Central IRF4/5 Signaling Are Critical for Microglial Activation and Impact on Stroke Outcomes.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Translational Stroke Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s12975-023-01172-2
Conelius Ngwa, Abdullah Al Mamun, Shaohua Qi, Romana Sharmeen, Maria P Blasco Conesa, Bhanu P Ganesh, Bharti Manwani, Fudong Liu
{"title":"Central IRF4/5 Signaling Are Critical for Microglial Activation and Impact on Stroke Outcomes.","authors":"Conelius Ngwa, Abdullah Al Mamun, Shaohua Qi, Romana Sharmeen, Maria P Blasco Conesa, Bhanu P Ganesh, Bharti Manwani, Fudong Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12975-023-01172-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microglia and monocytes play a critical role in immune responses to cerebral ischemia. Previous studies have demonstrated that interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) and IRF5 direct microglial polarization after stroke and impact outcomes. However, IRF4/5 are expressed by both microglia and monocytes, and it is not clear if it is the microglial (central) or monocytic (peripheral) IRF4-IRF5 regulatory axis that functions in stroke. In this work, young (8-12 weeks) male pep boy (PB), IRF4 or IRF5 flox, and IRF4 or IRF5 conditional knockout (CKO) mice were used to generate 8 types of bone marrow chimeras, to differentiate the role of central (PB-to-IRF CKO) vs. peripheral (IRF CKO-to-PB) phagocytic IRF4-IRF5 axis in stroke. Chimeras generated from PB and flox mice were used as controls. All chimeras were subjected to 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model. Three days after the stroke, outcomes and inflammatory responses were analyzed. We found that PB-to-IRF4 CKO chimeras had more robust microglial pro-inflammatory responses than IRF4 CKO-to-PB chimeras, while ameliorated microglial response was seen in PB-to-IRF5 CKO vs. IRF5 CKO-to-PB chimeras. PB-to-IRF4 or IRF5 CKO chimeras had worse or better stroke outcomes respectively than their controls, whereas IRF4 or 5 CKO-to-PB chimeras had similar outcomes compared to controls. We conclude that the central IRF4/5 signaling is responsible for microglial activation and mediates stroke outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-023-01172-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microglia and monocytes play a critical role in immune responses to cerebral ischemia. Previous studies have demonstrated that interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) and IRF5 direct microglial polarization after stroke and impact outcomes. However, IRF4/5 are expressed by both microglia and monocytes, and it is not clear if it is the microglial (central) or monocytic (peripheral) IRF4-IRF5 regulatory axis that functions in stroke. In this work, young (8-12 weeks) male pep boy (PB), IRF4 or IRF5 flox, and IRF4 or IRF5 conditional knockout (CKO) mice were used to generate 8 types of bone marrow chimeras, to differentiate the role of central (PB-to-IRF CKO) vs. peripheral (IRF CKO-to-PB) phagocytic IRF4-IRF5 axis in stroke. Chimeras generated from PB and flox mice were used as controls. All chimeras were subjected to 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model. Three days after the stroke, outcomes and inflammatory responses were analyzed. We found that PB-to-IRF4 CKO chimeras had more robust microglial pro-inflammatory responses than IRF4 CKO-to-PB chimeras, while ameliorated microglial response was seen in PB-to-IRF5 CKO vs. IRF5 CKO-to-PB chimeras. PB-to-IRF4 or IRF5 CKO chimeras had worse or better stroke outcomes respectively than their controls, whereas IRF4 or 5 CKO-to-PB chimeras had similar outcomes compared to controls. We conclude that the central IRF4/5 signaling is responsible for microglial activation and mediates stroke outcomes.

Abstract Image

中枢 IRF4/5 信号是小胶质细胞活化和影响中风预后的关键。
小胶质细胞和单核细胞在脑缺血的免疫反应中起着至关重要的作用。先前的研究表明,干扰素调节因子 4(IRF4)和 IRF5 引导中风后小胶质细胞极化并影响预后。然而,IRF4/5 在小胶质细胞和单核细胞中均有表达,目前尚不清楚在中风中起作用的是小胶质细胞(中枢)还是单核细胞(外周)的 IRF4-IRF5 调节轴。本研究利用年轻(8-12 周)雄性 Pep boy(PB)、IRF4 或 IRF5 基因缺失(flox)和 IRF4 或 IRF5 条件性敲除(CKO)小鼠生成 8 种类型的骨髓嵌合体,以区分中枢(PB-to-IRF CKO)与外周(IRF CKO-to-PB)吞噬 IRF4-IRF5 轴在中风中的作用。由 PB 和荧光小鼠产生的嵌合体用作对照。所有嵌合体均接受60分钟大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)模型。中风三天后,对结果和炎症反应进行了分析。我们发现,PB-to-IRF4 CKO嵌合体的小胶质细胞促炎反应比IRF4 CKO-to-PB嵌合体更强,而PB-to-IRF5 CKO与IRF5 CKO-to-PB嵌合体的小胶质细胞反应则有所改善。与对照组相比,PB-to-IRF4 或 IRF5 CKO 嵌合体的中风预后分别较差或较好,而 IRF4 或 5 CKO-to-PB 嵌合体的中风预后与对照组相似。我们的结论是,中枢 IRF4/5 信号传导是小胶质细胞活化的原因,并介导中风预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信