Favorable outcomes of navigated percutaneous ablation and cementoplasty of bone metastasis in the extremities and pelvis-a case series of 13 cases.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ben Efrima, Amit Benady, Joshua E Ovadia, Assaf Albagli, Ehud Rath, Solomon Dadia, Yair Gortzak, Amir Sternheim, Omri Merose, Ortal Segal
{"title":"Favorable outcomes of navigated percutaneous ablation and cementoplasty of bone metastasis in the extremities and pelvis-a case series of 13 cases.","authors":"Ben Efrima,&nbsp;Amit Benady,&nbsp;Joshua E Ovadia,&nbsp;Assaf Albagli,&nbsp;Ehud Rath,&nbsp;Solomon Dadia,&nbsp;Yair Gortzak,&nbsp;Amir Sternheim,&nbsp;Omri Merose,&nbsp;Ortal Segal","doi":"10.1177/10225536231171046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Palliative treatment options for bone metastasis are limited, especially in cases where standard protocols have already failed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation, either by cryoablation or radiofrequency, combined with percutaneous cementoplasty using cone-beam guided navigation. The objective was to relieve symptoms and improve functionality in patients suffering from pain secondary to bone metastases, as well as evaluate local disease progression post ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of 13 patients (average age 63.6 ± 9.8, nine females) with symptomatic skeletal metastases treated using 3D imaging with navigation and followed for at least 12 months. The treatment protocol was implemented either after failure of first line treatment, or as first line when mechanical instability was present. Percutaneous lesion ablation was performed along with percutaneous cementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we observed a statistically significant decrease in pain. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain score decreased from 7.1 ± 0.4 prior to CRA/RFA to 2.2 ± 0.3 after the procedure (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At the 12-months follow-up, all patients were able to ambulate with no assistance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2). One minor adverse event (paresthesia) and one major adverse event (drop foot) were resolved at 1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of bone metastasis with RFA and CRA in conjunction with cementoplasty using Cone-beam computed tomography navigation provides patients with significant palliative outcomes and in most cases, local tumor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":48794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"31 2","pages":"10225536231171046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231171046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Palliative treatment options for bone metastasis are limited, especially in cases where standard protocols have already failed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation, either by cryoablation or radiofrequency, combined with percutaneous cementoplasty using cone-beam guided navigation. The objective was to relieve symptoms and improve functionality in patients suffering from pain secondary to bone metastases, as well as evaluate local disease progression post ablation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 13 patients (average age 63.6 ± 9.8, nine females) with symptomatic skeletal metastases treated using 3D imaging with navigation and followed for at least 12 months. The treatment protocol was implemented either after failure of first line treatment, or as first line when mechanical instability was present. Percutaneous lesion ablation was performed along with percutaneous cementation.

Results: In this study, we observed a statistically significant decrease in pain. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain score decreased from 7.1 ± 0.4 prior to CRA/RFA to 2.2 ± 0.3 after the procedure (p < 0.001). At the 12-months follow-up, all patients were able to ambulate with no assistance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2). One minor adverse event (paresthesia) and one major adverse event (drop foot) were resolved at 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusions: Treatment of bone metastasis with RFA and CRA in conjunction with cementoplasty using Cone-beam computed tomography navigation provides patients with significant palliative outcomes and in most cases, local tumor control.

经皮骨水泥消融与骨水泥成形术治疗四肢及骨盆骨转移的良好效果——13例病例分析。
目的:骨转移的姑息治疗选择是有限的,特别是在标准方案已经失败的情况下。本研究的目的是评估经皮消融的有效性和安全性,无论是冷冻消融还是射频消融,结合经皮椎体成形术使用锥形束引导导航。目的是缓解骨转移继发疼痛患者的症状和改善功能,并评估消融后局部疾病的进展。方法:我们对13例(平均年龄63.6±9.8岁,9例女性)有症状的骨骼转移患者进行回顾性研究,采用三维成像导航治疗,随访至少12个月。治疗方案要么在一线治疗失败后实施,要么在出现机械不稳定时作为一线实施。经皮病灶消融与经皮骨水泥同时进行。结果:在本研究中,我们观察到疼痛有统计学意义的减轻。平均视觉模拟量表疼痛评分从CRA/RFA前的7.1±0.4降至手术后的2.2±0.3 (p < 0.001)。在12个月的随访中,所有患者都能在没有帮助的情况下行走。结论:骨转移的RFA和CRA治疗结合锥形束计算机断层扫描导航骨水泥成形术为患者提供了显著的姑息治疗结果,在大多数情况下,局部肿瘤得到了控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信