Endoscopic Management of Benign Airway Stenosis in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2075-8109
Alfonso Fiorelli, Alfonso Pecoraro, Giuseppe Failla, Francesco De Blasio, Erino Angelo Rendina, Federico Venuta, Claudio Andreetti
{"title":"Endoscopic Management of Benign Airway Stenosis in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.","authors":"Alfonso Fiorelli, Alfonso Pecoraro, Giuseppe Failla, Francesco De Blasio, Erino Angelo Rendina, Federico Venuta, Claudio Andreetti","doi":"10.1055/a-2075-8109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of endoscopic dilation for simple benign airway stenosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and whether COVID-19 infection was associated with higher rate of recurrence compared with a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> It was an observational multicenter study including consecutive patients with simple benign airway stenosis undergoing endoscopic dilatation with at least 6 months of follow-up. The outcome of patients with COVID-19 infection was compared with that of a control group in relation to patient and stenosis characteristics, and procedure type. Then, univariable and multivariable analyses identified the risk factors for recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seventy-nine patients were included in the study; 56 (71%) of these developed airway stenosis after COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 patients presented a higher rate of stenosis due to prolonged intubation (82 vs. 43%; <i>p</i> = 0.0014); no other differences were found regarding demographic data, characteristics of stenosis, and procedure type. Twenty-four (30%) patients had recurrence after first dilatation (32% for No-COVID-19 vs. 26% for COVID-19 group; <i>p</i> = 0.70), and in 11 (35%) of these, the stenosis recurred after repeated endoscopic treatment (65% for No-COVID-19 vs. 45% for COVID-19 group; <i>p</i> = 0.40). Subglottic stenosis (<i>p</i> = 0.013) and the use of laser (<i>p</i> = 0.016) were significant predictive factors for stenosis recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> COVID-19 infection did not affect the outcome of endoscopic treatment of simple airway stenosis, and the treatment of these subsets of patients should not differ from that of general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"320-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2075-8109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of endoscopic dilation for simple benign airway stenosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and whether COVID-19 infection was associated with higher rate of recurrence compared with a control group.

Methods:  It was an observational multicenter study including consecutive patients with simple benign airway stenosis undergoing endoscopic dilatation with at least 6 months of follow-up. The outcome of patients with COVID-19 infection was compared with that of a control group in relation to patient and stenosis characteristics, and procedure type. Then, univariable and multivariable analyses identified the risk factors for recurrence.

Results:  Seventy-nine patients were included in the study; 56 (71%) of these developed airway stenosis after COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 patients presented a higher rate of stenosis due to prolonged intubation (82 vs. 43%; p = 0.0014); no other differences were found regarding demographic data, characteristics of stenosis, and procedure type. Twenty-four (30%) patients had recurrence after first dilatation (32% for No-COVID-19 vs. 26% for COVID-19 group; p = 0.70), and in 11 (35%) of these, the stenosis recurred after repeated endoscopic treatment (65% for No-COVID-19 vs. 45% for COVID-19 group; p = 0.40). Subglottic stenosis (p = 0.013) and the use of laser (p = 0.016) were significant predictive factors for stenosis recurrence.

Conclusion:  COVID-19 infection did not affect the outcome of endoscopic treatment of simple airway stenosis, and the treatment of these subsets of patients should not differ from that of general population.

2019 年冠状病毒病患者良性气道狭窄的内窥镜治疗。
背景:本研究的目的是评估冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)患者单纯良性气道狭窄的内窥镜扩张术效果,以及与对照组相比,COVID-19感染是否与较高的复发率有关:这是一项观察性多中心研究,包括接受内镜扩张术且随访至少6个月的单纯良性气道狭窄连续患者。将感染COVID-19的患者与对照组的结果进行比较,并结合患者和狭窄特点以及手术类型进行分析。然后,通过单变量和多变量分析确定了复发的风险因素:研究共纳入 79 名患者,其中 56 人(71%)在感染 COVID-19 后出现气道狭窄。COVID-19患者因插管时间过长导致气道狭窄的比例更高(82 vs. 43%; p = 0.0014);在人口统计学数据、狭窄特征和手术类型方面未发现其他差异。24例(30%)患者在首次扩张后复发(No-COVID-19组为32%,COVID-19组为26%;P = 0.70),其中11例(35%)患者在重复内镜治疗后狭窄复发(No-COVID-19组为65%,COVID-19组为45%;P = 0.40)。声门下狭窄(p = 0.013)和使用激光(p = 0.016)是狭窄复发的重要预测因素:结论:COVID-19 感染不会影响单纯性气道狭窄的内镜治疗效果,这些亚组患者的治疗方法与普通人群没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信