Emma I. Brett , Abigayle R. Feather , Zoe Lee , Daniel J. Fridberg , Yasmin Asvat , Andrea C. King
{"title":"Courage to Quit® rolling group: Implementation in an urban medical center in primarily low-income Black smokers","authors":"Emma I. Brett , Abigayle R. Feather , Zoe Lee , Daniel J. Fridberg , Yasmin Asvat , Andrea C. King","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Continuous “rolling” tobacco group treatments may help reduce cessation disparities<span> by increasing access among underserved people who smoke cigarettes. We evaluated the implementation of a rolling enrollment adaptation of an evidence-based tobacco treatment group intervention, Courage to Quit®-Rolling (CTQ®-R).</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The 4-session CTQ®-R incorporating psychoeducation, motivational enhancement, and cognitive behavioral skills was evaluated by examining feasibility and preliminary program outcomes with a pre-post design using the SQUIRE method in a sample of 289 primarily low-income, Black people who smoke. Feasibility was measured by examining program retention. Paired </span><em>t</em><span>-tests evaluated changes in behavioral intentions and knowledge about smoking cessation and differences in average daily cigarettes smoked from first to last session attended.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTQ-R was feasible to implement in an urban medical center program enrolling primarily low-income Black people who smoke, with 52% attending at least 2 sessions and 24% completing the full program. Participants demonstrated improvements in knowledge of smoking cessation strategies and confidence in quitting (<em>p</em>s < .004). Preliminary effectiveness analyses showed a 30% reduction in average daily cigarette use, with group completers reporting greater reduction than non-completers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CTQ®-R is feasible and showed preliminary effectiveness for increasing knowledge about stop smoking skills and reducing cigarette smoking.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>A rolling enrollment smoking group treatment is feasible and may be effective among people who smoke who face historical and systemic barriers to tobacco treatment engagement. Evaluation in other settings and over longer periods of time is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076423000015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Continuous “rolling” tobacco group treatments may help reduce cessation disparities by increasing access among underserved people who smoke cigarettes. We evaluated the implementation of a rolling enrollment adaptation of an evidence-based tobacco treatment group intervention, Courage to Quit®-Rolling (CTQ®-R).
Methods
The 4-session CTQ®-R incorporating psychoeducation, motivational enhancement, and cognitive behavioral skills was evaluated by examining feasibility and preliminary program outcomes with a pre-post design using the SQUIRE method in a sample of 289 primarily low-income, Black people who smoke. Feasibility was measured by examining program retention. Paired t-tests evaluated changes in behavioral intentions and knowledge about smoking cessation and differences in average daily cigarettes smoked from first to last session attended.
Results
CTQ-R was feasible to implement in an urban medical center program enrolling primarily low-income Black people who smoke, with 52% attending at least 2 sessions and 24% completing the full program. Participants demonstrated improvements in knowledge of smoking cessation strategies and confidence in quitting (ps < .004). Preliminary effectiveness analyses showed a 30% reduction in average daily cigarette use, with group completers reporting greater reduction than non-completers.
Conclusions
CTQ®-R is feasible and showed preliminary effectiveness for increasing knowledge about stop smoking skills and reducing cigarette smoking.
Implications
A rolling enrollment smoking group treatment is feasible and may be effective among people who smoke who face historical and systemic barriers to tobacco treatment engagement. Evaluation in other settings and over longer periods of time is needed.
背景持续的“滚动”烟草团体治疗可能有助于通过增加服务不足的吸烟人群的戒烟机会来减少戒烟差距。我们评估了循证烟草治疗组干预措施Courage to Quit®-rolling(CTQ®-R)的滚动入学适应性的实施情况,认知行为技能的评估是通过使用SQUIRE方法在289名主要是低收入黑人吸烟者的样本中进行岗前设计,检查可行性和初步项目结果。可行性是通过检查项目保留率来衡量的。配对t检验评估了从参加第一次到最后一次会议的行为意图和戒烟知识的变化,以及平均每天吸烟量的差异。结果CTQ-R在城市医疗中心项目中实施是可行的,该项目主要招收低收入的吸烟黑人,52%的人至少参加了2次会议,24%的人完成了整个项目。参与者在戒烟策略知识和戒烟信心方面有所提高(ps<;.004)。初步有效性分析显示,平均每天吸烟量减少了30%,结论sTQ®-R是可行的,在提高戒烟技能和减少吸烟方面显示出初步的有效性。含义滚动登记吸烟团体治疗是可行的,并且可能对那些在参与烟草治疗方面面临历史和系统障碍的吸烟者有效。需要在其他环境中进行更长时间的评估。
期刊介绍:
HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology.
The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as:
● Care redesign
● Applied health IT
● Payment innovation
● Managerial innovation
● Quality improvement (QI) research
● New training and education models
● Comparative delivery innovation