A curvilinear association between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy in psychotherapy.

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Journal of Counseling Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1037/cou0000696
Jonathan Him Nok Lee, Eddie S K Chong, Harold Chui, Tan Lee, Sarah Luk, Dehua Tao, Nicolette Wing Tung Lee
{"title":"A curvilinear association between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy in psychotherapy.","authors":"Jonathan Him Nok Lee,&nbsp;Eddie S K Chong,&nbsp;Harold Chui,&nbsp;Tan Lee,&nbsp;Sarah Luk,&nbsp;Dehua Tao,&nbsp;Nicolette Wing Tung Lee","doi":"10.1037/cou0000696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the relationships between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy. Discourse particles, commonly found in non-English languages, are verbal elements that constitute metacommunication by encoding speakers' emotions and attitudes, which are typically expressed by nonverbal behaviors (e.g., intonation, tone, facial expression, nodding). We hypothesize an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy, given the notion that an optimal level of therapists' emotion in psychotherapy can facilitate clients' inner experiencing and self-expression. Four psychotherapy sessions each from 39 therapist-client dyads were analyzed. After each session, therapist empathy was rated by trained observers using the Therapist Empathy Scale (TES) and by clients using the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (BLRI). Multilevel modeling shows that both the person-level negative quadratic term and positive linear term for therapists' usage of discourse particles are significant in predicting mean TES with large effect sizes. The same predictors do not yield significant results in predicting mean BLRI but they trend in similar directions of associations with medium effect sizes. Our results suggest the optimal usage of discourse particles by therapists is around 20.3% (out of all utterances). The nonsignificant results in BLRI may be attributed to the relatively small sample size of our data and the noncommunication orientation of the client-rated measure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy. Discourse particles, commonly found in non-English languages, are verbal elements that constitute metacommunication by encoding speakers' emotions and attitudes, which are typically expressed by nonverbal behaviors (e.g., intonation, tone, facial expression, nodding). We hypothesize an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between therapists' use of discourse particles and therapist empathy, given the notion that an optimal level of therapists' emotion in psychotherapy can facilitate clients' inner experiencing and self-expression. Four psychotherapy sessions each from 39 therapist-client dyads were analyzed. After each session, therapist empathy was rated by trained observers using the Therapist Empathy Scale (TES) and by clients using the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (BLRI). Multilevel modeling shows that both the person-level negative quadratic term and positive linear term for therapists' usage of discourse particles are significant in predicting mean TES with large effect sizes. The same predictors do not yield significant results in predicting mean BLRI but they trend in similar directions of associations with medium effect sizes. Our results suggest the optimal usage of discourse particles by therapists is around 20.3% (out of all utterances). The nonsignificant results in BLRI may be attributed to the relatively small sample size of our data and the noncommunication orientation of the client-rated measure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

治疗师在心理治疗中使用话语助词与治疗师移情之间的曲线关联。
本研究探讨治疗师话语助词的使用与治疗师移情之间的关系。语篇助词通常存在于非英语语言中,是通过编码说话者的情绪和态度来构成元沟通的言语元素,这些情绪和态度通常通过非言语行为(如语调、语气、面部表情、点头)来表达。鉴于治疗师在心理治疗中的最佳情绪水平可以促进客户的内心体验和自我表达,我们假设治疗师对话语颗粒的使用与治疗师移情之间存在倒U型曲线关系。对39名治疗师-客户二人组的四次心理治疗进行了分析。每次治疗后,治疗师的同理心由受过训练的观察者使用治疗师同理心量表(TES)进行评分,并由客户使用Barrett Lennard关系量表(BLRI)进行评分。多层次建模表明,治疗师话语颗粒使用的人水平负二次项和正线性项在预测具有大效应大小的平均TES方面都是显著的。相同的预测因子在预测平均BLRI方面没有产生显著的结果,但它们与中等效应大小的关联方向相似。我们的研究结果表明,治疗师对话语助词的最佳使用率约为20.3%(在所有话语中)。BLRI中的非显著结果可能归因于我们数据的样本量相对较小,以及客户评分测量的非沟通取向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信