CYP1A2 Genotype Polymorphism Influences the Effect of Caffeine on Anaerobic Performance in Trained Males.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Shahin Minaei, Morteza Jourkesh, Richard B Kreider, Scott C Forbes, Tacito P Souza-Junior, Steven R McAnulty, Douglas Kalman
{"title":"CYP1A2 Genotype Polymorphism Influences the Effect of Caffeine on Anaerobic Performance in Trained Males.","authors":"Shahin Minaei,&nbsp;Morteza Jourkesh,&nbsp;Richard B Kreider,&nbsp;Scott C Forbes,&nbsp;Tacito P Souza-Junior,&nbsp;Steven R McAnulty,&nbsp;Douglas Kalman","doi":"10.1123/ijsnem.2021-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose was to investigate the effects of CYP1A2 -163C > A polymorphism on the effects of acute caffeine (CAF) supplementation on anaerobic power in trained males. Sixteen trained males (age: 21.6 ± 7.1 years; height: 179.7 ± 5.6 cm; body mass: 72.15 ± 6.8 kg) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLA) controlled crossover design. Participants supplemented with CAF (6 mg/kg of body mass) and an isovolumetric PLA (maltodextrin) in random order and separated by 7 days, before an all-out 30-s anaerobic cycling test to determine peak, average, and minimum power output, and fatigue index. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted to identify each participants CYP1A2 genotype. Six participants expressed AA homozygote and 10 expressed C alleles. There was a treatment by genotype interaction for peak power output (p = .041, η2 = .265, observed power = 0.552) with only those expressing AA genotype showing improvement following CAF supplementation compared with PLA (CAF: 693 ± 108 watts vs. PLA: 655 ± 97 watts; p = .039), while no difference between treatments was noted in those expressing C alleles (CAF: 614 ± 92 watts vs. PLA: 659 ± 144 watts; p = .135). There were no other interaction or main effects for average or minimum power output, or fatigue index (p > .05). In conclusion, the ingestion of 6 mg/kg of CAF improved peak power output only in participants with the AA genotype compared with PLA; however, expression of the CYP1A2 did not influence average or minimum power output or fatigue index.</p>","PeriodicalId":14334,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","volume":"32 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2021-0090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose was to investigate the effects of CYP1A2 -163C > A polymorphism on the effects of acute caffeine (CAF) supplementation on anaerobic power in trained males. Sixteen trained males (age: 21.6 ± 7.1 years; height: 179.7 ± 5.6 cm; body mass: 72.15 ± 6.8 kg) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLA) controlled crossover design. Participants supplemented with CAF (6 mg/kg of body mass) and an isovolumetric PLA (maltodextrin) in random order and separated by 7 days, before an all-out 30-s anaerobic cycling test to determine peak, average, and minimum power output, and fatigue index. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted to identify each participants CYP1A2 genotype. Six participants expressed AA homozygote and 10 expressed C alleles. There was a treatment by genotype interaction for peak power output (p = .041, η2 = .265, observed power = 0.552) with only those expressing AA genotype showing improvement following CAF supplementation compared with PLA (CAF: 693 ± 108 watts vs. PLA: 655 ± 97 watts; p = .039), while no difference between treatments was noted in those expressing C alleles (CAF: 614 ± 92 watts vs. PLA: 659 ± 144 watts; p = .135). There were no other interaction or main effects for average or minimum power output, or fatigue index (p > .05). In conclusion, the ingestion of 6 mg/kg of CAF improved peak power output only in participants with the AA genotype compared with PLA; however, expression of the CYP1A2 did not influence average or minimum power output or fatigue index.

CYP1A2基因型多态性影响咖啡因对训练雄性无氧性能的影响。
目的是研究CYP1A2 -163C > A多态性对急性咖啡因(CAF)补充对训练雄性无氧能力的影响。男性16名(年龄:21.6±7.1岁;高度:179.7±5.6 cm;体重:72.15±6.8 kg)参加随机、双盲、安慰剂(PLA)对照交叉设计。参与者按随机顺序补充CAF (6 mg/kg体重)和等体积PLA(麦芽糊精),间隔7天,然后进行30秒的全面厌氧循环测试,以确定峰值、平均和最小功率输出以及疲劳指数。提取基因组脱氧核糖核酸来鉴定每个参与者的CYP1A2基因型。6名参与者表达AA纯合子,10名参与者表达C等位基因。在峰值输出功率方面存在基因型交互作用(p = 0.041, η2 = 0.265,观察功率= 0.552),与PLA相比,只有表达AA基因型的患者在补充CAF后表现出改善(CAF: 693±108瓦vs PLA: 655±97瓦;p = 0.039),而表达C等位基因的处理之间没有差异(CAF: 614±92瓦vs PLA: 659±144瓦;P = .135)。平均或最小功率输出或疲劳指数无其他交互作用或主效应(p > 0.05)。综上所述,与PLA相比,摄入6 mg/kg CAF仅能改善AA基因型参与者的峰值功率输出;然而,CYP1A2的表达不影响平均或最小功率输出或疲劳指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (IJSNEM) publishes original scientific investigations and scholarly reviews offering new insights into sport nutrition and exercise metabolism, as well as articles focusing on the application of the principles of biochemistry, physiology, and nutrition to sport and exercise. The journal also offers editorials, digests of related articles from other fields, research notes, and reviews of books, videos, and other media releases. To subscribe to either the print or e-version of IJSNEM, press the Subscribe or Renew button at the top of your screen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信