A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An In vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
Komal Khare, Prashant Bhusari, Abhishek Soni, Sachin K Malagi, Dennis Abraham, Lynn Johnson
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis Containing Toothpastes on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion with and Without Use of an Adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser: An <i>In vitro</i> Scanning Electron Microscope Study.","authors":"Komal Khare, Prashant Bhusari, Abhishek Soni, Sachin K Malagi, Dennis Abraham, Lynn Johnson","doi":"10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","volume":"11 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/27/JMAU-11-41.PMC10153734.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_133_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction: Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a common chronic condition that affects a high proportion of the adult population and is one of the main reasons why patients seek dental opinion and treatment. Despite considerable success in reducing DH, unfortunately, most of the present methods can provide only temporary and unpredictable desensitization. Therefore, new treatment methods that are effective for long periods and at the same time do not have the complications are needed. Recently, two new desensitizing agents BioMin F and Propolis have been introduced for the treatment of DH.
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of BioMin F and Propolis containing toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion with and without the use of an adjunct 810 nm Diode Laser.
Materials and methods: Forty-five freshly extracted teeth were taken out of which thirty were sectioned into halves and divided into four test groups BioMin F, Propolis, BioMin F + Laser, and Propolis + Laser and control group. All the specimens were treated twice a day for 7 days and then evaluated under scanning electron microscope for partial and complete dentinal tubule occlusion.
Results: A significantly higher number of completely occluded tubules were seen in BioMin F + laser group followed by Propolis + laser, Biomin F, and Propolis.
Conclusion: Combination approach of desensitizing agent and laser provided a better result than the desensitizing agent alone and when compared individually Biomin F was more effective desensitizer as compared to Propolis.
牙本质过敏(DH)是一种常见的慢性疾病,影响了很大比例的成年人,是患者寻求牙科意见和治疗的主要原因之一。尽管在降低DH方面取得了相当大的成功,但不幸的是,目前大多数方法只能提供暂时和不可预测的脱敏。因此,需要长期有效且无并发症的新治疗方法。最近,两种新的脱敏剂BioMin F和蜂胶被引入治疗DH。目的:比较和评价含百奥敏F牙膏和含蜂胶牙膏在辅助使用和不使用810 nm二极管激光的情况下对牙本质小管闭塞的疗效。材料与方法:取45颗新拔牙,其中30颗切成两半,分为BioMin F组、蜂胶组、BioMin F + Laser组、蜂胶+ Laser组和对照组。每天治疗2次,连续治疗7 d,然后在扫描电镜下观察部分和完全牙小管闭塞情况。结果:BioMin F +激光组完全闭塞小管数量显著高于蜂胶+激光组、BioMin F +蜂胶组。结论:激光与脱敏剂联合使用的脱敏效果优于单用脱敏剂,且百奥敏F脱敏效果优于蜂胶。