Mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation in traumatic spinal cord injuries: Early hyperperfusion treatment influences neurologic outcomes.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2223447
Aimee K LaRiccia, Kimberly Sperwer, Michael L Lieber, M Chance Spalding
{"title":"Mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation in traumatic spinal cord injuries: Early hyperperfusion treatment influences neurologic outcomes.","authors":"Aimee K LaRiccia, Kimberly Sperwer, Michael L Lieber, M Chance Spalding","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2223447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Context:</b> Hyperperfusion therapy, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) > 85 mmHg, is a recommended treatment of blunt traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized the first 24 h of MAP augmentation would be most influential on neurological outcomes.<b>Design:</b> This retrospective study from a level 1 urban trauma center dating 1/2017 to 12/2019 included all blunt traumatic spinal cord injured patients receiving hyperperfusion therapy. Patients were grouped as \"No improvement\" vs \"Improvement\" measured by change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score during their hospitalization. MAP values for the first 12, first 24 and last 72 h were compared between the two groups; P < 0.05 was significant.<b>Results:</b> After exclusions, 96 patients underwent hyperperfusion therapy for blunt traumatic SCI, 82 in the No Improvement and 14 in the Improvement group. Groups had similar treatment durations (95.6 and 96.7 h, P = 0.66) and ISS (20.5 and 23, P = 0.45). The area under the curve, calculation, to account for time less than goal and MAP difference from goal, in the No Improvement group was significantly higher (lower and more time below MAP goal) compared to the Improvement group for the first 12 h (40.3 v. 26.1 P = 0.03) with similar findings in the subsequent 12 h of treatment (13-24 h; 62.2 vs 43, P = 0.09). There was no difference between the groups in the subsequent 72 h (25-96 h; 156.4 vs 136.6, P = 0.57).<b>Conclusions:</b> Hyperperfusion to the spinal cord in the first 12 h correlated significantly with improved neurological outcome in SCI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"918-925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2223447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Hyperperfusion therapy, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) > 85 mmHg, is a recommended treatment of blunt traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized the first 24 h of MAP augmentation would be most influential on neurological outcomes.Design: This retrospective study from a level 1 urban trauma center dating 1/2017 to 12/2019 included all blunt traumatic spinal cord injured patients receiving hyperperfusion therapy. Patients were grouped as "No improvement" vs "Improvement" measured by change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score during their hospitalization. MAP values for the first 12, first 24 and last 72 h were compared between the two groups; P < 0.05 was significant.Results: After exclusions, 96 patients underwent hyperperfusion therapy for blunt traumatic SCI, 82 in the No Improvement and 14 in the Improvement group. Groups had similar treatment durations (95.6 and 96.7 h, P = 0.66) and ISS (20.5 and 23, P = 0.45). The area under the curve, calculation, to account for time less than goal and MAP difference from goal, in the No Improvement group was significantly higher (lower and more time below MAP goal) compared to the Improvement group for the first 12 h (40.3 v. 26.1 P = 0.03) with similar findings in the subsequent 12 h of treatment (13-24 h; 62.2 vs 43, P = 0.09). There was no difference between the groups in the subsequent 72 h (25-96 h; 156.4 vs 136.6, P = 0.57).Conclusions: Hyperperfusion to the spinal cord in the first 12 h correlated significantly with improved neurological outcome in SCI patients.

创伤性脊髓损伤的平均动脉压(MAP)增强:早期高灌注治疗影响神经功能预后。
背景:高灌注疗法(平均动脉血压 (MAP) > 85 mmHg)是治疗钝性创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)的推荐疗法。我们假设,MAP 升高的头 24 小时对神经系统的预后影响最大:这项回顾性研究来自一个一级城市创伤中心,时间为 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 12 日,包括所有接受高灌注治疗的钝性创伤性脊髓损伤患者。根据住院期间美国脊柱损伤协会(ASIA)评分的变化,将患者分为 "无改善 "和 "有改善 "两组。比较两组患者在最初 12 小时、最初 24 小时和最后 72 小时的 MAP 值;P 结果:排除其他因素后,96 名钝性创伤性 SCI 患者接受了超灌注治疗,其中 82 人属于无改善组,14 人属于有改善组。两组的治疗时间(95.6 和 96.7 小时,P = 0.66)和 ISS(20.5 和 23,P = 0.45)相似。与改善组相比,未改善组在最初的 12 小时内(40.3 对 26.1,P = 0.03)的曲线下面积(计算低于目标值的时间和 MAP 与目标值的差异)明显更高(低于 MAP 目标值的时间更少、更多),在随后的 12 小时治疗中(13-24 小时;62.2 对 43,P = 0.09)也有类似的结果。在随后的 72 小时内(25-96 小时;156.4 vs 136.6,P = 0.57),两组之间没有差异:结论:脊髓在最初 12 小时内的高灌注与 SCI 患者神经功能的改善密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信