Discipline-level differences in mental health provider perceptions of video and phone telehealth.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1037/ser0000791
Samantha L Connolly, Michael E Charness, Allen L Gifford, Christopher J Miller
{"title":"Discipline-level differences in mental health provider perceptions of video and phone telehealth.","authors":"Samantha L Connolly, Michael E Charness, Allen L Gifford, Christopher J Miller","doi":"10.1037/ser0000791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 led to a rapid increase in telemental health care via video or phone. It is important to examine contributors to the choice of video versus phone, as video may be more effective and preferred by patients. Medical mental health (MH) providers (e.g., psychiatrists) may conduct more phone and less video visits than nonmedical MH providers (e.g., psychologists). This study examined whether medical and nonmedical providers' perceptions of the quality and complexity of phone and video MH care may contribute to differences in use. A 32-item survey of 414 providers (79.5% response rate) assessed perceptions of care quality, factors contributing to modality choice, and telehealth challenges. The types of visits completed by providers in the months prior to the survey were extracted from administrative data. Medical and nonmedical providers generally viewed video care as higher quality and more preferred than phone, although to a lesser extent among medical providers. Nonmedical providers' decision making was more impacted by research regarding the modalities' relative effectiveness. Medical providers more frequently endorsed video challenges, including patient technical difficulties and lack of patient training. Administrative data demonstrated that medical providers conducted fewer video appointments than nonmedical providers. Medical providers may be less aware of research demonstrating that video care is effective and preferred by patients, and the complexity of video visits may be a barrier to use. Streamlining video processes, increasing technical support, and disseminating research that compares the quality of video and phone care may increase video use among medical providers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10787026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 led to a rapid increase in telemental health care via video or phone. It is important to examine contributors to the choice of video versus phone, as video may be more effective and preferred by patients. Medical mental health (MH) providers (e.g., psychiatrists) may conduct more phone and less video visits than nonmedical MH providers (e.g., psychologists). This study examined whether medical and nonmedical providers' perceptions of the quality and complexity of phone and video MH care may contribute to differences in use. A 32-item survey of 414 providers (79.5% response rate) assessed perceptions of care quality, factors contributing to modality choice, and telehealth challenges. The types of visits completed by providers in the months prior to the survey were extracted from administrative data. Medical and nonmedical providers generally viewed video care as higher quality and more preferred than phone, although to a lesser extent among medical providers. Nonmedical providers' decision making was more impacted by research regarding the modalities' relative effectiveness. Medical providers more frequently endorsed video challenges, including patient technical difficulties and lack of patient training. Administrative data demonstrated that medical providers conducted fewer video appointments than nonmedical providers. Medical providers may be less aware of research demonstrating that video care is effective and preferred by patients, and the complexity of video visits may be a barrier to use. Streamlining video processes, increasing technical support, and disseminating research that compares the quality of video and phone care may increase video use among medical providers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

心理健康提供者对视频和电话远程健康认知的学科水平差异。
新冠肺炎导致通过视频或电话进行远程精神卫生保健的迅速增加。重要的是要检查视频与电话的选择,因为视频可能更有效,更受患者喜爱。医学心理健康(MH)提供者(如精神科医生)可能比非医学心理健康提供者(如心理学家)进行更多的电话访问和更少的视频访问。这项研究调查了医疗和非医疗提供者对电话和视频MH护理的质量和复杂性的看法是否会导致使用差异。一项针对414名提供者的32项调查(79.5%的应答率)评估了对护理质量的看法、影响模式选择的因素以及远程医疗挑战。提供者在调查前几个月完成的访问类型是从行政数据中提取的。医疗和非医疗提供者通常认为视频护理比电话更高质量,更受欢迎,尽管在医疗提供者中的程度较低。非医疗提供者的决策更受有关模式相对有效性的研究的影响。医疗提供者更频繁地支持视频挑战,包括患者的技术困难和缺乏患者培训。行政数据显示,医疗服务提供者比非医疗服务提供者进行的视频预约更少。医疗提供者可能不太清楚有研究表明视频护理是有效的,也是患者的首选,视频就诊的复杂性可能是使用的障碍。简化视频流程,增加技术支持,传播比较视频和电话护理质量的研究,可能会增加医疗提供者对视频的使用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信