Using Pathology Synoptic Reporting Data to Create Individual Dashboards for Pathologists and Surgeons.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Gurpal Bisra, Brigette Rabel, Nick van der Westhuizen
{"title":"Using Pathology Synoptic Reporting Data to Create Individual Dashboards for Pathologists and Surgeons.","authors":"Gurpal Bisra, Brigette Rabel, Nick van der Westhuizen","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Electronic synoptic pathology reporting using xPert from mTuitive is available to all pathologists in British Columbia, Canada. Comparative feedback reports for pathologists and surgeons were created by using the synoptic reporting software.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To use data stored in a single central data repository to provide nonpunitive confidential comparative feedback reports (dashboards) to individual pathologists and surgeons for reflection on their practice and to use aggregate data for quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Integration of mTuitive middleware in 5 different laboratory information systems to have 1 software solution (xPert) sending discrete data elements to the central data repository was performed. Microsoft Office products were used to build comparative feedback reports and made the infrastructure sustainable. Two different types of reports were developed: individual confidential feedback reports (dashboards) and aggregated data reports.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Pathologists have access to an individual confidential live feedback report for the 5 major cancer sites. Surgeons get an annual confidential emailed PDF report. Several quality improvement initiatives were identified from the aggregate data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>We present 2 novel dashboards: a live pathologist dashboard and a static surgeon dashboard. Individual confidential dashboards incentivize use of nonmandated electronic synoptic pathology reporting tools and have increased adoption rates. Use of dashboards has also led to discussions about how patient care may be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Electronic synoptic pathology reporting using xPert from mTuitive is available to all pathologists in British Columbia, Canada. Comparative feedback reports for pathologists and surgeons were created by using the synoptic reporting software.

Objective.—: To use data stored in a single central data repository to provide nonpunitive confidential comparative feedback reports (dashboards) to individual pathologists and surgeons for reflection on their practice and to use aggregate data for quality improvement initiatives.

Design.—: Integration of mTuitive middleware in 5 different laboratory information systems to have 1 software solution (xPert) sending discrete data elements to the central data repository was performed. Microsoft Office products were used to build comparative feedback reports and made the infrastructure sustainable. Two different types of reports were developed: individual confidential feedback reports (dashboards) and aggregated data reports.

Results.—: Pathologists have access to an individual confidential live feedback report for the 5 major cancer sites. Surgeons get an annual confidential emailed PDF report. Several quality improvement initiatives were identified from the aggregate data.

Conclusions.—: We present 2 novel dashboards: a live pathologist dashboard and a static surgeon dashboard. Individual confidential dashboards incentivize use of nonmandated electronic synoptic pathology reporting tools and have increased adoption rates. Use of dashboards has also led to discussions about how patient care may be improved.

利用病理综合报告数据为病理学家和外科医生创建个人仪表板。
背景加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的所有病理学家均可使用 mTuitive 的 xPert 进行电子病理综合报告。病理学家和外科医生的比较反馈报告是通过使用同步报告软件制作的:使用存储在单一中央数据存储库中的数据,向病理学家和外科医生提供非惩罚性的保密比较反馈报告(仪表板),以便他们对自己的实践进行反思,并将汇总数据用于质量改进措施:设计:将 mTuitive 中间件集成到 5 个不同的实验室信息系统中,由一个软件解决方案(xPert)向中央数据储存库发送离散数据元素。微软 Office 产品被用来建立比较反馈报告,并使基础设施具有可持续性。开发了两种不同类型的报告:个人保密反馈报告(仪表板)和汇总数据报告:病理学家可以访问 5 个主要癌症部位的个人保密实时反馈报告。外科医生每年会收到一份通过电子邮件发送的 PDF 格式保密报告。从汇总数据中发现了几项质量改进措施:我们提出了 2 个新颖的仪表板:实时病理学家仪表板和静态外科医生仪表板。个人保密仪表盘激励人们使用非强制性的电子病理综合报告工具,并提高了采用率。仪表板的使用还引发了关于如何改善患者护理的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信