A Novel Simulator for Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Needle Biopsy.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yousef Ahmad, Luke Domaleski, Michael Hellmann, Patrick Kosciuk, Christopher Radchenko, Arjan Flora, Roman Jandarov
{"title":"A Novel Simulator for Teaching Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Needle Biopsy.","authors":"Yousef Ahmad,&nbsp;Luke Domaleski,&nbsp;Michael Hellmann,&nbsp;Patrick Kosciuk,&nbsp;Christopher Radchenko,&nbsp;Arjan Flora,&nbsp;Roman Jandarov","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer, and there is an increasing need for procedural competence in trainees. We evaluate a low-cost, gelatin-based EBUS-TBNA training simulator to assess pulmonary fellows' baseline skills and facilitate procedural development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A low-cost ($30) gelatin-based, high-fidelity simulator was created to represent the airways, major vessels, and lymph node stations essential to identify for EBUS-TBNA. Trainees had a baseline skills assessment using the simulator and were then provided a 1-hour didactic session on EBUS-TBNA and additional practice time with the simulator. Trainees then underwent a postsimulation skills assessment using a modified endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool (STAT) performance assessment tool. Simulator fidelity and trainee procedural confidence was assessed using a 10-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten fellows received training on the EBUS-TBNA simulator. First-year trainees scored the lowest on the 18-point performance scale with a mean score of 9, while third-year trainees scored highest with a mean score of 17.5. Mean 18-point performance score improvement after simulator training and didactics was 4.31 points for all trainees with the largest change in first-year trainees amounting to 8.25 points. First-year trainees experienced the greatest improvement in EBUS procedural confidence by a mean of 2.5 points on a 10-point confidence survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-cost EBUS simulator effectively differentiated early and advanced learners based on graded procedural performance scores. Simulation-based practice significantly improved learners' procedural performance, and the degree of improvement correlated with learner inexperience. The simulation significantly increased early learner confidence in EBUS-TBNA technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become standard for the diagnosis of lung cancer, and there is an increasing need for procedural competence in trainees. We evaluate a low-cost, gelatin-based EBUS-TBNA training simulator to assess pulmonary fellows' baseline skills and facilitate procedural development.

Methods: A low-cost ($30) gelatin-based, high-fidelity simulator was created to represent the airways, major vessels, and lymph node stations essential to identify for EBUS-TBNA. Trainees had a baseline skills assessment using the simulator and were then provided a 1-hour didactic session on EBUS-TBNA and additional practice time with the simulator. Trainees then underwent a postsimulation skills assessment using a modified endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool (STAT) performance assessment tool. Simulator fidelity and trainee procedural confidence was assessed using a 10-point scale.

Results: Ten fellows received training on the EBUS-TBNA simulator. First-year trainees scored the lowest on the 18-point performance scale with a mean score of 9, while third-year trainees scored highest with a mean score of 17.5. Mean 18-point performance score improvement after simulator training and didactics was 4.31 points for all trainees with the largest change in first-year trainees amounting to 8.25 points. First-year trainees experienced the greatest improvement in EBUS procedural confidence by a mean of 2.5 points on a 10-point confidence survey.

Conclusion: A low-cost EBUS simulator effectively differentiated early and advanced learners based on graded procedural performance scores. Simulation-based practice significantly improved learners' procedural performance, and the degree of improvement correlated with learner inexperience. The simulation significantly increased early learner confidence in EBUS-TBNA technique.

一种用于支气管内超声引导针活检教学的新型模拟器。
背景:支气管内超声引导下经支气管针抽吸(EBUS-TBNA)已成为诊断癌症的标准,并且对受训人员的操作能力的需求越来越高。我们评估了一种低成本、基于明胶的EBUS-TBNA训练模拟器,以评估肺部研究员的基线技能并促进程序开发。方法:创建一个低成本(30美元)的基于明胶的高保真模拟器,以表示对EBUS-TBNA识别至关重要的气道、主要血管和淋巴结部位。学员使用模拟器进行了基线技能评估,然后接受了1小时的EBUS-TBNA教学,并使用模拟器进行额外的练习。然后,受训者使用改良的支气管内超声(EBUS)-技能和任务评估工具(STAT)绩效评估工具进行刺激后技能评估。使用10分量表评估模拟器逼真度和受训人员程序置信度。结果:10名学员接受了EBUS-TBNA模拟器的培训。第一年的学员在18分的绩效量表中得分最低,平均得分为9分,而第三年的学员得分最高,平均得分17.5分。模拟机培训和教学后,所有学员的平均成绩提高了18分,为4.31分,其中第一年学员的变化最大,为8.25分。在10点信心调查中,一年级学员在EBUS程序信心方面的改善最大,平均为2.5点。结论:低成本的EBUS模拟器根据分级的程序表现分数有效地区分了早期和高级学习者。基于模拟的实践显著提高了学习者的程序表现,并且改进程度与学习者缺乏经验相关。该模拟显著提高了早期学习者对EBUS-TBNA技术的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信