Cartilage evaluation by ultrasonography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping review.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Takehisa Ogura, Takaharu Katagiri, Hideto Kameda
{"title":"Cartilage evaluation by ultrasonography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping review.","authors":"Takehisa Ogura,&nbsp;Takaharu Katagiri,&nbsp;Hideto Kameda","doi":"10.1186/s41232-023-00286-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of ultrasonographic cartilage evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identify research gaps in the utilization of cartilage evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for articles published up to July 2022 using the search term variations of \"cartilage,\" \"ultrasonography,\" and \"rheumatoid arthritis.\" Studies that included patients with RA who underwent cartilage evaluation by ultrasonography were selected. Articles published in languages other than English and about juvenile idiopathic arthritis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were identified. Most were cross-sectional studies (86%), mainly involving the metacarpophalangeal (55%) and knee (34%) joints. Assessments were performed using quantitative, binary, and semi-quantitative methods in 15, 10, and 15 studies, respectively. Reliability assessments were conducted in 10 studies, which showed feasible reliability but were limited to the finger joints. The validity assessment was validated in one study each that compared cartilage thickness measurements with cadaveric specimens and histological and semi-quantitative methods with surgical specimens, respectively. Comparisons with conventional radiography were also performed in six studies, which showed significant correlations. However, there was heterogeneity in the examination and assessment methods, and no adequate longitudinal evaluation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for further research and validation of ultrasonographic cartilage assessment in patients with RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13588,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation and Regeneration","volume":"43 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-023-00286-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to provide an overview of ultrasonographic cartilage evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identify research gaps in the utilization of cartilage evaluation.

Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for articles published up to July 2022 using the search term variations of "cartilage," "ultrasonography," and "rheumatoid arthritis." Studies that included patients with RA who underwent cartilage evaluation by ultrasonography were selected. Articles published in languages other than English and about juvenile idiopathic arthritis were excluded.

Results: Twenty-nine articles were identified. Most were cross-sectional studies (86%), mainly involving the metacarpophalangeal (55%) and knee (34%) joints. Assessments were performed using quantitative, binary, and semi-quantitative methods in 15, 10, and 15 studies, respectively. Reliability assessments were conducted in 10 studies, which showed feasible reliability but were limited to the finger joints. The validity assessment was validated in one study each that compared cartilage thickness measurements with cadaveric specimens and histological and semi-quantitative methods with surgical specimens, respectively. Comparisons with conventional radiography were also performed in six studies, which showed significant correlations. However, there was heterogeneity in the examination and assessment methods, and no adequate longitudinal evaluation was conducted.

Conclusion: This review highlights the need for further research and validation of ultrasonographic cartilage assessment in patients with RA.

Abstract Image

类风湿性关节炎患者的软骨超声评估:范围审查。
背景:本研究旨在综述超声软骨评估在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的应用,并找出软骨评估应用方面的研究空白。方法:本研究按照系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展指南进行。对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统的文献检索,检索截止到2022年7月发表的文章,检索词包括“软骨”、“超声”和“类风湿关节炎”。研究对象包括接受超声软骨评估的RA患者。用英语以外的语言发表的关于青少年特发性关节炎的文章被排除在外。结果:共鉴定29篇。大多数是横断面研究(86%),主要涉及掌指关节(55%)和膝关节(34%)。分别在15项、10项和15项研究中采用定量、二元和半定量方法进行评估。在10项研究中进行了可靠性评估,显示出可行的可靠性,但仅限于手指关节。有效性评估在一项研究中得到验证,该研究分别将软骨厚度测量与尸体标本和组织学和半定量方法与手术标本进行比较。在六项研究中,与常规x线摄影进行了比较,显示出显著的相关性。但考核评价方法存在异质性,且未进行充分的纵向评价。结论:本综述强调超声软骨评估在RA患者中的应用需要进一步的研究和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Inflammation and Regeneration is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Inflammation and Regeneration (JSIR). This journal provides an open access forum which covers a wide range of scientific topics in the basic and clinical researches on inflammation and regenerative medicine. It also covers investigations of infectious diseases, including COVID-19 and other emerging infectious diseases, which involve the inflammatory responses. Inflammation and Regeneration publishes papers in the following categories: research article, note, rapid communication, case report, review and clinical drug evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信