Yousef Ahmad, Luke Domaleski, Michael Hellmann, Patrick Kosciuk, Christopher Radchenko, Arjan Flora, Roman Jandarov
{"title":"A Novel Simulator for Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Needle Biopsy.","authors":"Yousef Ahmad, Luke Domaleski, Michael Hellmann, Patrick Kosciuk, Christopher Radchenko, Arjan Flora, Roman Jandarov","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer, and there is an increasing need for procedural competence in trainees. We evaluate a low-cost, gelatin-based EBUS-TBNA training simulator to assess pulmonary fellows' baseline skills and facilitate procedural development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A low-cost ($30) gelatin-based, high-fidelity simulator was created to represent the airways, major vessels, and lymph node stations essential to identify for EBUS-TBNA. Trainees had a baseline skills assessment using the simulator and were then provided a 1-hour didactic session on EBUS-TBNA and additional practice time with the simulator. Trainees then underwent a postsimulation skills assessment using a modified endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool (STAT) performance assessment tool. Simulator fidelity and trainee procedural confidence was assessed using a 10-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten fellows received training on the EBUS-TBNA simulator. First-year trainees scored the lowest on the 18-point performance scale with a mean score of 9, while third-year trainees scored highest with a mean score of 17.5. Mean 18-point performance score improvement after simulator training and didactics was 4.31 points for all trainees with the largest change in first-year trainees amounting to 8.25 points. First-year trainees experienced the greatest improvement in EBUS procedural confidence by a mean of 2.5 points on a 10-point confidence survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-cost EBUS simulator effectively differentiated early and advanced learners based on graded procedural performance scores. Simulation-based practice significantly improved learners' procedural performance, and the degree of improvement correlated with learner inexperience. The simulation significantly increased early learner confidence in EBUS-TBNA technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer, and there is an increasing need for procedural competence in trainees. We evaluate a low-cost, gelatin-based EBUS-TBNA training simulator to assess pulmonary fellows' baseline skills and facilitate procedural development.
Methods: A low-cost ($30) gelatin-based, high-fidelity simulator was created to represent the airways, major vessels, and lymph node stations essential to identify for EBUS-TBNA. Trainees had a baseline skills assessment using the simulator and were then provided a 1-hour didactic session on EBUS-TBNA and additional practice time with the simulator. Trainees then underwent a postsimulation skills assessment using a modified endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool (STAT) performance assessment tool. Simulator fidelity and trainee procedural confidence was assessed using a 10-point scale.
Results: Ten fellows received training on the EBUS-TBNA simulator. First-year trainees scored the lowest on the 18-point performance scale with a mean score of 9, while third-year trainees scored highest with a mean score of 17.5. Mean 18-point performance score improvement after simulator training and didactics was 4.31 points for all trainees with the largest change in first-year trainees amounting to 8.25 points. First-year trainees experienced the greatest improvement in EBUS procedural confidence by a mean of 2.5 points on a 10-point confidence survey.
Conclusion: A low-cost EBUS simulator effectively differentiated early and advanced learners based on graded procedural performance scores. Simulation-based practice significantly improved learners' procedural performance, and the degree of improvement correlated with learner inexperience. The simulation significantly increased early learner confidence in EBUS-TBNA technique.