How Reliable and Popular are Trabeculectomy Videos on Youtube?

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/meajo.meajo_86_22

Saadet G Irgat, Mehmet S Oruç, Fatih Özcura

{"title":"How Reliable and Popular are Trabeculectomy Videos on Youtube?","authors":"Saadet G Irgat, Mehmet S Oruç, Fatih Özcura","doi":"10.4103/meajo.meajo_86_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Evaluating the quality, dependability, and popularity of YouTube videos about trabeculectomy.Methods: A simulated user search for trabeculectomy videos on YouTube was conducted using the keywords \"trabeculectomy, trabeculectomy surgery for glaucoma, and trabeculectomy surgery.\" Hundred out of the one hundred and fifty videos met the criteria and were analyzed. To assess quality and reliability, each video was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the DISCERN (scale, 1-5), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA; scale, 0-4), and Global Quality (GQ; scale, 1-5) criteria. The popularity of the videos was evaluated by Video Power Index (VPI). Videos were further classified into three groups based on the source of their upload.Results: Of the 100 analyzed videos, 50 were uploaded to the system by doctors, 40 by health institutions and 10 by patients. Fifty-seven percent are videos with surgical content. The mean DISCERN score was 44.84 ± 8.14 the mean JAMA score was 2.08 ± 0.67, and the mean Global Quality score was 2.02 ± 0.72. Although some videos provided adequate information, the majority of the videos were rated as fair. While the DISCERN, JAMA, GQS scores were statistically higher in videos uploaded by doctors than in videos uploaded by patients (P < 0.01), VPI was higher in videos uploaded by patients (P = 0.003). Nonsurgical videos had the highest rate of likes and comments (P < 0.05). No substantial difference in scoring was observed between the 2 independent reviewers (P < 0.05).Conclusion: Videos with high popularity had low information quality and reliability. This situation presupposes video sharing in a more understandable language for patients.","PeriodicalId":18740,"journal":{"name":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_86_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluating the quality, dependability, and popularity of YouTube videos about trabeculectomy.

Methods: A simulated user search for trabeculectomy videos on YouTube was conducted using the keywords "trabeculectomy, trabeculectomy surgery for glaucoma, and trabeculectomy surgery." Hundred out of the one hundred and fifty videos met the criteria and were analyzed. To assess quality and reliability, each video was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the DISCERN (scale, 1-5), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA; scale, 0-4), and Global Quality (GQ; scale, 1-5) criteria. The popularity of the videos was evaluated by Video Power Index (VPI). Videos were further classified into three groups based on the source of their upload.

Results: Of the 100 analyzed videos, 50 were uploaded to the system by doctors, 40 by health institutions and 10 by patients. Fifty-seven percent are videos with surgical content. The mean DISCERN score was 44.84 ± 8.14 the mean JAMA score was 2.08 ± 0.67, and the mean Global Quality score was 2.02 ± 0.72. Although some videos provided adequate information, the majority of the videos were rated as fair. While the DISCERN, JAMA, GQS scores were statistically higher in videos uploaded by doctors than in videos uploaded by patients (P < 0.01), VPI was higher in videos uploaded by patients (P = 0.003). Nonsurgical videos had the highest rate of likes and comments (P < 0.05). No substantial difference in scoring was observed between the 2 independent reviewers (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Videos with high popularity had low information quality and reliability. This situation presupposes video sharing in a more understandable language for patients.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Youtube上的小梁切除术视频有多可靠和受欢迎?

目的:评价YouTube上有关小梁切除术视频的质量、可靠性和受欢迎程度。方法:以“小梁切除术、青光眼小梁切除术、小梁切除术”为关键词，模拟用户在YouTube上搜索小梁切除术视频。150个视频中有100个符合标准，并进行了分析。为了评估质量和可靠性，每个视频都由两位独立的评论者使用DISCERN(量表，1-5)，美国医学协会杂志(JAMA;量表，0-4)，以及全球质量(GQ;量表，1-5)标准。通过视频功率指数(VPI)评价视频的受欢迎程度。根据上传的来源，视频被进一步分为三组。结果:在100个分析视频中，50个由医生上传，40个由卫生机构上传，10个由患者上传。57%是外科手术内容的视频。平均DISCERN评分为44.84±8.14，平均JAMA评分为2.08±0.67，平均Global Quality评分为2.02±0.72。虽然有些视频提供了充分的信息，但大多数视频被评为公平。医生上传视频的DISCERN、JAMA、GQS评分高于患者上传视频(P < 0.01)，而患者上传视频的VPI评分高于患者上传视频(P = 0.003)。非手术视频的点赞率和评论率最高(P < 0.05)。两名独立评论者的评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:高人气视频信息质量和可靠性较低。这种情况的前提是视频共享以一种更容易理解的语言为患者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology (MEAJO), published four times per year in print and online, is an official journal of the Middle East African Council of Ophthalmology (MEACO). It is an international, peer-reviewed journal whose mission includes publication of original research of interest to ophthalmologists in the Middle East and Africa, and to provide readers with high quality educational review articles from world-renown experts. MEAJO, previously known as Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology (MEJO) was founded by Dr Akef El Maghraby in 1993.