Benchmark Dose Assessment for Coke Oven Emissions-Induced Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Damage Effects*

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
YAN Zhao Fan , GU Zhi Guang , FAN Ya Hui , LI Xin Ling , NIU Ze Ming , DUAN Xiao Ran , Mallah Ali Manthar , ZHANG Qiao , YANG Yong Li , YAO Wu , WANG Wei
{"title":"Benchmark Dose Assessment for Coke Oven Emissions-Induced Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Damage Effects*","authors":"YAN Zhao Fan ,&nbsp;GU Zhi Guang ,&nbsp;FAN Ya Hui ,&nbsp;LI Xin Ling ,&nbsp;NIU Ze Ming ,&nbsp;DUAN Xiao Ran ,&nbsp;Mallah Ali Manthar ,&nbsp;ZHANG Qiao ,&nbsp;YANG Yong Li ,&nbsp;YAO Wu ,&nbsp;WANG Wei","doi":"10.3967/bes2023.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aimed to estimate the benchmark dose (BMD) of coke oven emissions (COEs) exposure based on mitochondrial damage with the mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn) as a biomarker.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 782 subjects were recruited, including 238 controls and 544 exposed workers. The mtDNAcn of peripheral leukocytes was detected through the real-time fluorescence-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Three BMD approaches were used to calculate the BMD of COEs exposure based on the mitochondrial damage and its 95% confidence lower limit (BMDL).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mtDNAcn of the exposure group was lower than that of the control group (0.60 ± 0.29 <em>vs.</em> 1.03 ± 0.31; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). A dose–response relationship was shown between the mtDNAcn damage and COEs. Using the Benchmark Dose Software, the occupational exposure limits (OELs) for COEs exposure in males was 0.00190 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. The OELs for COEs exposure using the BBMD were 0.00170 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for the total population, 0.00158 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for males, and 0.00174 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for females. In possible risk obtained from animal studies (PROAST), the OELs of the total population, males, and females were 0.00184, 0.00178, and 0.00192 mg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on our conservative estimate, the BMDL of mitochondrial damage caused by COEs is 0.002 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. This value will provide a benchmark for determining possible OELs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55364,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Environmental Sciences","volume":"36 6","pages":"Pages 490-500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895398823000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to estimate the benchmark dose (BMD) of coke oven emissions (COEs) exposure based on mitochondrial damage with the mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn) as a biomarker.

Methods

A total of 782 subjects were recruited, including 238 controls and 544 exposed workers. The mtDNAcn of peripheral leukocytes was detected through the real-time fluorescence-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Three BMD approaches were used to calculate the BMD of COEs exposure based on the mitochondrial damage and its 95% confidence lower limit (BMDL).

Results

The mtDNAcn of the exposure group was lower than that of the control group (0.60 ± 0.29 vs. 1.03 ± 0.31; P < 0.001). A dose–response relationship was shown between the mtDNAcn damage and COEs. Using the Benchmark Dose Software, the occupational exposure limits (OELs) for COEs exposure in males was 0.00190 mg/m3. The OELs for COEs exposure using the BBMD were 0.00170 mg/m3 for the total population, 0.00158 mg/m3 for males, and 0.00174 mg/m3 for females. In possible risk obtained from animal studies (PROAST), the OELs of the total population, males, and females were 0.00184, 0.00178, and 0.00192 mg/m3 respectively.

Conclusion

Based on our conservative estimate, the BMDL of mitochondrial damage caused by COEs is 0.002 mg/m3. This value will provide a benchmark for determining possible OELs.

焦炉排放诱导线粒体DNA拷贝数损伤效应的基准剂量评估*
目的本研究旨在以线粒体DNA拷贝数(mtDNAcn)为生物标志物,基于线粒体损伤来估计焦炉排放物(COEs)暴露的基准剂量(BMD)。方法共招募782名受试者,包括238名对照和544名暴露工人。采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测外周血白细胞mtDNAcn。基于线粒体损伤及其95%置信下限(BMDL),采用三种BMD方法计算COEs暴露的BMD。结果暴露组的mtDNAcn低于对照组(0.60±0.29 vs.1.03±0.31;P<;0.001)。使用基准剂量软件,男性COE暴露的职业暴露限值(OEL)为0.00190 mg/m3。使用BBMD的COE暴露的OEL为0.00170 mg/m3(总人群)、0.00158 mg/m3(男性)和0.00174 mg/m3(女性)。在动物研究(PROAST)获得的可能风险中,总人群、雄性和雌性的OEL分别为0.00184、0.00178和0.00192 mg/m3。结论根据我们的保守估计,COEs引起的线粒体损伤的BMDL为0.002mg/m3。该值将为确定可能的OEL提供基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
2170
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical and Environmental Sciences (BES) is a peer-reviewed journal jointly established by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) and the Coulston International Corporation (CIC), USA in 1988, and is published monthly by Elsevier. It is indexed by SCI, PubMed, and CA. Topics covered by BES include infectious disease prevention, chronic and non-communicable disease prevention, disease control based on preventive medicine, and public health theories. It also focuses on the health impacts of environmental factors in people''s daily lives and work, including air quality, occupational hazards, and radiation hazards. Article types considered for publication include original articles, letters to the editor, reviews, research highlights, and policy forum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信