Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block.

Reza Tabrizi, Hassan Mohajerani, Hamidreza Moslemi, Shervin Shafiei, Shobeir Majdi
{"title":"Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block.","authors":"Reza Tabrizi,&nbsp;Hassan Mohajerani,&nbsp;Hamidreza Moslemi,&nbsp;Shervin Shafiei,&nbsp;Shobeir Majdi","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction may interfere with optimal dental implant placement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) and thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site in simultaneous versus delayed implant placement following lateral ramus horizontal ridge augmentation in the posterior mandible.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted on patients who required horizontal bone augmentation of the posterior mandible using lateral ramus autogenous bone graft. Patients were divided into two groups of simultaneous implant placement (group 1) and delayed implant placement (group 2). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before augmentation, at the time of implant placement, and 10 months later (6 months after implant loading). MBL and thickness of the buccal aspect were evaluated over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18 patients in the group 1 and 16 patients in the group 2. Analysis of the CBCT scans demonstrated that the mean MBL was 1.21±0.35mm in the group 1 and 1.08±0.19mm in the group 2, with no significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i>= 0.19). Thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site at the time of implant placement was 1.85±0.20mm in the group 1 and 2.16±0.29 mm in the group 2, with a significant difference (<i>p</i>< 0.001). However, data analysis regarding changes in the buccal plate thickness showed no significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i>= 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference in M-BL and post-operative changes in the thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented sites with onlay lateral ramus bone blocks between simultaneous and delayed implant placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"24 2","pages":"200-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction may interfere with optimal dental implant placement.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) and thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site in simultaneous versus delayed implant placement following lateral ramus horizontal ridge augmentation in the posterior mandible.

Materials and method: This prospective cohort study was conducted on patients who required horizontal bone augmentation of the posterior mandible using lateral ramus autogenous bone graft. Patients were divided into two groups of simultaneous implant placement (group 1) and delayed implant placement (group 2). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before augmentation, at the time of implant placement, and 10 months later (6 months after implant loading). MBL and thickness of the buccal aspect were evaluated over time.

Results: There were 18 patients in the group 1 and 16 patients in the group 2. Analysis of the CBCT scans demonstrated that the mean MBL was 1.21±0.35mm in the group 1 and 1.08±0.19mm in the group 2, with no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.19). Thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site at the time of implant placement was 1.85±0.20mm in the group 1 and 2.16±0.29 mm in the group 2, with a significant difference (p< 0.001). However, data analysis regarding changes in the buccal plate thickness showed no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.36).

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference in M-BL and post-operative changes in the thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented sites with onlay lateral ramus bone blocks between simultaneous and delayed implant placement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自体侧支骨块水平嵴增强术并发与延迟种植体边缘骨丢失的比较。
问题陈述:拔牙后牙槽嵴吸收可能会影响牙种植体的最佳放置。目的:本研究旨在比较在后颌骨侧支水平嵴增加后,同时与延迟种植体放置增加部位的边缘骨损失(MBL)和颊面厚度。材料和方法:本前瞻性队列研究是对需要使用侧支自体骨移植物进行后下颌水平骨增强的患者进行的。患者分为同步种植体放置组(1组)和延迟种植体放置组(2组)。在增强前、种植体放置时和10个月后(种植体装载后6个月)获得锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。随着时间的推移,评估MBL和颊部厚度。结果:1组18例,2组16例。CBCT扫描分析显示,组1平均MBL为1.21±0.35mm,组2平均MBL为1.08±0.19mm,两组间差异无统计学意义(p= 0.19)。种植体放置时增厚部位颊面厚度1组为1.85±0.20mm, 2组为2.16±0.29 mm,差异有统计学意义(p< 0.001)。然而,数据分析显示两组间颊板厚度变化无显著性差异(p= 0.36)。结论:根据本研究的结果,同时和延迟种植体放置的侧支骨块增强部位的M-BL和术后厚度变化无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信