Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Tao Du, Shun Zhang, Xi-Mao Cui, Ren-Hao Hu, Hai-Yan Wang, Jian-Juan Jiang, Jun Zhao, Lan Zhong, Xiao-Hua Jiang
{"title":"Comparison of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Tao Du,&nbsp;Shun Zhang,&nbsp;Xi-Mao Cui,&nbsp;Ren-Hao Hu,&nbsp;Hai-Yan Wang,&nbsp;Jian-Juan Jiang,&nbsp;Jun Zhao,&nbsp;Lan Zhong,&nbsp;Xiao-Hua Jiang","doi":"10.1155/2023/6351330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our objective was to compare the value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) with the new imaging agent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and the traditional imaging agent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG for the preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscopy in gastrointestinal surgery at our hospital from June 2020 to January 2021 were analyzed. All patients underwent simultaneous [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI. The standard uptake value (SUV), fat removal standard uptake value (SUL), and diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for primary and metastatic lesions were compared, and their diagnostic value for different lymph node dissection stages was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients in this cohort was 68 years. Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery, and 11 patients underwent gastroscopic biopsy. The SUV<sub>max</sub> of primary lesions in the FDG group and the FAPI group was 5.74 ± 5.09 and 8.06 ± 4.88, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.01); SUL<sub>max</sub> values were 3.52 ± 2.80 and 5.64 ± 3.25, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The SUV<sub>max</sub> of metastases in the two groups was 3.81 ± 3.08 and 5.17 ± 2.80, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The diagnostic sensitivities for primary lesions in the FDG group and the FAPI group were 0.72 and 0.94, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Combined with postoperative pathological staging, there was no difference in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of lymph node staging between the FDG and FAPI groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the traditional imaging agent, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 has better diagnostic efficiency but no substantial advantage for preoperative lymph node staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118892/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6351330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to compare the value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) with the new imaging agent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and the traditional imaging agent [18F]FDG for the preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Methods: Forty patients with gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscopy in gastrointestinal surgery at our hospital from June 2020 to January 2021 were analyzed. All patients underwent simultaneous [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/MRI. The standard uptake value (SUV), fat removal standard uptake value (SUL), and diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for primary and metastatic lesions were compared, and their diagnostic value for different lymph node dissection stages was analyzed.

Results: The median age of the patients in this cohort was 68 years. Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery, and 11 patients underwent gastroscopic biopsy. The SUVmax of primary lesions in the FDG group and the FAPI group was 5.74 ± 5.09 and 8.06 ± 4.88, respectively (P < 0.01); SULmax values were 3.52 ± 2.80 and 5.64 ± 3.25, respectively (P < 0.01). The SUVmax of metastases in the two groups was 3.81 ± 3.08 and 5.17 ± 2.80, respectively (P < 0.05). The diagnostic sensitivities for primary lesions in the FDG group and the FAPI group were 0.72 and 0.94, respectively (P < 0.05). Combined with postoperative pathological staging, there was no difference in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of lymph node staging between the FDG and FAPI groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with the traditional imaging agent, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 has better diagnostic efficiency but no substantial advantage for preoperative lymph node staging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04与[18F]FDG PET/MRI在胃癌术前诊断中的比较
目的:比较新型显像剂[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04与传统显像剂[18F]FDG在胃癌术前诊断中的价值。方法:对2020年6月至2021年1月我院胃肠外科经胃镜诊断的40例胃癌患者进行分析。所有患者同时进行[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04和[18F]FDG PET/MRI检查。比较标准摄取值(SUV)、脂肪去除标准摄取值(SUL)以及对原发和转移性病变的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性,并分析其对不同淋巴结清扫分期的诊断价值。结果:该队列患者的中位年龄为68岁。29例患者接受手术,11例患者接受胃镜活检。FDG组和FAPI组原发性病变SUVmax分别为5.74±5.09和8.06±4.88 (P < 0.01);SULmax分别为3.52±2.80和5.64±3.25 (P < 0.01)。两组转移灶的SUVmax分别为3.81±3.08和5.17±2.80 (P < 0.05)。FDG组和FAPI组对原发性病变的诊断敏感性分别为0.72和0.94 (P < 0.05)。结合术后病理分期,FDG组与FAPI组对淋巴结分期的诊断敏感性和特异性比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:与传统显像剂相比,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04具有更好的诊断效能,但对术前淋巴结分期无明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信