A systematic review of treatments for misophonia

Seth A. Mattson, Johann D'Souza, Katharine D. Wojcik, Andrew G. Guzick, Wayne K. Goodman, Eric A. Storch
{"title":"A systematic review of treatments for misophonia","authors":"Seth A. Mattson,&nbsp;Johann D'Souza,&nbsp;Katharine D. Wojcik,&nbsp;Andrew G. Guzick,&nbsp;Wayne K. Goodman,&nbsp;Eric A. Storch","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2023.100104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Research into misophonia treatments has been limited and it is unclear what treatment approaches may be effective. This </span>systematic review<span><span> extracted and synthesized relevant treatment research on misophonia to examine the efficacy of various intervention modalities and identify current trends in order to guide future treatment research. PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central were searched using the keywords “misophonia,” “decreased sound tolerance,” “selective sound sensitivity,” or “decreased sound sensitivity.” Of the 169 records available for initial screening, 33 studied misophonia treatment specifically. Data were available for one </span>randomized controlled trial<span>, one open label trial, and 31 case studies. Treatments included various forms of psychotherapy, medication, and combinations of the two. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) incorporating various components has been the most often utilized and effective treatment for reduction of misophonia symptoms in one randomized trial and several case studies/series. Beyond CBT, various case studies suggested possible benefit from other treatment approaches depending on the patient’s symptom profile, although methodological rigor was limited. Given the limitations in the literature to date, including overall lack of rigor, lack of comparative studies, limited replication, and small sample size, the field would benefit from the development of mechanism-informed treatments, rigorous randomized trials, and treatment development with an eye towards dissemination and implementation.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276561/pdf/nihms-1907041.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171723000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research into misophonia treatments has been limited and it is unclear what treatment approaches may be effective. This systematic review extracted and synthesized relevant treatment research on misophonia to examine the efficacy of various intervention modalities and identify current trends in order to guide future treatment research. PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central were searched using the keywords “misophonia,” “decreased sound tolerance,” “selective sound sensitivity,” or “decreased sound sensitivity.” Of the 169 records available for initial screening, 33 studied misophonia treatment specifically. Data were available for one randomized controlled trial, one open label trial, and 31 case studies. Treatments included various forms of psychotherapy, medication, and combinations of the two. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) incorporating various components has been the most often utilized and effective treatment for reduction of misophonia symptoms in one randomized trial and several case studies/series. Beyond CBT, various case studies suggested possible benefit from other treatment approaches depending on the patient’s symptom profile, although methodological rigor was limited. Given the limitations in the literature to date, including overall lack of rigor, lack of comparative studies, limited replication, and small sample size, the field would benefit from the development of mechanism-informed treatments, rigorous randomized trials, and treatment development with an eye towards dissemination and implementation.

失音症治疗的系统综述
对发音障碍治疗的研究有限,目前尚不清楚哪些治疗方法可能有效。这篇系统综述提取并综合了发音不良的相关治疗研究,以检验各种干预方式的疗效,并确定当前趋势,从而指导未来的治疗研究。PubMed、PsycINFO、Google Scholar和Cochrane Central使用关键词“发音障碍”、“声音耐受性降低”、“选择性声音敏感性”或“声音敏感性降低”进行搜索。在可用于初步筛选的169份记录中,33份专门研究了发音障碍的治疗。数据可用于一项随机对照试验、一项开放标签试验和31项病例研究。治疗包括各种形式的心理治疗、药物治疗以及两者的结合。在一项随机试验和几个案例研究/系列中,结合各种成分的认知行为疗法(CBT)是减少失音症状最常用和最有效的治疗方法。除了CBT,各种案例研究表明,根据患者的症状特征,其他治疗方法可能会带来好处,尽管方法的严谨性有限。鉴于迄今为止文献的局限性,包括总体缺乏严谨性、缺乏比较研究、复制有限和样本量小,该领域将受益于机制知情治疗的开发、严格的随机试验以及着眼于传播和实施的治疗开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信