Exploring the outcomes of a reflective teaching strategy with students: A feasibility study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Michael Dunne, Merrolee Penman, Gillian Nisbet
{"title":"Exploring the outcomes of a reflective teaching strategy with students: A feasibility study.","authors":"Michael Dunne, Merrolee Penman, Gillian Nisbet","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2023.2223373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reflection can be a valuable learning strategy for connecting theory with practice and illuminating insights and understandings from complex or messy experiences. This learning is critical for educators and health professionals who work or teach students in complex contexts. In anticipation of their future needs, speech-language pathology students, like many health profession students in Australia, are expected to demonstrate the ability to reflect on their practice as part of their professional practice or clinical education. It is challenging to support educators to facilitate reflection and students to learn when, why, and how to reflect for personally and professionally meaningful outcomes given the diversity in understandings and capabilities present in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of an evidence-based reflection intervention to clarify and support student reflective practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A convergent mixed methods design captured quantitative and qualitative results from 16 participants for a better understanding of the feasibility of a reflection intervention.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The diversity in the reflection literature also appears to be present in students' reflection approaches. This diversity can encourage student engagement and ownership of reflecting when considered within a rich learning environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings are discussed for timely, intellectually and emotionally safe reflection interventions that develop students' reflective inquiry in the real-world.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2223373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Reflection can be a valuable learning strategy for connecting theory with practice and illuminating insights and understandings from complex or messy experiences. This learning is critical for educators and health professionals who work or teach students in complex contexts. In anticipation of their future needs, speech-language pathology students, like many health profession students in Australia, are expected to demonstrate the ability to reflect on their practice as part of their professional practice or clinical education. It is challenging to support educators to facilitate reflection and students to learn when, why, and how to reflect for personally and professionally meaningful outcomes given the diversity in understandings and capabilities present in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of an evidence-based reflection intervention to clarify and support student reflective practice.

Method: A convergent mixed methods design captured quantitative and qualitative results from 16 participants for a better understanding of the feasibility of a reflection intervention.

Result: The diversity in the reflection literature also appears to be present in students' reflection approaches. This diversity can encourage student engagement and ownership of reflecting when considered within a rich learning environment.

Conclusion: Findings are discussed for timely, intellectually and emotionally safe reflection interventions that develop students' reflective inquiry in the real-world.

与学生一起探索反思性教学策略的成果:可行性研究。
目的:反思是一种宝贵的学习策略,它可以将理论与实践联系起来,并从复杂或混乱的经历中阐明见解和理解。对于在复杂环境中工作或教授学生的教育工作者和医疗专业人员来说,这种学习至关重要。与澳大利亚的许多健康专业学生一样,言语病理专业的学生也被要求在专业实践或临床教育中展示出反思实践的能力,以满足他们未来的需求。鉴于文献中对反思的理解和能力存在差异,要支持教育者促进反思,并让学生学会何时、为何以及如何进行反思,以取得对个人和职业有意义的成果,是一项具有挑战性的工作。本研究的目的是调查循证反思干预的可行性,以澄清和支持学生的反思实践:方法:采用聚合混合方法设计,从 16 名参与者那里获取定量和定性结果,以更好地了解反思干预的可行性:结果:反思文献中的多样性似乎也存在于学生的反思方法中。在丰富的学习环境中,这种多样性可以鼓励学生参与和自主反思:结论:本文讨论了及时、智力和情感安全的反思干预措施,以培养学生在现实世界中的反思探究能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信