Dental Extractions under General Anesthesia: New Insights from Process Mining.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
F Fox, H Whelton, O A Johnson, V R Aggarwal
{"title":"Dental Extractions under General Anesthesia: New Insights from Process Mining.","authors":"F Fox,&nbsp;H Whelton,&nbsp;O A Johnson,&nbsp;V R Aggarwal","doi":"10.1177/23800844221088833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tooth extraction under general anesthetic (GA) is a global health problem. It is expensive, high risk, and resource intensive, and its prevalence and burden should be reduced where possible. Recent innovation in data analysis techniques now makes it possible to assess the impact of GA policy decisions on public health outcomes. This article describes results from one such technique called process mining, which was applied to dental electronic health record (EHR) data. Treatment pathways preceding extractions under general anesthetic were mined to yield useful insights into waiting times, number of dental visits, treatments, and prescribing behaviors associated with this undesirable outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Anonymized data were extracted from a dental EHR covering a population of 231,760 patients aged 0 to 16 y, treated in the Irish public health care system between 2000 and 2014. The data were profiled, assessed for quality, and preprocessed in preparation for analysis. Existing process mining methods were adapted to execute process mining in the context of assessing dental EHR data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Process models of dental treatment preceding extractions under general anesthetic were generated from the EHR data using process mining tools. A total of 5,563 patients who had 26,115 GA were identified. Of these, 9% received a tooth dressing before extraction with an average lag time of 6 mo between dressing and extraction. In total, 11,867 emergency appointments were attended by the cohort with 2,668 X-rays, 4,370 prescriptions, and over 800 restorations and other treatments carried out prior to tooth extraction.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Process models generated useful insights, identifying metrics and issues around extractions under general anesthetic and revealing the complexity of dental treatment pathways. The pathways showed high levels of emergency appointments, prescriptions, and additional tooth restorations ultimately unsuccessful in preventing extractions. Supporting earlier publications, the study suggested earlier screening, preventive initiatives, guideline development, and alternative treatments deserve consideration.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>This study generates insights into tooth extractions under general anesthetic using process mining technologies and methods, revealing levels of extraction and associated high levels of prescriptions, emergency appointments, and restorative treatments. These insights can inform dental planners assessing policy decisions for tooth extractions under general anesthetic. The methods used can be combined with costs and patient outcomes to contribute to more effective decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":"8 3","pages":"267-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285189/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221088833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth extraction under general anesthetic (GA) is a global health problem. It is expensive, high risk, and resource intensive, and its prevalence and burden should be reduced where possible. Recent innovation in data analysis techniques now makes it possible to assess the impact of GA policy decisions on public health outcomes. This article describes results from one such technique called process mining, which was applied to dental electronic health record (EHR) data. Treatment pathways preceding extractions under general anesthetic were mined to yield useful insights into waiting times, number of dental visits, treatments, and prescribing behaviors associated with this undesirable outcome.

Method: Anonymized data were extracted from a dental EHR covering a population of 231,760 patients aged 0 to 16 y, treated in the Irish public health care system between 2000 and 2014. The data were profiled, assessed for quality, and preprocessed in preparation for analysis. Existing process mining methods were adapted to execute process mining in the context of assessing dental EHR data.

Results: Process models of dental treatment preceding extractions under general anesthetic were generated from the EHR data using process mining tools. A total of 5,563 patients who had 26,115 GA were identified. Of these, 9% received a tooth dressing before extraction with an average lag time of 6 mo between dressing and extraction. In total, 11,867 emergency appointments were attended by the cohort with 2,668 X-rays, 4,370 prescriptions, and over 800 restorations and other treatments carried out prior to tooth extraction.

Discussion and conclusions: Process models generated useful insights, identifying metrics and issues around extractions under general anesthetic and revealing the complexity of dental treatment pathways. The pathways showed high levels of emergency appointments, prescriptions, and additional tooth restorations ultimately unsuccessful in preventing extractions. Supporting earlier publications, the study suggested earlier screening, preventive initiatives, guideline development, and alternative treatments deserve consideration.

Knowledge transfer statement: This study generates insights into tooth extractions under general anesthetic using process mining technologies and methods, revealing levels of extraction and associated high levels of prescriptions, emergency appointments, and restorative treatments. These insights can inform dental planners assessing policy decisions for tooth extractions under general anesthetic. The methods used can be combined with costs and patient outcomes to contribute to more effective decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全麻下拔牙:过程挖掘的新见解。
全麻拔牙是一个全球性的健康问题。它昂贵、风险高、资源密集,应尽可能减少其流行程度和负担。最近在数据分析技术方面的创新使评估遗传决策对公共卫生结果的影响成为可能。本文描述了一种称为流程挖掘的技术的结果,该技术应用于牙科电子健康记录(EHR)数据。在全麻下拔牙前的治疗途径被挖掘出来,以产生有用的见解,如等待时间、牙科就诊次数、治疗方法和与这种不良结果相关的处方行为。方法:从2000年至2014年期间在爱尔兰公共卫生保健系统接受治疗的231,760名0至16岁患者的牙科电子病历中提取匿名数据。对数据进行分析、质量评估和预处理,为分析做准备。现有的流程挖掘方法适用于在评估牙科电子病历数据的背景下执行流程挖掘。结果:利用过程挖掘工具从EHR数据中生成全麻拔牙前牙科治疗的过程模型。共有5563名患者确诊为26115例GA。其中,9%的患者在拔牙前接受了牙齿包扎,包扎和拔牙之间的平均滞后时间为6个月。该队列共进行了11,867次紧急预约,进行了2,668次x光检查,开具了4,370张处方,并在拔牙前进行了800多次修复和其他治疗。讨论和结论:过程模型产生了有用的见解,确定了全麻下拔牙的指标和问题,揭示了牙科治疗途径的复杂性。路径显示高水平的紧急预约、处方和额外的牙齿修复最终未能阻止拔牙。支持早期的出版物,该研究建议早期筛查,预防措施,指南制定和替代治疗值得考虑。知识转移声明:本研究利用过程挖掘技术和方法对全身麻醉下的拔牙产生了见解,揭示了拔牙水平和相关的高水平处方、紧急预约和恢复性治疗。这些见解可以为牙科计划人员评估在全身麻醉下拔牙的政策决定提供信息。所使用的方法可以与成本和患者结果相结合,以促进更有效的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信