Hearing what matters: a case study of meaningful community engagement as a model to inform wellbeing initiatives.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Miriam Sved, Ben Latham, Lyndsey Bateman, Libby Buckingham
{"title":"Hearing what matters: a case study of meaningful community engagement as a model to inform wellbeing initiatives.","authors":"Miriam Sved,&nbsp;Ben Latham,&nbsp;Lyndsey Bateman,&nbsp;Libby Buckingham","doi":"10.17061/phrp3322315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper contributes to the literature about community engagement processes that effectively support wellbeing approaches in government. Type of program or service: The Victorian Council of Social Service's Voices of Victoria Listening Tour ('the Tour') was a state-wide engagement with communities, and focused on people experiencing disadvantage. Delivered in partnership with Neighbourhood Houses Victoria and other community organisations, it sought to hear from lesser-heard voices about what people need for the foundational conditions of a good life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Tour involved facilitated face-to-face sessions in community centres and targeted online sessions with underrepresented cohorts. Essential Media omnibus polling was conducted to test key findings with a wider participant group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Tour illuminated a variety of community needs and priorities, many of which overlap with the World Health Organization's social determinants of health. It revealed that people experiencing disadvantage often face problems that do not fall neatly into traditional government departments or portfolios. This shows the value of a whole-of-government wellbeing approach when addressing genuine community need. Structurally, the most productive elements of the community engagement process involved deliberate consideration of the specific conditions that put community members at their ease and empowered them to engage and participate.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>People experiencing disadvantage are rarely directly heard by policy makers. Designing and refining wellbeing approaches in partnership with diverse communities requires methods of engagement that are themselves contributors to community wellbeing. People are overwhelmingly appreciative of being listened to about what matters to them and of being active participants in decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3322315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This paper contributes to the literature about community engagement processes that effectively support wellbeing approaches in government. Type of program or service: The Victorian Council of Social Service's Voices of Victoria Listening Tour ('the Tour') was a state-wide engagement with communities, and focused on people experiencing disadvantage. Delivered in partnership with Neighbourhood Houses Victoria and other community organisations, it sought to hear from lesser-heard voices about what people need for the foundational conditions of a good life.

Methods: The Tour involved facilitated face-to-face sessions in community centres and targeted online sessions with underrepresented cohorts. Essential Media omnibus polling was conducted to test key findings with a wider participant group.

Results: The Tour illuminated a variety of community needs and priorities, many of which overlap with the World Health Organization's social determinants of health. It revealed that people experiencing disadvantage often face problems that do not fall neatly into traditional government departments or portfolios. This shows the value of a whole-of-government wellbeing approach when addressing genuine community need. Structurally, the most productive elements of the community engagement process involved deliberate consideration of the specific conditions that put community members at their ease and empowered them to engage and participate.

Lessons learnt: People experiencing disadvantage are rarely directly heard by policy makers. Designing and refining wellbeing approaches in partnership with diverse communities requires methods of engagement that are themselves contributors to community wellbeing. People are overwhelmingly appreciative of being listened to about what matters to them and of being active participants in decision making.

倾听重要的事情:有意义的社区参与作为一种模式的案例研究,为福祉倡议提供信息。
目的:本文对有效支持政府福利方法的社区参与过程的文献做出了贡献。项目或服务类型:维多利亚社会服务理事会的维多利亚之声聆听之旅(“之旅”)是全州范围内与社区的接触,重点关注处于不利地位的人们。它与维多利亚社区之家和其他社区组织合作,旨在听取人们对美好生活的基本条件的需求。方法:该研究包括在社区中心便利的面对面会议和针对代表性不足的队列的有针对性的在线会议。Essential Media进行了综合民意调查,以在更广泛的参与者群体中测试主要调查结果。结果:这次旅行阐明了各种社区需求和优先事项,其中许多与世界卫生组织的健康社会决定因素重叠。调查显示,处于不利地位的人往往面临传统政府部门或投资组合无法解决的问题。这表明,在解决真正的社区需求时,政府整体福利方法的价值。从结构上讲,社区参与过程中最具成效的因素包括深思熟虑地考虑让社区成员放松并赋予他们参与和参与的具体条件。经验教训:政策制定者很少直接听取弱势群体的意见。与不同社区合作设计和完善福利方法需要参与方法,这些方法本身就是社区福利的贡献者。人们非常感激别人倾听他们对他们重要的事情,并积极参与决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信