A retrospective study on clinical factors influencing intra-fraction motion using volumetric imaging for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Sankar Venkataraman, Michael Abdalmassih, Nikesh Hanumanthappa, Vibhay Pareek, Rashi Kulshrestha, Pascal Lambert, Srinivas Rathod, Jim Butler, Arbind Dubey
{"title":"A retrospective study on clinical factors influencing intra-fraction motion using volumetric imaging for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.","authors":"Sankar Venkataraman,&nbsp;Michael Abdalmassih,&nbsp;Nikesh Hanumanthappa,&nbsp;Vibhay Pareek,&nbsp;Rashi Kulshrestha,&nbsp;Pascal Lambert,&nbsp;Srinivas Rathod,&nbsp;Jim Butler,&nbsp;Arbind Dubey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the spine is challenging due to high-dose gradients sparing the cord in the treatment plans. We present our findings of initial setup error and intrafraction motion from Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 47 patients treated with spine SBRT with a total of 154 fractions following a fractionation schedule of 16 Gy in 1, 24 Gy in 2, and 30 Gy in 5 fractions were part of this study. Pre-treatment CBCT was used for localization of the target and couch shifts were applied based on target volume matching to the planning CT image set. Post-treatment CBCT was acquired for all fractions. Intrafraction motion (IFM) was calculated by matching post-treatment CBCT to planning CT for the target volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Intrafraction motion was 1.6 ± 0.9 mm for the study cohort. The average and standard deviation of intrafraction motion were 0.4 ± 1.1 (AP), 0.3 ± 0.9 (SI) and 0.2 ± 1.2 (RL) respectively. The average Initial setup error tabulated from the offline review showed a mean value of 7.8 ± 5.3 mm. The average and standard deviation of the initial setup error were 2.5 ± 5.5 (AP), 2.4 ± 5.3(SI), and 0.8 ± 4.5(RL) respectively. The correlation of intrafraction motion with body mass index (BMI) and the number of consecutive vertebrae levels did not show any statistical significance, however, there was a significant association with gender as women showed more IFM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study on intrafraction motion from CBCT images reinforced the importance of immobilization and imaging for positioning spine SBRT patients.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The need for CBCT and imagining for positional errors is emphasized while treating with SBRT spine and the need for proper immobilization techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 4","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322170/pdf/rsbrt-8-305.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the spine is challenging due to high-dose gradients sparing the cord in the treatment plans. We present our findings of initial setup error and intrafraction motion from Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

Materials and methods: A total of 47 patients treated with spine SBRT with a total of 154 fractions following a fractionation schedule of 16 Gy in 1, 24 Gy in 2, and 30 Gy in 5 fractions were part of this study. Pre-treatment CBCT was used for localization of the target and couch shifts were applied based on target volume matching to the planning CT image set. Post-treatment CBCT was acquired for all fractions. Intrafraction motion (IFM) was calculated by matching post-treatment CBCT to planning CT for the target volume.

Results: The average Intrafraction motion was 1.6 ± 0.9 mm for the study cohort. The average and standard deviation of intrafraction motion were 0.4 ± 1.1 (AP), 0.3 ± 0.9 (SI) and 0.2 ± 1.2 (RL) respectively. The average Initial setup error tabulated from the offline review showed a mean value of 7.8 ± 5.3 mm. The average and standard deviation of the initial setup error were 2.5 ± 5.5 (AP), 2.4 ± 5.3(SI), and 0.8 ± 4.5(RL) respectively. The correlation of intrafraction motion with body mass index (BMI) and the number of consecutive vertebrae levels did not show any statistical significance, however, there was a significant association with gender as women showed more IFM.

Conclusions: Our study on intrafraction motion from CBCT images reinforced the importance of immobilization and imaging for positioning spine SBRT patients.

Advances in knowledge: The need for CBCT and imagining for positional errors is emphasized while treating with SBRT spine and the need for proper immobilization techniques.

Abstract Image

影响椎体立体定向放射治疗椎体内运动的临床因素的回顾性研究。
目的:脊柱立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是具有挑战性的,因为高剂量梯度在治疗计划中保留了脊髓。我们介绍了锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像的初始设置误差和折射内运动的研究结果。材料和方法:本研究共纳入47例接受脊柱SBRT治疗的患者,共154个部位,分别为16 Gy / 1、24 Gy / 2和30 Gy / 5个部位。利用预处理CBCT对目标进行定位,并基于目标体积匹配对规划CT图像集进行couch shift。治疗后各部位CBCT采集。通过将治疗后的CBCT与目标体积的计划CT相匹配来计算抽吸内运动(IFM)。结果:研究队列的平均屈光度运动为1.6±0.9 mm。平均和标准偏差分别为0.4±1.1 (AP)、0.3±0.9 (SI)和0.2±1.2 (RL)。离线回顾的平均初始设置误差表显示平均值为7.8±5.3 mm。初始设置误差的平均值和标准差分别为2.5±5.5 (AP)、2.4±5.3(SI)和0.8±4.5(RL)。屈光内运动与身体质量指数(BMI)和连续椎节数的相关性无统计学意义,但与性别有显著相关性,女性表现出更多的IFM。结论:我们对CBCT图像中屈光内运动的研究强化了固定和成像对脊柱SBRT患者定位的重要性。知识进展:在SBRT脊柱治疗和适当的固定技术的需要时,强调需要CBCT和定位错误的想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信