Negative consequences of reduced protein diets supplemented with synthetic amino acids for performance, intestinal barrier function, and caecal microbiota composition of broiler chickens

IF 6.3
Reza Barekatain , Peter V. Chrystal , Tanya Nowland , Amy F. Moss , Gordon S. Howarth , Thi Thu Hao Van , Robert J. Moore
{"title":"Negative consequences of reduced protein diets supplemented with synthetic amino acids for performance, intestinal barrier function, and caecal microbiota composition of broiler chickens","authors":"Reza Barekatain ,&nbsp;Peter V. Chrystal ,&nbsp;Tanya Nowland ,&nbsp;Amy F. Moss ,&nbsp;Gordon S. Howarth ,&nbsp;Thi Thu Hao Van ,&nbsp;Robert J. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.aninu.2023.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The consequences of feeding broiler chickens with reduced protein (RP) diets for gut health and barrier function are not well understood. This study was performed to elucidate the effect of reducing dietary protein and source of protein on gut health and performance parameters. Four experimental diets included 2 control diets with standard protein levels either containing meat and bone meal (CMBM) or an all-vegetable diet (CVEG), a medium RP diet (17.5% in growers and 16.5% in finisher), and a severe RP diet (15.6% in grower and 14.6% in finisher). Off-sex Ross 308 birds were assigned to each of the 4 diets and performance measurements were taken from d 7 to 42 post-hatch. Each diet was replicated 8 times (10 birds per replicate). A challenge study was conducted on additional 96 broilers (24 birds per diet) from d 13 to 21. Half of the birds in each dietary treatment were challenged by dexamethasone (DEX) to induce a leaky gut. Feeding birds with RP diets decreased weight gain (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and increased feed conversion ratio (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) from d 7 to 42 compared with control diets. There was no difference between CVEG and CMBM control diets for any parameter. The diet containing 15.6% protein increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) intestinal permeability independent of the DEX challenge. Gene expression of claudin-3 was downregulated (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) in birds fed 15.6% protein. There was a significant interaction between diet and DEX (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and both RP diets (17.5% and 15.6%) downregulated claudin-2 expression in DEX-challenged birds. The overall composition of the caecal microbiota was affected in birds fed 15.6% protein having a significantly lower richness of microbiota in both sham and DEX-injected birds. Proteobacteria was the main phylum driving the differences in birds fed 15.6% protein. At the family level, Bifidobacteriaceae, Unclassified Bifidobacteriales, Enterococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Lachnospiraceae were the main taxa in birds fed 15.6% protein. Despite supplementation of synthetic amino acids, severe reduction of dietary protein compromised performance and intestinal health parameters in broilers, evidenced by differential mRNA expression of tight junction proteins, higher permeability, and changes in caecal microbiota composition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62604,"journal":{"name":"Animal Nutrition","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 216-228"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/0b/main.PMC10300400.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405654523000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The consequences of feeding broiler chickens with reduced protein (RP) diets for gut health and barrier function are not well understood. This study was performed to elucidate the effect of reducing dietary protein and source of protein on gut health and performance parameters. Four experimental diets included 2 control diets with standard protein levels either containing meat and bone meal (CMBM) or an all-vegetable diet (CVEG), a medium RP diet (17.5% in growers and 16.5% in finisher), and a severe RP diet (15.6% in grower and 14.6% in finisher). Off-sex Ross 308 birds were assigned to each of the 4 diets and performance measurements were taken from d 7 to 42 post-hatch. Each diet was replicated 8 times (10 birds per replicate). A challenge study was conducted on additional 96 broilers (24 birds per diet) from d 13 to 21. Half of the birds in each dietary treatment were challenged by dexamethasone (DEX) to induce a leaky gut. Feeding birds with RP diets decreased weight gain (P < 0.0001) and increased feed conversion ratio (P < 0.0001) from d 7 to 42 compared with control diets. There was no difference between CVEG and CMBM control diets for any parameter. The diet containing 15.6% protein increased (P < 0.05) intestinal permeability independent of the DEX challenge. Gene expression of claudin-3 was downregulated (P < 0.05) in birds fed 15.6% protein. There was a significant interaction between diet and DEX (P < 0.05) and both RP diets (17.5% and 15.6%) downregulated claudin-2 expression in DEX-challenged birds. The overall composition of the caecal microbiota was affected in birds fed 15.6% protein having a significantly lower richness of microbiota in both sham and DEX-injected birds. Proteobacteria was the main phylum driving the differences in birds fed 15.6% protein. At the family level, Bifidobacteriaceae, Unclassified Bifidobacteriales, Enterococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Lachnospiraceae were the main taxa in birds fed 15.6% protein. Despite supplementation of synthetic amino acids, severe reduction of dietary protein compromised performance and intestinal health parameters in broilers, evidenced by differential mRNA expression of tight junction proteins, higher permeability, and changes in caecal microbiota composition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

添加合成氨基酸的低蛋白日粮对肉鸡生产性能、肠道屏障功能和盲肠微生物群组成的负面影响
用低蛋白(RP)日粮喂养肉鸡对肠道健康和屏障功能的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明减少膳食蛋白质和蛋白质来源对肠道健康和性能参数的影响。四种实验性日粮包括2种蛋白质水平标准的对照日粮,其中包括肉骨粉(CMBM)或全蔬菜日粮(CVEG),中等RP日粮(种植者为17.5%,修整者为16.5%)和严重RP日粮。将非性别的罗斯308只鸟分配到4种饮食中的每一种,并在孵化后第7天至第42天进行性能测量。每种饮食重复8次(每次重复10只鸟)。从第13天至第21天,对另外96只肉鸡(每天24只)进行了一项挑战性研究。在每种饮食治疗中,有一半的鸟类受到地塞米松(DEX)的挑战,以诱导肠道渗漏。与对照日粮相比,用RP日粮喂养鸟类在第7天至第42天降低了体重增加(P<;0.0001)并提高了饲料转化率(P<:0.0001)。CVEG和CMBM对照日粮在任何参数上都没有差异。含15.6%蛋白质的饮食增加了(P<;0.05)肠道通透性,与DEX攻击无关。在喂食15.6%蛋白质的鸟类中,claudin-3的基因表达下调(P<;0.05)。饮食和DEX之间存在显著的相互作用(P<;0.05),并且两种RP饮食(17.5%和15.6%)下调了DEX攻击的鸟类中claudin-2的表达。喂食15.6%蛋白质的鸟类盲肠微生物群的总体组成受到影响,在假手术和DEX注射的鸟类中,其微生物群的丰富度明显较低。变形杆菌是造成喂食15.6%蛋白质的鸟类差异的主要门。在科水平上,双歧杆菌科、未分类双歧杆菌目、肠球菌科、肠杆菌科和钩藤科是喂食15.6%蛋白质的鸟类的主要分类群。尽管补充了合成氨基酸,但日粮蛋白质的严重减少损害了肉鸡的性能和肠道健康参数,这可以从紧密连接蛋白的mRNA表达差异、较高的通透性和盲肠微生物群组成的变化中得到证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Nutrition
Animal Nutrition Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
542
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to primarily to the nutrition of farm animals and aquatic species. More applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as the evaluation of novel ingredients, feed additives and feed safety will also be considered but it is expected that such studies will have a strong nutritional focus. Animal Nutrition is indexed in SCIE, PubMed Central, Scopus, DOAJ, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信