[Staying Healthy While Caregiving at Home? Risk and Protective Factors for Dysfunctional Coping in Family Caregivers].

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1984-8250
Carolin Donath, Anna Pendergrass, Elmar Gräßel
{"title":"[Staying Healthy While Caregiving at Home? Risk and Protective Factors for Dysfunctional Coping in Family Caregivers].","authors":"Carolin Donath,&nbsp;Anna Pendergrass,&nbsp;Elmar Gräßel","doi":"10.1055/a-1984-8250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Germany, 3.3 million people in need of care are cared for at home. More than half (54%) of informal caregivers estimate their own stress as high or very high [1]. Coping strategies, including dysfunctional ones, are used to cope with stress. These bear the risk of negative health consequences. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency of dysfunctional coping strategies among informal caregivers and to identify protective and risk factors for these unfavorable coping mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with N=961 interviewed informal caregivers in Bavaria was conducted in 2020. Dysfunctional coping strategies (substance use and abandonment/avoidance) were assessed. Additionally, subjective stress, positive aspects of caregiving, caregiving motives, characteristics of the caregiving situation as well as caregivers' cognitive evaluation of the care situation and their subjective assessment of available resources (based on the Transactional Stress Model) were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the frequency of dysfunctional coping behavior. Linear regressions were run, after statistical precondition testing, to investigate which predictors can be identified for dysfunctional coping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14.7% of respondents reported using alcohol or other substances at least some of the time in difficult situations, and 47.4% of respondents had given up dealing with the care situation. Subjective caregiver burden (p<0.001), the motive to care out of obligation (p=0.035), and resources for manageability of the caregiving situation rated as insufficient (p=0.029) were identified as risk factors for dysfunctional coping in a significant overall model with medium fit (F (10)=16.776; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Dysfunctional coping concerning the stress related to the caregiving situation is not uncommon. The most promising target for intervention is subjective caregiver burden. This is known to be reduced by the use of formal and informal help [2, 3]. However, this requires overcoming the problem of low rates of use of counseling and other support services [4]. Newer digital promising approaches to this are being developed [5, 6].</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1984-8250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In Germany, 3.3 million people in need of care are cared for at home. More than half (54%) of informal caregivers estimate their own stress as high or very high [1]. Coping strategies, including dysfunctional ones, are used to cope with stress. These bear the risk of negative health consequences. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency of dysfunctional coping strategies among informal caregivers and to identify protective and risk factors for these unfavorable coping mechanisms.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with N=961 interviewed informal caregivers in Bavaria was conducted in 2020. Dysfunctional coping strategies (substance use and abandonment/avoidance) were assessed. Additionally, subjective stress, positive aspects of caregiving, caregiving motives, characteristics of the caregiving situation as well as caregivers' cognitive evaluation of the care situation and their subjective assessment of available resources (based on the Transactional Stress Model) were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the frequency of dysfunctional coping behavior. Linear regressions were run, after statistical precondition testing, to investigate which predictors can be identified for dysfunctional coping.

Results: 14.7% of respondents reported using alcohol or other substances at least some of the time in difficult situations, and 47.4% of respondents had given up dealing with the care situation. Subjective caregiver burden (p<0.001), the motive to care out of obligation (p=0.035), and resources for manageability of the caregiving situation rated as insufficient (p=0.029) were identified as risk factors for dysfunctional coping in a significant overall model with medium fit (F (10)=16.776; p<0.001).

Discussion and conclusion: Dysfunctional coping concerning the stress related to the caregiving situation is not uncommon. The most promising target for intervention is subjective caregiver burden. This is known to be reduced by the use of formal and informal help [2, 3]. However, this requires overcoming the problem of low rates of use of counseling and other support services [4]. Newer digital promising approaches to this are being developed [5, 6].

分享
查看原文
在家照顾的同时保持健康?家庭照顾者功能失调应对的风险与保护因素[j]。
目的:在德国,330万需要照顾的人在家里得到照顾。超过一半(54%)的非正式照顾者估计自己的压力很高或非常高[1]。应对策略,包括不正常的策略,都是用来应对压力的。这些都有对健康产生负面影响的风险。本研究的目的是评估非正规照顾者中功能失调应对策略的频率,并确定这些不利应对机制的保护和风险因素。方法:于2020年在巴伐利亚州对N=961名非正式护理人员进行横断面研究。评估了功能失调的应对策略(药物使用和放弃/回避)。此外,还记录了主观压力、照护的积极方面、照护动机、照护情境特征以及照护者对照护情境的认知评价和对可用资源的主观评价(基于交易压力模型)。采用描述性统计的方法探讨不良应对行为的发生频率。在统计前提条件检验后,进行线性回归,以研究哪些预测因素可以被识别为功能失调的应对。结果:14.7%的受访者报告说,在困难的情况下至少有一段时间使用酒精或其他物质,47.4%的受访者放弃了处理护理情况。主观照顾者负担(p)讨论与结论:与照顾情境有关的压力的功能失调应对并不罕见。最有希望的干预目标是主观照顾者负担。这可以通过使用正式和非正式的帮助来减少[2,3]。然而,这需要克服咨询和其他支持服务使用率低的问题[4]。正在开发新的有希望的数字方法[5,6]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信