Preoperative Workup of Patients With Excessive Central Airway Collapse: Does Stent Evaluation Serve a Role?

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jennifer M Pan, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Sumedh Kaul, Mihir S Parikh, Jennifer L Wilson, Adnan Majid, Sidhu P Gangadharan
{"title":"Preoperative Workup of Patients With Excessive Central Airway Collapse: Does Stent Evaluation Serve a Role?","authors":"Jennifer M Pan, Daniel Ospina-Delgado, Sumedh Kaul, Mihir S Parikh, Jennifer L Wilson, Adnan Majid, Sidhu P Gangadharan","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheobronchoplasty (TBP) is a definitive anatomic intervention for patients with severe symptomatic expiratory central airway collapse. Although stent evaluations have been described for surgical workup, current literature does not address if improvement during stent evaluation is sustained after TBP. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional status responses after airway stenting to those post-TBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed in patients with severe expiratory central airway collapse who underwent stent evaluation followed by TBP from January 2004 to December 2019. Baseline, poststent, 3- and 12-month postoperative HRQOL scores, and functional status were analyzed with statistical tests as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty patients underwent a stent evaluation and TBP. Baseline and stent evaluation measurements were compared with statistically and clinically significant differences in the Cough Quality-of-life Questionnaire (CQLQ) (55 vs. 68, P <0.01), Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) 0 to 2 (90% vs. 47%, P <0.01), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (1301 ft vs. 1138 ft, P <0.01). Improvements in the HRQOL and functional status were maintained from stent evaluation to 3 months postoperatively [CQLQ 55 vs. 54, P =0.63; mMRC 0 to 2 (87% vs. 84%), P =0.39; 6MWT 1350 ft vs. 1314 ft, P =0.33], and 12 months postoperatively [CQLQ 54 vs. 54, P =0.91; mMRC 0 to 2 (95% vs. 86%), P =0.74; 6MWT 1409 ft vs. 1328 ft, P =0.13]. The magnitude of change between the data was not significantly different between the stent evaluation, 3-, and 12 months postoperative. Predicted forced expiratory volume in 1-second measurements at baseline, after stent placement, 3 months, and 12 months post-TBP were 74%, 79%, 73%, and 73%, respectively, and not clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvement after stent evaluation and the magnitude of improvement may be predictive of postoperative outcomes up to 1 year after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tracheobronchoplasty (TBP) is a definitive anatomic intervention for patients with severe symptomatic expiratory central airway collapse. Although stent evaluations have been described for surgical workup, current literature does not address if improvement during stent evaluation is sustained after TBP. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional status responses after airway stenting to those post-TBP.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed in patients with severe expiratory central airway collapse who underwent stent evaluation followed by TBP from January 2004 to December 2019. Baseline, poststent, 3- and 12-month postoperative HRQOL scores, and functional status were analyzed with statistical tests as appropriate.

Results: One hundred twenty patients underwent a stent evaluation and TBP. Baseline and stent evaluation measurements were compared with statistically and clinically significant differences in the Cough Quality-of-life Questionnaire (CQLQ) (55 vs. 68, P <0.01), Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) 0 to 2 (90% vs. 47%, P <0.01), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (1301 ft vs. 1138 ft, P <0.01). Improvements in the HRQOL and functional status were maintained from stent evaluation to 3 months postoperatively [CQLQ 55 vs. 54, P =0.63; mMRC 0 to 2 (87% vs. 84%), P =0.39; 6MWT 1350 ft vs. 1314 ft, P =0.33], and 12 months postoperatively [CQLQ 54 vs. 54, P =0.91; mMRC 0 to 2 (95% vs. 86%), P =0.74; 6MWT 1409 ft vs. 1328 ft, P =0.13]. The magnitude of change between the data was not significantly different between the stent evaluation, 3-, and 12 months postoperative. Predicted forced expiratory volume in 1-second measurements at baseline, after stent placement, 3 months, and 12 months post-TBP were 74%, 79%, 73%, and 73%, respectively, and not clinically significant.

Conclusions: Improvement after stent evaluation and the magnitude of improvement may be predictive of postoperative outcomes up to 1 year after surgery.

中央气道过度塌陷患者的术前检查:支架评估是否有作用?
背景:气管支气管成形术(TBP)是针对有严重症状的呼气性中央气道塌陷患者的一种明确的解剖干预措施。虽然有文献描述支架评估可用于手术治疗,但目前的文献并未论及支架评估期间的改善是否会在 TBP 术后持续。我们比较了气道支架术后与 TBP 术后的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和功能状态反应:我们对 2004 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受支架评估并随后接受 TBP 的严重呼气性中央气道塌陷患者进行了回顾性研究。对基线、支架术后、术后 3 个月和 12 个月的 HRQOL 评分以及功能状态进行分析,并酌情进行统计检验:120名患者接受了支架评估和TBP。对基线和支架评估结果进行比较,发现咳嗽生活质量问卷(CQLQ)在统计学和临床上有显著差异(55 对 68,P 结论:支架评估后的改善和术后 12 个月的 HRQOL 评分以及功能状态均有显著改善:支架评估后的改善情况和改善程度可能预示着术后一年内的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信