Trend, prevalence and predictors of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bikila Balis, Habtamu Bekele, Aboma Diriba Hunde, Lemesa Abdisa, Magarsa Lami
{"title":"Trend, prevalence and predictors of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bikila Balis, Habtamu Bekele, Aboma Diriba Hunde, Lemesa Abdisa, Magarsa Lami","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihad048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is an alternative to a caesarean section (CS) in the absence of repeat or new indications for primary CS. There is a knowledge gap regarding the trend and successful VBAC in Ethiopia. Therefore this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the trend, pooled prevalence of successful VBAC and its predictors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (SCOPUS, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science), Google Scholar and lists of references were used to search works of literature in Ethiopia. Stata version 14 was used for analysis and the odds ratios of the outcome variable were determined using the random effects model. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed by computing values for I2 and p-values. Also, sensitivity analyses and funnel plots were done to assess the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies with a sample size of 2080 were included in this study. The overall success rate of VBAC was 52% (95% confidence interval 42 to 65). Cervical dilatation ≥4 cm at admission, having a prior successful vaginal delivery and VBAC were the predictors of successful VBAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses showed the stability of the pooled odds ratios and the funnel plots did not show publication bias. The pooled prevalence of successful VBAC was relatively low compared with existing evidence. However, the rate was increasing over the last 3 decades, which implies it needs more strengthening and focus to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality by CS complications. Promoting VBAC by emphasizing factors favourable for its success during counselling mothers who previously delivered by CS to enhance the prevalence of VBAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":"371-379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihad048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is an alternative to a caesarean section (CS) in the absence of repeat or new indications for primary CS. There is a knowledge gap regarding the trend and successful VBAC in Ethiopia. Therefore this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the trend, pooled prevalence of successful VBAC and its predictors in Ethiopia.

Methods: Electronic databases (SCOPUS, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science), Google Scholar and lists of references were used to search works of literature in Ethiopia. Stata version 14 was used for analysis and the odds ratios of the outcome variable were determined using the random effects model. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed by computing values for I2 and p-values. Also, sensitivity analyses and funnel plots were done to assess the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, respectively.

Results: A total of 12 studies with a sample size of 2080 were included in this study. The overall success rate of VBAC was 52% (95% confidence interval 42 to 65). Cervical dilatation ≥4 cm at admission, having a prior successful vaginal delivery and VBAC were the predictors of successful VBAC.

Conclusions: Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses showed the stability of the pooled odds ratios and the funnel plots did not show publication bias. The pooled prevalence of successful VBAC was relatively low compared with existing evidence. However, the rate was increasing over the last 3 decades, which implies it needs more strengthening and focus to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality by CS complications. Promoting VBAC by emphasizing factors favourable for its success during counselling mothers who previously delivered by CS to enhance the prevalence of VBAC.

埃塞俄比亚剖腹产后成功阴道分娩的趋势、发生率和预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:剖腹产后阴道分娩(VBAC)是在没有重复或新的初次剖腹产指征的情况下,剖腹产的替代方法。在埃塞俄比亚,有关 VBAC 的趋势和成功率的知识还很匮乏。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估埃塞俄比亚VBAC的趋势、成功率及其预测因素:使用电子数据库(SCOPUS、CINAHL、Embase、PubMed 和 Web of Science)、Google Scholar 和参考文献列表搜索埃塞俄比亚的文献作品。使用 Stata 14 版本进行分析,并使用随机效应模型确定结果变量的几率比。通过计算 I2 值和 p 值来评估研究之间的异质性。此外,还进行了敏感性分析和漏斗图,以分别评估汇总值对异常值和发表偏倚的稳定性:本研究共纳入了 12 项研究,样本量为 2080 个。VBAC的总体成功率为52%(95%置信区间为42-65)。入院时宫颈扩张≥4厘米、曾成功经阴道分娩和VBAC是预测VBAC成功的因素:元分析和敏感性分析表明,汇总的几率比是稳定的,漏斗图也未显示出版偏倚。与现有证据相比,VBAC成功率相对较低。然而,在过去的 30 年中,VBAC 的成功率在不断上升,这意味着需要进一步加强和重视 VBAC,以降低 CS 并发症导致的孕产妇发病率和死亡率。在向曾进行过 CS 分娩的母亲提供咨询时,应强调有利于 VBAC 成功的因素,从而提高 VBAC 的普及率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信