLNB for transcutaneous VFI and explored its usefulness.
Methods
Fifty-nine patients were prospectively anesthetized with SLNB during transcutaneous VFI for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. In the SLNB group, 0.5 to 1 mL of 2% lidocaine was infiltrated on bilateral SLNs through the thyrohyoid membrane. As the control group, we included previous 47 patients who underwent VFI with topical lidocaine. In the control group, 10% lidocaine spray was applied to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Demographic data, laryngeal exposure, patient compliance, procedural interruption, and complications were investigated. Patient compliance was evaluated based on the frequency of cough and swallowing during VFI procedures.
Results
SLNB enabled endoscopic contact on the epiglottis and pharyngeal wall without gag reflex and provided good exposure of the procedure field on the vocal folds. In the SLNB group, the laryngeal exposure is significantly better than in the control (P = 0.005). The frequency of cough and swallowing was significantly lower in the SLNB group than in the control (P < 0.001). The number of procedural interruptions was lower in the SLNB group than in the control (P < 0.001). There was no acute or delayed complication related to SLNB such as bleeding, hematoma, delayed sensory/swallowing problems, or unscheduled hospital visits.
Conclusions
SLNB might be safe and effective for anesthesia in transcutaneous VFI. SLNB could be a good anesthetic option for patients with poor compliance despite the sufficient application of topical lidocaine.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.