Inactivation kinetics of benzalkonium chloride and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against a betacoronavirus and an alphacoronavirus

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Brandon L. Herdt , Luisa A. Ikner
{"title":"Inactivation kinetics of benzalkonium chloride and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against a betacoronavirus and an alphacoronavirus","authors":"Brandon L. Herdt ,&nbsp;Luisa A. Ikner","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand hygiene is critical to lower the potential for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents by direct contact. When running water and soap are not available for hand hygiene, ethanol-based hand sanitizers are currently the recommended standard of care [1–3]. Though recently published data showed comparable <em>in vitro</em> effectiveness of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-based and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against SARS-CoV-2 virus, a paucity of peer-reviewed data on the effectiveness of these formulations against other types of infective coronaviruses remains. This work assessed human coronavirus HCoV-229E (genus <em>Alphacoronavirus</em>) concurrently with SARS-CoV-2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020 (genus <em>Betacoronavirus</em>) to fill this gap.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The test was conducted according to EN14476:2013-A2:2019 [EN14476] Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Virucidal Activity in the Medical Area [4]. Two BAK-based hand sanitizers, five ethanol-based hand sanitizers, and an 80% ethanol reference formulation were tested for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at 15- and 30- second contact times.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E were reduced by greater than 4.00-log<sub>10</sub> within 15 seconds of contact. Virus decay constants (<em>k</em>) following first-order kinetics were similar for BAK and ethanol-based formulations against both test viruses. The SARS-CoV-2 results reported herein mirrored previous data reported by Herdt <em>et al.</em> (2021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BAK and ethanol hand sanitizer formulations inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at similar rates. This data supports previously published effectiveness data for both chemistries and indicates that additional coronavirus strains and variants would demonstrate similar inactivation trends.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/e4/main.PMC10266983.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hand hygiene is critical to lower the potential for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents by direct contact. When running water and soap are not available for hand hygiene, ethanol-based hand sanitizers are currently the recommended standard of care [1–3]. Though recently published data showed comparable in vitro effectiveness of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-based and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against SARS-CoV-2 virus, a paucity of peer-reviewed data on the effectiveness of these formulations against other types of infective coronaviruses remains. This work assessed human coronavirus HCoV-229E (genus Alphacoronavirus) concurrently with SARS-CoV-2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020 (genus Betacoronavirus) to fill this gap.

Methods

The test was conducted according to EN14476:2013-A2:2019 [EN14476] Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Virucidal Activity in the Medical Area [4]. Two BAK-based hand sanitizers, five ethanol-based hand sanitizers, and an 80% ethanol reference formulation were tested for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at 15- and 30- second contact times.

Results

Both SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E were reduced by greater than 4.00-log10 within 15 seconds of contact. Virus decay constants (k) following first-order kinetics were similar for BAK and ethanol-based formulations against both test viruses. The SARS-CoV-2 results reported herein mirrored previous data reported by Herdt et al. (2021).

Conclusion

BAK and ethanol hand sanitizer formulations inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at similar rates. This data supports previously published effectiveness data for both chemistries and indicates that additional coronavirus strains and variants would demonstrate similar inactivation trends.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

苯扎氯铵和乙醇基洗手液对乙型冠状病毒和甲型冠状病毒的失活动力学
手部卫生对于降低SARS-CoV-2和其他感染原通过直接接触传播的可能性至关重要。当没有自来水和肥皂用于手部卫生时,目前推荐使用含乙醇的洗手液作为护理标准[1-3]。尽管最近发表的数据显示,基于苯扎氯铵(BAK)的洗手液和基于乙醇的洗手液对SARS-CoV-2病毒的体外有效性相当,但关于这些配方对其他类型传染性冠状病毒的有效性的同行评审数据仍然缺乏。本研究对人类冠状病毒HCoV-229E(甲型冠状病毒属)与SARS-CoV-2同时进行了评估,分离出USA-WA1/2020(乙型冠状病毒属)来填补这一空白。方法按照EN14476:2013- a2:2019 [EN14476]《医用区域毒力定量悬浮试验评价》进行试验。在15秒和30秒的接触时间下,测试了两种基于bakv的洗手液、五种基于乙醇的洗手液和80%乙醇的参考配方对SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E的抗病毒活性。结果SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E在接触15秒内均降低了4.00-log10以上。基于BAK和乙醇的配方对两种测试病毒的一阶动力学下的病毒衰变常数(k)相似。本文报告的SARS-CoV-2结果反映了Herdt等人(2021)先前报告的数据。结论bak和乙醇洗手液配方对SARS-CoV-2和HCoV-229E的灭活率相似。这一数据支持了之前发表的两种化学物质的有效性数据,并表明其他冠状病毒毒株和变体将表现出类似的失活趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信