COVID-19 risk mitigation in reopening mass cultural events: population-based observational study for the UK Events Research Programme in Liverpool City Region.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1177/01410768231182389
Girvan Burnside, Christopher P Cheyne, Gary Leeming, Michael Humann, Alistair Darby, Mark A Green, Alexander Crozier, Simon Maskell, Kay O'Halloran, Elena Musi, Elinor Carmi, Naila Khan, Debra Fisher, Rhiannon Corcoran, Jake Dunning, W John Edmunds, Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam, David M Hughes, Liora Malki-Epshtein, Malcolm Cook, Ben M Roberts, Eileen Gallagher, Kate Howell, Meera Chand, Robin Kemp, Matthew Boulter, Tom Fowler, Malcolm G Semple, Emer Coffey, Matt Ashton, Marta García-Fiñana, Iain E Buchan
{"title":"COVID-19 risk mitigation in reopening mass cultural events: population-based observational study for the UK Events Research Programme in Liverpool City Region.","authors":"Girvan Burnside, Christopher P Cheyne, Gary Leeming, Michael Humann, Alistair Darby, Mark A Green, Alexander Crozier, Simon Maskell, Kay O'Halloran, Elena Musi, Elinor Carmi, Naila Khan, Debra Fisher, Rhiannon Corcoran, Jake Dunning, W John Edmunds, Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam, David M Hughes, Liora Malki-Epshtein, Malcolm Cook, Ben M Roberts, Eileen Gallagher, Kate Howell, Meera Chand, Robin Kemp, Matthew Boulter, Tom Fowler, Malcolm G Semple, Emer Coffey, Matt Ashton, Marta García-Fiñana, Iain E Buchan","doi":"10.1177/01410768231182389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission risks, perceived risks and the feasibility of risk mitigations from experimental mass cultural events before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions were lifted.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, population-wide observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four events (two nightclubs, an outdoor music festival and a business conference) open to Liverpool City Region UK residents, requiring a negative lateral flow test (LFT) within the 36 h before the event, but not requiring social distancing or face-coverings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 12,256 individuals attending one or more events between 28 April and 2 May 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 infections detected using audience self-swabbed (5-7 days post-event) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, with viral genomic analysis of cases, plus linked National Health Service COVID-19 testing data. Audience experiences were gathered via questionnaires, focus groups and social media. Indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 PCR-positive cases (likely 4 index, 8 primary or secondary), 10 from the nightclubs. Two further cases had positive LFTs but no PCR. A total of 11,896 (97.1%) participants with scanned tickets were matched to a negative pre-event LFT: 4972 (40.6%) returned a PCR within a week. CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations showed areas for improving ventilation at the nightclubs. Population infection rates were low, yet with a concurrent outbreak of >50 linked cases around a local swimming pool without equivalent risk mitigations. Audience anxiety was low and enjoyment high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed minor SARS-CoV-2 transmission and low perceived risks around events when prevalence was low and risk mitigations prominent. Partnership between audiences, event organisers and public health services, supported by information systems with real-time linked data, can improve health security for mass cultural events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231182389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission risks, perceived risks and the feasibility of risk mitigations from experimental mass cultural events before coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions were lifted.

Design: Prospective, population-wide observational study.

Setting: Four events (two nightclubs, an outdoor music festival and a business conference) open to Liverpool City Region UK residents, requiring a negative lateral flow test (LFT) within the 36 h before the event, but not requiring social distancing or face-coverings.

Participants: A total of 12,256 individuals attending one or more events between 28 April and 2 May 2021.

Main outcome measures: SARS-CoV-2 infections detected using audience self-swabbed (5-7 days post-event) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, with viral genomic analysis of cases, plus linked National Health Service COVID-19 testing data. Audience experiences were gathered via questionnaires, focus groups and social media. Indoor CO2 concentrations were monitored.

Results: A total of 12 PCR-positive cases (likely 4 index, 8 primary or secondary), 10 from the nightclubs. Two further cases had positive LFTs but no PCR. A total of 11,896 (97.1%) participants with scanned tickets were matched to a negative pre-event LFT: 4972 (40.6%) returned a PCR within a week. CO2 concentrations showed areas for improving ventilation at the nightclubs. Population infection rates were low, yet with a concurrent outbreak of >50 linked cases around a local swimming pool without equivalent risk mitigations. Audience anxiety was low and enjoyment high.

Conclusions: We observed minor SARS-CoV-2 transmission and low perceived risks around events when prevalence was low and risk mitigations prominent. Partnership between audiences, event organisers and public health services, supported by information systems with real-time linked data, can improve health security for mass cultural events.

COVID-19 降低群众文化活动重新开放的风险:利物浦城市地区英国活动研究计划的人口观察研究。
目的了解严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的传播风险、感知风险以及在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)限制解除之前从实验性群众文化活动中降低风险的可行性:前瞻性、全人群观察研究:四项活动(两家夜总会、一个户外音乐节和一个商务会议)对利物浦市地区的英国居民开放,要求在活动前36小时内进行阴性侧流试验(LFT),但不要求拉开社交距离或遮盖面部:在 2021 年 4 月 28 日至 5 月 2 日期间,共有 12,256 人参加了一次或多次活动:通过观众自拭(活动后5-7天)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测发现的SARS-CoV-2感染病例,并对病例进行病毒基因组分析,以及相关的国民健康服务COVID-19检测数据。通过问卷调查、焦点小组和社交媒体收集观众的体验。对室内二氧化碳浓度进行了监测:共有 12 例 PCR 阳性病例(可能 4 例为指数型,8 例为原发性或继发性),其中 10 例来自夜总会。另有两个病例的 LFT 呈阳性,但没有 PCR。共有 11,896 名(97.1%)持有扫描门票的参与者与活动前 LFT 阴性者进行了比对:4972 人(40.6%)在一周内返回了 PCR。二氧化碳浓度显示,夜总会的通风状况有待改善。人群感染率较低,但在当地一个游泳池周围同时爆发了 50 例以上的相关病例,而没有采取同等的风险缓解措施。观众的焦虑程度较低,享受程度较高:我们观察到,SARS-CoV-2 在流行率低、风险缓解措施突出的活动中传播较少,感知风险较低。观众、活动组织者和公共卫生服务机构之间的合作关系,在具有实时链接数据的信息系统的支持下,可以提高群众文化活动的卫生安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1809, the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM) has been a trusted source of information in the medical field. Our publication covers a wide range of topics, including evidence-based reviews, original research papers, commentaries, and personal perspectives. As an independent scientific and educational journal, we strive to foster constructive discussions on vital clinical matters. While we are based in the UK, our articles address issues that are globally relevant and of interest to healthcare professionals worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信