Clinical implications of multidisciplinary team pancreatic cyst evaluation.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-06-27
Marie Ingemann Pedersen, Lars Peter Skovgaard Larsen, Jakob Kirkegård, Jacob Nygaard, Peter Kissmeyer, Frank Viborg Mortensen, Anders R Knudsen
{"title":"Clinical implications of multidisciplinary team pancreatic cyst evaluation.","authors":"Marie Ingemann Pedersen,&nbsp;Lars Peter Skovgaard Larsen,&nbsp;Jakob Kirkegård,&nbsp;Jacob Nygaard,&nbsp;Peter Kissmeyer,&nbsp;Frank Viborg Mortensen,&nbsp;Anders R Knudsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detection of incidental pancreatic cysts (PCs) is increasing due to frequent use of imaging. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical consequences of regular multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences for patients with PCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patient data were obtained by review of patient medical records. PCs were assessed at the weekly MDT in accordance with the revised Fukuoka guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 455 patients were evaluated within 12 months. A large proportion of the cysts could not be characterised and was handled as branch duct (BD)-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN). A total of 245 patients were included in a follow-up programme, whereas 175 patients were excluded. Further diagnostic work-up was recommended for 31 patients. A total of 66 patients were reviewed on MDT a second time during the study period, eight of whom received a diagnosis different from that given at the first MDT. A total of 35 patients with mucinous PC or cysts treated as BD-IPMN had either worrisome features (WF) or high-risk stigmata (HRS), four of these patients had a PC ≤ 10 mm. Indication for surgery was WF or HRS and, in the course of 12 months, six patients were recommended surgery taking their PS into account. Two patients had a malignant and two had a premalignant lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In all, 455 patients were evaluated to find 35 patients with suspected premalignant PCs. This means that almost 8% of the referred patients had suspicious lesions, which indicates a need for a regular MDT conference.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The detection of incidental pancreatic cysts (PCs) is increasing due to frequent use of imaging. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical consequences of regular multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences for patients with PCs.

Methods: All patient data were obtained by review of patient medical records. PCs were assessed at the weekly MDT in accordance with the revised Fukuoka guidelines.

Results: A total of 455 patients were evaluated within 12 months. A large proportion of the cysts could not be characterised and was handled as branch duct (BD)-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN). A total of 245 patients were included in a follow-up programme, whereas 175 patients were excluded. Further diagnostic work-up was recommended for 31 patients. A total of 66 patients were reviewed on MDT a second time during the study period, eight of whom received a diagnosis different from that given at the first MDT. A total of 35 patients with mucinous PC or cysts treated as BD-IPMN had either worrisome features (WF) or high-risk stigmata (HRS), four of these patients had a PC ≤ 10 mm. Indication for surgery was WF or HRS and, in the course of 12 months, six patients were recommended surgery taking their PS into account. Two patients had a malignant and two had a premalignant lesion.

Conclusion: In all, 455 patients were evaluated to find 35 patients with suspected premalignant PCs. This means that almost 8% of the referred patients had suspicious lesions, which indicates a need for a regular MDT conference.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

多学科小组胰腺囊肿评估的临床意义。
简介:由于影像学的频繁使用,偶发性胰腺囊肿(PCs)的检出率越来越高。本研究的目的是评估定期多学科小组(MDT)会议对pc患者的临床效果。方法:所有患者资料均通过查阅患者病历获得。根据修订后的福冈准则,在每周MDT上评估个人能力。结果:12个月内共对455例患者进行了评估。大部分囊肿无法表征,被处理为分枝管(BD)-导管内乳头状粘液瘤(IPMN)。共有245名患者被纳入随访计划,175名患者被排除在外。建议对31例患者进行进一步的诊断检查。在研究期间,共有66名患者接受了第二次MDT检查,其中8名患者接受了与第一次MDT不同的诊断。35例以BD-IPMN治疗的黏液性PC或囊肿患者有令人担忧的特征(WF)或高危柱头(HRS),其中4例PC≤10 mm。手术指征为WF或HRS,在12个月的过程中,考虑到他们的PS,建议6例患者进行手术。2例为恶性,2例为癌前病变。结论:共对455例患者进行评估,发现35例疑似恶性前pc。这意味着近8%的转诊患者有可疑病变,这表明需要定期召开MDT会议。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信