Age- and endometrial microbiota-related delay in development of endometrial receptivity.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2023-06-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12523
Shunsaku Fujii, Takaaki Oguchi
{"title":"Age- and endometrial microbiota-related delay in development of endometrial receptivity.","authors":"Shunsaku Fujii, Takaaki Oguchi","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated factors affecting the development of endometrial receptivity according to age and changes in the endometrial microbiota.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited patients with infertility who underwent transcriptomic analyses of endometrial receptivity and the endometrial microbiome prior to frozen embryo transfer. An endometrial biopsy was performed 108 h after initial progesterone administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 185 tests from 185 eligible patients, the results of endometrial receptivity analysis were receptive in 111 (60.0%) patients and pre-receptive in 74 (40.0%) patients. Compared with receptive patients, pre-receptive patients had significantly older ages (36.0 ± 0.5 vs. 38.2 ± 0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.0021), a smaller proportion of normal <i>Lactobacillus</i>-dominant microbiota (27.9% vs. 12.2%), and a greater proportion of microbiota with ultralow biomass (22.5% vs. 41.9%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0074). Patient age (adjusted odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.16, <i>p</i> = 0.0351) and a microbiome with ultralow biomass (adjusted odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.49-9.82, <i>p</i> = 0.0039) were independent predictive factors for pre-receptive endometrium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older age was accompanied by a decrease in <i>Lactobacillus</i>-dominant microbiota; aging and endometrial microbiota with ultralow biomass were significantly associated with pre-receptive endometrium. Our findings suggest that the quantity (rather than proportion) of <i>Lactobacillus</i> in the endometrium is important in the development of endometrial receptivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":"e12523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10298046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated factors affecting the development of endometrial receptivity according to age and changes in the endometrial microbiota.

Methods: We recruited patients with infertility who underwent transcriptomic analyses of endometrial receptivity and the endometrial microbiome prior to frozen embryo transfer. An endometrial biopsy was performed 108 h after initial progesterone administration.

Results: In 185 tests from 185 eligible patients, the results of endometrial receptivity analysis were receptive in 111 (60.0%) patients and pre-receptive in 74 (40.0%) patients. Compared with receptive patients, pre-receptive patients had significantly older ages (36.0 ± 0.5 vs. 38.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.0021), a smaller proportion of normal Lactobacillus-dominant microbiota (27.9% vs. 12.2%), and a greater proportion of microbiota with ultralow biomass (22.5% vs. 41.9%) (p = 0.0074). Patient age (adjusted odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.16, p = 0.0351) and a microbiome with ultralow biomass (adjusted odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.49-9.82, p = 0.0039) were independent predictive factors for pre-receptive endometrium.

Conclusions: Older age was accompanied by a decrease in Lactobacillus-dominant microbiota; aging and endometrial microbiota with ultralow biomass were significantly associated with pre-receptive endometrium. Our findings suggest that the quantity (rather than proportion) of Lactobacillus in the endometrium is important in the development of endometrial receptivity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与年龄和子宫内膜微生物群有关的子宫内膜接受能力发育延迟。
目的:我们根据年龄和子宫内膜微生物群的变化评估了影响子宫内膜接受性发展的因素:我们招募了不孕症患者,在冷冻胚胎移植前对其子宫内膜接受性和子宫内膜微生物组进行了转录组学分析。在首次使用黄体酮 108 小时后进行子宫内膜活检:在 185 名符合条件的患者进行的 185 次检测中,111 名(60.0%)患者的子宫内膜受孕率分析结果为受孕,74 名(40.0%)患者的子宫内膜受孕率分析结果为前受孕。与接受性患者相比,接受前患者的年龄明显偏大(36.0 ± 0.5 vs. 38.2 ± 0.5,p = 0.0021),正常乳酸杆菌为主的微生物群比例较小(27.9% vs. 12.2%),超低生物量微生物群比例较大(22.5% vs. 41.9%)(p = 0.0074)。患者年龄(调整后的几率比:1.08,95% 置信区间:1.01-1.16,p = 0.0351)和超低生物量微生物群(调整后的几率比:3.82,95% 置信区间:1.49-9.82,p = 0.0039)是预测子宫内膜前位的独立因素:年龄越大,乳酸杆菌占优势的微生物群越少;老龄化和超低生物量的子宫内膜微生物群与先兆子宫内膜显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,子宫内膜中乳酸杆菌的数量(而非比例)对子宫内膜接受性的发展非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信