Cost-effectiveness of patient specific vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Isobel M Dorling, Lars Geenen, Marion J L F Heymans, Jasper Most, Bert Boonen, Martijn G M Schotanus
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of patient specific <i>vs</i> conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Isobel M Dorling,&nbsp;Lars Geenen,&nbsp;Marion J L F Heymans,&nbsp;Jasper Most,&nbsp;Bert Boonen,&nbsp;Martijn G M Schotanus","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past years, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been implemented and routinely used. No clear answer has been given on its associated cost and cost-effectiveness when compared to conventional instrumentation (CI) for TKA.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of PSI TKA compared to CI TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed in healthcare, economical healthcare, and medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit). It was conducted in April 2021 and again in January 2022. Relevant literature included randomised controlled trials, retrospective studies, prospective studies, observational studies, and case control studies. All studies were assessed on methodological quality. Relevant outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years, total costs, imaging costs, production costs, sterilization associated costs, surgery duration costs and readmission rate costs. All eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with sufficient data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies were included into the systematic review. Two were included in the meta-analysis. 3994 PSI TKAs and 13267 CI TKAs were included in the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies, based on Consensus on Health Economic Criteria-scores and risk of bias, ranged from average to good. PSI TKA costs less than CI TKA when considering mean operating room time and its associated costs and tray sterilization per patient case. PSI TKA costs more compared to CI TKA when considering imaging and production costs. Considering total costs per patient case, PSI TKA is more expensive in comparison to CI TKA. Meta-analysis comparing total costs for PSI TKA, and CI TKA showed a significant higher cost for PSI TKA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cost for PSI and CI TKA can differ when considering distinct aspects of their implementation. Total costs per patient case are increased for PSI TKA when compared to CI TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"14 6","pages":"458-470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/28/WJO-14-458.PMC10292058.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Over the past years, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been implemented and routinely used. No clear answer has been given on its associated cost and cost-effectiveness when compared to conventional instrumentation (CI) for TKA.

Aim: To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of PSI TKA compared to CI TKA.

Methods: A literature search was performed in healthcare, economical healthcare, and medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit). It was conducted in April 2021 and again in January 2022. Relevant literature included randomised controlled trials, retrospective studies, prospective studies, observational studies, and case control studies. All studies were assessed on methodological quality. Relevant outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years, total costs, imaging costs, production costs, sterilization associated costs, surgery duration costs and readmission rate costs. All eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with sufficient data.

Results: Thirty-two studies were included into the systematic review. Two were included in the meta-analysis. 3994 PSI TKAs and 13267 CI TKAs were included in the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies, based on Consensus on Health Economic Criteria-scores and risk of bias, ranged from average to good. PSI TKA costs less than CI TKA when considering mean operating room time and its associated costs and tray sterilization per patient case. PSI TKA costs more compared to CI TKA when considering imaging and production costs. Considering total costs per patient case, PSI TKA is more expensive in comparison to CI TKA. Meta-analysis comparing total costs for PSI TKA, and CI TKA showed a significant higher cost for PSI TKA.

Conclusion: Cost for PSI and CI TKA can differ when considering distinct aspects of their implementation. Total costs per patient case are increased for PSI TKA when compared to CI TKA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全膝关节置换术中患者特异性与常规器械的成本-效果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:在过去的几年中,全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者专用内固定(PSI)已被实施并常规使用。与TKA的传统仪器(CI)相比,其相关成本和成本效益没有明确的答案。目的:比较PSI TKA与CI TKA的成本和成本效益。方法:在医疗保健、经济医疗和医学数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、EconLit)中进行文献检索。分别于2021年4月和2022年1月进行。相关文献包括随机对照试验、回顾性研究、前瞻性研究、观察性研究和病例对照研究。对所有研究的方法学质量进行评估。相关结果包括增量成本-效果比、质量调整生命年、总成本、影像学成本、生产成本、灭菌相关成本、手术持续时间成本和再入院率成本。对所有符合条件的研究进行偏倚风险评估。对数据充足的结果进行meta分析。结果:32项研究被纳入系统评价。其中2例纳入meta分析。样本容量中包含3994个PSI tka和13267个CI tka。纳入研究的方法学质量基于健康经济标准共识评分和偏倚风险,范围从平均到良好。当考虑到平均手术室时间及其相关费用和每个患者的托盘消毒时,PSI TKA的成本低于CI TKA。在考虑成像和生产成本时,PSI TKA比CI TKA成本更高。考虑到每例患者的总费用,PSI TKA比CI TKA更昂贵。meta分析比较了PSI TKA和CI TKA的总成本,发现PSI TKA的成本显著高于CI TKA。结论:PSI和CI TKA的成本在考虑其实施的不同方面时会有所不同。与CI TKA相比,PSI TKA的每例患者总费用增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信