Effect of Supplemental Regional Anesthesia on the Complication and Readmission Rate of Patients After Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery.

IF 2.1
Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-08 DOI:10.1177/19386400231181280
Yianni Bakaes, Tyler Gonzalez, J Benjamin Jackson
{"title":"Effect of Supplemental Regional Anesthesia on the Complication and Readmission Rate of Patients After Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery.","authors":"Yianni Bakaes, Tyler Gonzalez, J Benjamin Jackson","doi":"10.1177/19386400231181280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to define the effect of facility type (inpatient vs outpatient) for the use of supplemental regional anesthesia (SRA), and SRA's effect on complications, readmissions, operation time, and length of hospital stay after elective foot and ankle surgery.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients who underwent elective foot and ankle surgery between 2006 and 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We fit log-binomial generalized linear models to estimate risk ratios for general anesthesia (GA) with SRA versus GA alone, and linear regression models to estimate the effect of GA with SRA on the average total hospital length of stay (in days) and operation time (in minutes); we also performed inverse propensity scores.ResultsWe found that there is no statistical difference in the rate of readmissions (P = .081) between patients under GA alone versus GA with SRA. In the propensity score analysis, patients who underwent midfoot/forefoot surgery had 3.85 times the risk of complications under GA with SRA compared with GA alone (P = .045). Also, patients who received GA with SRA had a longer unadjusted operative duration (102.22 minutes) when compared with patients who received GA alone (93.84 minutes) (P < .001). However, patients who received GA alone had a longer unadjusted hospital length of stay (0.88 days) when compared with patients who received GA with SRA (0.70 days) (P = .006).ConclusionThis study found that, when compared with GA alone, GA with SRA leads to a statistically significant increased operative time but a shorter hospital stay without significantly increasing readmissions and only increasing the risk of complications for midfoot/forefoot surgery within 30 days postoperatively for elective foot and ankle surgery.Level of Evidence:<i>Level III</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"493-500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231181280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to define the effect of facility type (inpatient vs outpatient) for the use of supplemental regional anesthesia (SRA), and SRA's effect on complications, readmissions, operation time, and length of hospital stay after elective foot and ankle surgery.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients who underwent elective foot and ankle surgery between 2006 and 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We fit log-binomial generalized linear models to estimate risk ratios for general anesthesia (GA) with SRA versus GA alone, and linear regression models to estimate the effect of GA with SRA on the average total hospital length of stay (in days) and operation time (in minutes); we also performed inverse propensity scores.ResultsWe found that there is no statistical difference in the rate of readmissions (P = .081) between patients under GA alone versus GA with SRA. In the propensity score analysis, patients who underwent midfoot/forefoot surgery had 3.85 times the risk of complications under GA with SRA compared with GA alone (P = .045). Also, patients who received GA with SRA had a longer unadjusted operative duration (102.22 minutes) when compared with patients who received GA alone (93.84 minutes) (P < .001). However, patients who received GA alone had a longer unadjusted hospital length of stay (0.88 days) when compared with patients who received GA with SRA (0.70 days) (P = .006).ConclusionThis study found that, when compared with GA alone, GA with SRA leads to a statistically significant increased operative time but a shorter hospital stay without significantly increasing readmissions and only increasing the risk of complications for midfoot/forefoot surgery within 30 days postoperatively for elective foot and ankle surgery.Level of Evidence:Level III.

补充区域麻醉对择期足踝手术患者并发症及再入院率的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是确定医院类型(住院与门诊)对使用补充区域麻醉(SRA)的影响,以及SRA对选择性足踝手术后并发症、再入院、手术时间和住院时间的影响。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中确定了2006年至2020年期间接受选择性足部和踝关节手术的大型成年患者队列。我们拟合对数二项广义线性模型来估计全身麻醉(GA)加SRA与单独全身麻醉的风险比,并拟合线性回归模型来估计全身麻醉加SRA对平均总住院时间(天)和手术时间(分钟)的影响;我们还进行了反向倾向评分。结果单纯GA组与GA组合并SRA组再入院率无统计学差异(P = 0.081)。在倾向评分分析中,接受足中/前足手术的患者在GA联合SRA下发生并发症的风险是单纯GA的3.85倍(P = 0.045)。此外,与单独接受GA的患者(93.84分钟)相比,接受GA合并SRA的患者的未调整手术时间(102.22分钟)更长(P < 0.001)。然而,单独接受GA治疗的患者的未调整住院时间(0.88天)比同时接受GA治疗的患者(0.70天)更长(P = 0.006)。本研究发现,与单纯GA相比,GA联合SRA可显著增加手术时间,缩短住院时间,且未显著增加再入院率,仅增加择期足部和踝关节手术后30天内中/前足手术并发症的风险。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信